510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

BONEBRIDGE System, SAMBA 2 BB, SYMFIT 8.0, SAMBA 2 GO, SAMBA 2 Remote

K200504510(k) TraditionalCleared Jul 29, 2020149-day reviewClass II21 CFR 874.3340

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Med-El Elektromedizinische Geraete GmbH · PFO Active Implantable Bone Conduction Hearing System

Cleared on Jul 29, 2020 as substantially equivalent to K183373 (Med-El Elektromedizinische Geraete GmbH, 2019) after a 149-day review. Its family tree reaches back 2 generations to 2018.

Decided
Jul 29, 2020
Review
149 days
Class
Class II
Product code
PFO
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 2 generations to DEN170009 (2018). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

  1. Root · 2 generations backDEN170009 BonebridgeMed-El Elektromedizinische Geraete GmbH · 2018
  2. 1 generation backK183373 BonebridgeMed-El Elektromedizinische Geraete GmbH · 2019
  3. This deviceK200504 BONEBRIDGE System, SAMBA 2 BB, SYMFIT 8.0, SAMBA 2 GO, SAMBA 2 RemoteMed-El Elektromedizinische Geraete GmbH · 2020
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−2DEN170009BonebridgeMed-El Elektromedizinische Geraete GmbH2018—
−1K183373BonebridgeMed-El Elektromedizinische Geraete GmbH2019—
0 (this device)K200504BONEBRIDGE System, SAMBA 2 BB, SYMFIT 8.0, SAMBA 2 GO, SAMBA 2 RemoteMed-El Elektromedizinische Geraete GmbH2020—
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K200504, 2018–2020Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in PFO? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new PFO device

  1. #1 K260902 Cochlear™ Osia® 3(I) Sound Processor;Cochlear™…score 13.1 · 6 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K183373Bonebridge
Summary page 6
…1 2. Predicate Devices Samba BB, SYMFIT 7.0 and Remote Control - MED-EL Elektromedizinische Geraete GmbH (K183373) 3. Device Description The MED-EL BONEBRIDGE System augments hearing by providing acoustic input to the inner ear via bone con…
Med-El Elektromedizinische Geraete GmbH2019—

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 2 years and passes through 1 company; a new generation was cleared every 1.4 years on median.
  • None of the 2 ancestors has a recall.

How does its category compare?

All PFO devices

PFO Active Implantable Bone Conduction Hearing System: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2020, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · PFO

2in 2024

2018: 12019: 42020: 22022: 12023: 12024: 22026 (partial year): 1
2007high 4 (2019) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · PFO

114in 2019

2019: 114 days median
2007high 114 (2019)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · PFO

No recall names PFO since 2007.

Adverse event reports per year · PFO

994in 2025

2018: 22019: 252020: 702021: 2372022: 3062023: 4732024: 7122025: 994
2007high 994 (2025) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code PFO, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—00
20080—00
20090—00
20100—00
20110—00
20120—00
20130—00
20140—00
20150—00
20160—00
20170—00
20181—02
20194114025
20202—070
20210—0237
20221—0306
20231—0473
20242—0712
20250—0994
20261—0—

What is it indicated for?

INTENDED USE: The Bonebridge is intended to improve hearing for patients with conductive or mixed hearing losses, bilateral fitting. and single-sided deafuess. INDICATIONS: The Bonebridge bone conduction hearing implant system is intended for the following patients and indications: - Patients 12 years of age or older. - Patients who have a conductive or mixed hearing loss and still can benefit from sound amplification. The pure tone average (PTA) bone…

Read the full statement (328 words)

INTENDED USE:

The Bonebridge is intended to improve hearing for patients with conductive or mixed hearing losses, bilateral fitting. and single-sided deafuess.

INDICATIONS:

The Bonebridge bone conduction hearing implant system is intended for the following patients and indications:

- Patients 12 years of age or older.

- Patients who have a conductive or mixed hearing loss and still can benefit from sound amplification. The pure tone average (PTA) bone conduction (BC) threshold (measured at 0.5, I, 2 and 3kHz) should be better than or equal to 45 dB HL.

- Bilateral fitting of the Bonebridge is intended for patients having a symmetrically conductive or mixed hearing loss. The difference between the left and right sides' BC thresholds should be less than JO dB on average measured at 0.5, I, 2 and 3kHz, or less than 15 dB at individual frequencies.

- Patients who have profound sensorineural hearing loss in one ear and normal hearing in the opposite ear (i.e., single-sided deafuess or "SSD"). The pure tone average air conduction hearing thresholds of the hearing ear should be better than or equal to 20 dB HL (measured at 0.5, I, 2 and 3kHz).

- The Bonebridge for SSD is also indicated for any patient who is indicated for an air-conduction contralateral routing of signals (AC CROS) hearing aid, but who for some reason cannot or will not use an AC CROS.

- Prior to receiving the device, it is recommended that an individual has experience with appropriately fit air conduction or bone conduction hearing aids.

CONTRAINDICATIONS:

- Chronic or non-revisable vestibular or balance disorders.

- Abnormally progressive hearing loss.

- Evidence of conditions that would prevent good speech recognition potential as determined by good clinical judgment.

- Skin or scalp conditions that may preclude attachment of the audio processor or that may interfere with the use of the audio processor.

- Skull size or abnormality that would preclude appropriate placement of the Bonebridge implant as determined by CT scan.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K200504: BONEBRIDGE System, SAMBA 2 BB, SYMFIT 8.0, SAMBA 2 GO, SAMBA 2 Remote.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K200504

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026