510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

MyPAO Planning Report

K200589510(k) TraditionalCleared Feb 19, 2021350-day reviewClass II21 CFR 892.2050

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Medacta International S.A. · LLZ System, Image Processing, Radiological

Cleared on Feb 19, 2021 as substantially equivalent to K162559 (Biomet, Inc., 2017) after a 350-day review. Its family tree reaches back 6 generations to 1993.

Decided
Feb 19, 2021
Review
350 days
Class
Class II
Product code
LLZ
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 6 generations to K924630 (1993). 7 ancestors in all, the oldest K924810 (1993). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

  1. Root · 6 generations backK924630 Surgicad (TM) View (TM)Surgicad Corp. · 1993
  2. 5 generations backK970617 CT-Modeller SystemMaterialise NV · 1997
  3. 4 generations backK033849 Simplant SystemMaterialise NV · 2004
  4. 3 generations backK073468 MimicsMaterialise NV · 2008
  5. 2 generations backK132636 Dyonics Plan Hip Impingement Planning SystemSmith & Nephew, Inc. · 2013
  6. 1 generation backK162559 Move Forward 3D Motion Simulation ServiceBiomet, Inc. · 2017
  7. This deviceK200589 MyPAO Planning ReportMedacta International S.A. · 2021
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−6K924630Surgicad (TM) View (TM)Surgicad Corp.1993—
−5K970617CT-Modeller SystemMaterialise NV1997—
−4K033849Simplant SystemMaterialise NV2004—
−3K073468MimicsMaterialise NV2008—
−2K132636Dyonics Plan Hip Impingement Planning SystemSmith & Nephew, Inc.2013—
−1K162559Move Forward 3D Motion Simulation ServiceBiomet, Inc.2017—
0 (this device)K200589MyPAO Planning ReportMedacta International S.A.2021—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199310
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K200589, 1993–2021Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in LLZ? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new LLZ device

  1. #1 K230955 syngo Application Softwarescore 21.5 · 11 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K162559Move Forward 3D Motion Simulation Service
Summary page 4
…assification II III. Predicate Device Substantial equivalence is claimed to the following device: x Move Forward 3D Motion Simulation Service, K162559, Biomet Inc. IV. Device Description MyPAO uses the patients’ CT scan to segment the patient’s bones in order to provide…
Biomet, Inc.2017—

Also cleared against K162559: 1 other device →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 28 years and passes through 5 companies; a new generation was cleared every 4.0 years on median.
  • None of the 7 ancestors has a recall.
  • 1 other device also cites its predicate K162559.

How does its category compare?

All LLZ devices

LLZ System, Image Processing, Radiological: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2021, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · LLZ

58in 2025

2007: 762008: 942009: 702010: 512011: 1062012: 822013: 952014: 782015: 642016: 822017: 782018: 1042019: 742020: 812021: 832022: 652023: 872024: 622025: 582026 (partial year): 45
2007high 106 (2011) · low 51 (2010)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · LLZ

173in 2025

2007: 36 days median2008: 52 days median2009: 62 days median2010: 98 days median2011: 79 days median2012: 87 days median2013: 84 days median2014: 89 days median2015: 90 days median2016: 90 days median2017: 107 days median2018: 105 days median2019: 107 days median2020: 115 days median2021: 116 days median2022: 137 days median2023: 157 days median2024: 131 days median2025: 173 days median2026 (partial year): 110 days median
2007high 173 (2025) · low 36 (2007)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · LLZ

11in 2025

2007: 202008: 322009: 212010: 172011: 302012: 122013: 642014: 62015: 162016: 122017: 52018: 72019: 22020: 62021: 32022: 42023: 82024: 62025: 112026 (partial year): 14
2007high 64 (2013) · low 2 (2019)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · LLZ

116in 2025

2007: 1522008: 1542009: 1452010: 1452011: 4542012: 2662013: 1,1302014: 15,6312015: 2112016: 2902017: 1042018: 722019: 882020: 822021: 702022: 282023: 262024: 422025: 116
2007high 15,631 (2014) · low 26 (2023)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code LLZ, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
2007763620152
2008945232154
2009706221145
2010519817145
20111067930454
2012828712266
20139584641,130
20147889615,631
2015649016211
2016829012290
2017781075104
2018104105772
201974107288
202081115682
202183116370
202265137428
202387157826
202462131642
20255817311116
20264511014—

What is it indicated for?

Medacta MyPAO surgical planning report is intended to provide users with patient’s pre-operative information and an estimation of the post-operative parameters after the realignment of the acetabulum following the osteotomy. It is intended to be used for the pre-operative planning phase of Peri-Acetabular Osteotomy surgeries and it consists of a report in .pdf format elaborated on the basis of Patient’s Anatomical Data derived from the CT scan of the…

Read the full statement (140 words)

Medacta MyPAO surgical planning report is intended to provide users with patient’s pre-operative information and an estimation of the post-operative parameters after the realignment of the acetabulum following the osteotomy.

It is intended to be used for the pre-operative planning phase of Peri-Acetabular Osteotomy surgeries and it consists of a report in .pdf format elaborated on the basis of Patient’s Anatomical Data derived from the CT scan of the patient. The planning report is generated through a validated internal Medacta Manufacturing software and with a highly specialized engineering manual landmark selection.

The Medical Device, in accordance with a written prescription of the Surgeon, is intended for the sole use of the specific patient for which the case is created. Medacta MyPAO surgical planning is intended to be used on a skeletally mature population for which a PAO surgery is required.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K200589: MyPAO Planning Report.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K200589

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026