510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Braid

K200822510(k) TraditionalCleared Aug 13, 2020136-day reviewClass II21 CFR 892.2050

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Braid.Health · LLZ System, Image Processing, Radiological

Cleared on Aug 13, 2020 as substantially equivalent to K151957 (Box, Inc., 2015) and 1 other predicate after a 136-day review. Its family tree reaches back 11 generations to 1996. 1 later device descends from it.

Decided
Aug 13, 2020
Review
136 days
Class
Class II
Product code
LLZ
Recalls
None
Predicates
2

Its longest line of descent runs back 11 generations to K954874 (1996). 88 ancestors in all, the oldest K842308 (1984). 1 later device descends from it, 1 citing it directly.

Other ancestors, by year clearedDescendants, by year cleared 2015: 2 other ancestors2013: 1 other ancestor2014: 2 other ancestors2011: 2 other ancestors2006: 2 other ancestors2002: 3 other ancestors2012: 2 other ancestors2004: 6 other ancestors2001: 7 other ancestors1998: 8 other ancestors2008: 1 other ancestor2003: 6 other ancestors1999: 3 other ancestors1997: 4 other ancestors1996: 6 other ancestors1994: 3 other ancestors2005: 1 other ancestor1995: 3 other ancestors1993: 2 other ancestors1991: 6 other ancestors2000: 2 other ancestors1992: 1 other ancestor1984: 2 other ancestors1990: 1 other ancestor1989: 1 other ancestor2023: 1 descendant clearedK954874 · Spectef Protocol · GE Medical Systems · 1996K980914 · Emory Cardiac Tool Box · Emory University · 1998K992450 · Emory Cardiac Toolbox* 2.0 Executing on Nuclear Medicine Computers · Emory University · 1999K014033 · Emory Cardiac Toolbox 2.1 Executing on Nuclear Medicine Computers · Syntermed, Inc. · 2002K040141 · Emory Cardiac Toolbox Version 2.6 · Syntermed, Inc. · 2004K052379 · Mim 3.5 (Circa) · Mimvista Corp. · 2005×2: 2 generations cleared close together, K060816 (2006), K062163 (2006) K103785 · Mobile Mim · Mim Software, Inc. · 2011K143397 · ICIS View · Agfa Healthcare N.V. · 2015K170434 · Enterprise Imaging XERO Viewer 8.1 · Agfa Healthcare N.V. · 2017 · recalled19801990200020102020
  1. Root · 11 generations backK954874 Spectef ProtocolGE Medical Systems · 1996
  2. 7 generations between
  3. 3 generations backK103785 Mobile MimMim Software, Inc. · 2011
  4. 2 generations backK143397 ICIS ViewAgfa Healthcare N.V. · 2015
  5. 1 generation backK170434 Enterprise Imaging XERO Viewer 8.1Agfa Healthcare N.V. · 2017 · Recalled
  6. This deviceK200822 BraidBraid.Health · 2020
  7. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK231385 Rology Teleradiology Platform (v.1.22.1103)Rology, Inc. · 2023
Show all 11 generations
  1. Root · 11 generations backK954874 Spectef ProtocolGE Medical Systems · 1996
  2. 10 generations backK980914 Emory Cardiac Tool BoxEmory University · 1998
  3. 9 generations backK992450 Emory Cardiac Toolbox* 2.0 Executing on Nuclear Medicine ComputersEmory University · 1999
  4. 8 generations backK014033 Emory Cardiac Toolbox 2.1 Executing on Nuclear Medicine ComputersSyntermed, Inc. · 2002
  5. 7 generations backK040141 Emory Cardiac Toolbox Version 2.6Syntermed, Inc. · 2004
  6. 6 generations backK052379 Mim 3.5 (Circa)Mimvista Corp. · 2005
  7. 5 generations backK060816 Mim 4.0 (NeuroMimvista Corp. · 2006 · Recalled
  8. 4 generations backK062163 MimviewerMimvista Corp. · 2006
  9. 3 generations backK103785 Mobile MimMim Software, Inc. · 2011
  10. 2 generations backK143397 ICIS ViewAgfa Healthcare N.V. · 2015
  11. 1 generation backK170434 Enterprise Imaging XERO Viewer 8.1Agfa Healthcare N.V. · 2017 · Recalled
  12. This deviceK200822 BraidBraid.Health · 2020

