510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · Class II · 2025

Catalyst+, Catalyst+ HD

K200435510(k) TraditionalCleared May 7, 202073-day reviewClass II21 CFR 892.5050Recalls 2

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

C-Rad Positioning AB · IYE Accelerator, Linear, Medical

Cleared on May 7, 2020 as substantially equivalent to K113276 (C-Rad Positioning AB, 2012) after a 73-day review. Its family tree reaches back 5 generations to 1987. It has been recalled 2 times.

Decided
May 7, 2020
Review
73 days
Class
Class II
Product code
IYE
Recalls
2
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 5 generations to K864886 (1987). 9 ancestors in all. No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

  1. Root · 5 generations backK864886 Respigraph-Respisomnograph-RespicentralNims/Respitrace Corp. · 1987
  2. 4 generations backK983629 RPM Respiratory Gating SystemVarian Medical Systems, Inc. · 1999
  3. 3 generations backK063270 RPM Respiratory Gating SystemVarian Medical Systems, Inc. · 2006 · Recalled
  4. 2 generations backK072171 Gatect-RTVision RT Limited · 2007
  5. 1 generation backK113276 CatalystC-Rad Positioning AB · 2012 · Recalled
  6. This deviceK200435 Catalyst+, Catalyst+ HDC-Rad Positioning AB · 2020
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−5K864886Respigraph-Respisomnograph-RespicentralNims/Respitrace Corp.1987—
−4K983629RPM Respiratory Gating SystemVarian Medical Systems, Inc.1999—
−3K063270RPM Respiratory Gating SystemVarian Medical Systems, Inc.20061
−2K072171Gatect-RTVision RT Limited2007—
−1K113276CatalystC-Rad Positioning AB20121
0 (this device)K200435Catalyst+, Catalyst+ HDC-Rad Positioning AB2020—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199920
200610
200910
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K200435, 1987–2020Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in IYE? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new IYE device

  1. #1 K252977 Halcyon, Ethos Radiotherapy System (5.0)score 18.8 · 18 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K113276Catalyst
Summary page 4
…iotherapy positioning system Classification name: Medical charged-particle radiation therapy system Regulation: 21 CFR 892.5050 Predicate marketed device(s): Catalyst (K113276) Device description: The Catalyst+ product consists of projector unit hardware and Windows based software. The product is intend…
C-Rad Positioning AB20121

Also cleared against K113276: 1 other device →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Oct 9, 2025Class IIZ-1092-2026Under Investigation by firmDue to issues with the system's stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) treatment cannot be guaranteed for all couch angles and system setups. n certain cases, the system may indicate the patient as correctly positioned at the isocenter, even…
Apr 22, 2025Class IIZ-1858-2025Software designSoftware issue with scanning equipment that can results in the filed rotation not being applied correctly.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 33 years and passes through 4 companies; a new generation was cleared every 7.5 years on median.
  • 3 of the 9 ancestors have a recall of any class.
  • 1 other device also cites its predicate K113276.

How does its category compare?

All IYE devices

IYE Accelerator, Linear, Medical: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2020, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · IYE

12in 2025

2007: 232008: 142009: 202010: 232011: 112012: 282013: 182014: 202015: 202016: 212017: 232018: 212019: 192020: 202021: 192022: 122023: 182024: 92025: 122026 (partial year): 14
2007high 28 (2012) · low 9 (2024)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · IYE

170in 2025

2007: 44 days median2008: 69 days median2009: 63 days median2010: 74 days median2011: 94 days median2012: 106 days median2013: 88 days median2014: 100 days median2015: 108 days median2016: 97 days median2017: 94 days median2018: 58 days median2019: 83 days median2020: 67 days median2021: 86 days median2022: 172 days median2023: 129 days median2024: 239 days median2025: 170 days median2026 (partial year): 120 days median
2007high 239 (2024) · low 44 (2007)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · IYE

1in 2025

2007: 782008: 492009: 222010: 272011: 732012: 202013: 112014: 142015: 82016: 72017: 72018: 72019: 22020: 42021: 52022: 32023: 72024: 12025: 12026 (partial year): 4
2007high 78 (2007) · low 1 (2024)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · IYE

101in 2025

2007: 1552008: 1142009: 1742010: 2462011: 2802012: 1282013: 962014: 1242015: 1002016: 972017: 1252018: 852019: 912020: 742021: 682022: 662023: 1282024: 812025: 101
2007high 280 (2011) · low 66 (2022)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code IYE, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
2007234478155
2008146949114
2009206322174
2010237427246
2011119473280
20122810620128
201318881196
20142010014124
2015201088100
20162197797
201723947125
20182158785
20191983291
20202067474
20211986568
202212172366
2023181297128
20249239181
2025121701101
2026141204—

What is it indicated for?

The Catalyst+ system and accessories are intended for use in radiation therapy clinics with treatment equipment, to

provide:

• Interactive guidance for setup and positioning of patients for radiation therapy

• Intra-fraction motion detection during radiation therapy

• Respiratory gating during radiation therapy

The device is not intended for use in MR-linac systems.

The system shall only be used by hospital personnel, qualified to work in radiation therapy departments. Training on the

use of the system will be given to users at the time of installation.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K200435: Catalyst+, Catalyst+ HD.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K200435

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026