Most influential descendants

Showing 1 of 1 · See all
  • K231385Rology Teleradiology Platform (v.1.22.1103)Rology, Inc. · 2023 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−11K954874Spectef ProtocolGE Medical Systems1996—
−10K980914Emory Cardiac Tool BoxEmory University1998—
−9K992450Emory Cardiac Toolbox* 2.0 Executing on Nuclear Medicine ComputersEmory University1999—
−8K014033Emory Cardiac Toolbox 2.1 Executing on Nuclear Medicine ComputersSyntermed, Inc.2002—
−7K040141Emory Cardiac Toolbox Version 2.6Syntermed, Inc.2004—
−6K052379Mim 3.5 (Circa)Mimvista Corp.2005—
−5K060816Mim 4.0 (NeuroMimvista Corp.20061
−4K062163MimviewerMimvista Corp.2006—
−3K103785Mobile MimMim Software, Inc.2011—
−2K143397ICIS ViewAgfa Healthcare N.V.2015—
−1K170434Enterprise Imaging XERO Viewer 8.1Agfa Healthcare N.V.20172
0 (this device)K200822BraidBraid.Health2020—
+1K231385Rology Teleradiology Platform (v.1.22.1103)Rology, Inc.2023—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
198420
198910
199010
199160
199210
199320
199430
199530
199660
199740
199880
199930
200020
200170
200230
200360
200460
200510
200620
200810
201120
201220
201310
201420
201520

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
202310
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K200822, 1996–2023Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in LLZ? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new LLZ device

  1. #1 K230955 syngo Application Softwarescore 21.5 · 11 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K151957BOX DICOM Viewer
Summary page 4
…Viewer 8.1 Manufacturer: BOX INC. Agfa HealthCare N.V. 510(k) Number: K151957 K170434 510(k) Summary…
Box, Inc.2015—
*K170434Enterprise Imaging XERO Viewer 8.1
Summary page 4
…Viewer 8.1 Manufacturer: BOX INC. Agfa HealthCare N.V. 510(k) Number: K151957 K170434 510(k) Summary Page 2 of 10 Referen…
Agfa Healthcare N.V.20172

Also cleared against K151957: 1 other device →

What descends from it? (1)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K231385Rology Teleradiology Platform (v.1.22.1103)Rology, Inc.20230

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 24 years and passes through 7 companies; a new generation was cleared every 2.1 years on median.
  • 14 of the 88 ancestors have a recall of any class.
  • Of its descendants, K231385 (Rology, Inc., 2023) has gone furthest, with 0 descendants of its own.
  • 1 other device also cites its predicate K151957.

How does its category compare?

All LLZ devices

LLZ System, Image Processing, Radiological: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2020, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · LLZ

58in 2025

2007: 762008: 942009: 702010: 512011: 1062012: 822013: 952014: 782015: 642016: 822017: 782018: 1042019: 742020: 812021: 832022: 652023: 872024: 622025: 582026 (partial year): 45
2007high 106 (2011) · low 51 (2010)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · LLZ

173in 2025

2007: 36 days median2008: 52 days median2009: 62 days median2010: 98 days median2011: 79 days median2012: 87 days median2013: 84 days median2014: 89 days median2015: 90 days median2016: 90 days median2017: 107 days median2018: 105 days median2019: 107 days median2020: 115 days median2021: 116 days median2022: 137 days median2023: 157 days median2024: 131 days median2025: 173 days median2026 (partial year): 110 days median
2007high 173 (2025) · low 36 (2007)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · LLZ

11in 2025

2007: 202008: 322009: 212010: 172011: 302012: 122013: 642014: 62015: 162016: 122017: 52018: 72019: 22020: 62021: 32022: 42023: 82024: 62025: 112026 (partial year): 14
2007high 64 (2013) · low 2 (2019)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · LLZ

116in 2025

2007: 1522008: 1542009: 1452010: 1452011: 4542012: 2662013: 1,1302014: 15,6312015: 2112016: 2902017: 1042018: 722019: 882020: 822021: 702022: 282023: 262024: 422025: 116
2007high 15,631 (2014) · low 26 (2023)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code LLZ, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
2007763620152
2008945232154
2009706221145
2010519817145
20111067930454
2012828712266
20139584641,130
20147889615,631
2015649016211
2016829012290
2017781075104
2018104105772
201974107288
202081115682
202183116370
202265137428
202387157826
202462131642
20255817311116
20264511014—

What is it indicated for?

Braid is a software teleradiology system used to receive DICOM images, scheduling information and textual reports, organize and store them in an internal format, and to make that information available across a network via web. Braid is used by hospitals, clinics, imaging centers, and radiologist reading practices. Braid can optionally be used for mobile diagnostic use for review and analysis of CR, DX, CT, and MR images and medical reports. Braid mobile…

Read the full statement (174 words)

Braid is a software teleradiology system used to receive DICOM images, scheduling information and textual reports, organize and store them in an internal format, and to make that information available across a network via web. Braid is used by hospitals, clinics, imaging centers, and radiologist reading practices.

Braid can optionally be used for mobile diagnostic use for review and analysis of CR, DX, CT, and MR images and medical reports. Braid mobile diagnostic use is not intended to replace full diagnostic workstations and should only be used when there is no access to a workstation. Braid mobile diagnostic use is not intended for the display of mammography images for diagnosis.

When images are reviewed and use as an element of diagnosis, it is the responsibility of the trained physician to determine if the image quality is suitable for their clinical application.

Contraindications: Braid is not intended for the acquisition of mammographic image data and is meant to be used by qualified medical personnel only who are qualified to create and diagnose radiological image data.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K200822: Braid.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K200822

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026