510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Lascod Impression Materials

K201184510(k) TraditionalCleared May 5, 20204-day reviewClass II21 CFR 872.3660

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Lascod Spa · ELW Material, Impression

Cleared on May 5, 2020 as substantially equivalent to K170736 (Osstem Implant Co., Ltd., 2017) after a 4-day review. Its family tree reaches back 7 generations to 1994.

Decided
May 5, 2020
Review
4 days
Class
Class II
Product code
ELW
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 7 generations to K943574 (1994). 14 ancestors in all. No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

  1. Root · 7 generations backK943574 Capture Impression MaterialDentsply Intl. · 1994
  2. 6 generations backK973782 Aquasil XLV Smart Wetting Impression MaterialDentsply Intl. · 1997
  3. 5 generations backK021410 Aquasil Ultra XLV Smart Wetting Impression MaterialDentsply Intl. · 2002
  4. 4 generations backK082560 Panasil Impression Materials, Including Putty, Binetics, Tray…Kettenbach GmbH & Co. KG · 2008
  5. 3 generations backK133527 Suflex Putty, Suflex Heavy, Suflex Mono, Suflex LightOsstem Germany GmbH · 2014
  6. 2 generations backK151262 Hyflex Heavy, Hyflex Mono, Hyflex LightOsstem Implant Co., Ltd. · 2015
  7. 1 generation backK170736 HySil Impression MaterialsOsstem Implant Co., Ltd. · 2017
  8. This deviceK201184 Lascod Impression MaterialsLascod Spa · 2020
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−7K943574Capture Impression MaterialDentsply Intl.1994—
−6K973782Aquasil XLV Smart Wetting Impression MaterialDentsply Intl.1997—
−5K021410Aquasil Ultra XLV Smart Wetting Impression MaterialDentsply Intl.2002—
−4K082560Panasil Impression Materials, Including Putty, Binetics, Tray, Monophase and…Kettenbach GmbH & Co. KG2008—
−3K133527Suflex Putty, Suflex Heavy, Suflex Mono, Suflex LightOsstem Germany GmbH2014—
−2K151262Hyflex Heavy, Hyflex Mono, Hyflex LightOsstem Implant Co., Ltd.2015—
−1K170736HySil Impression MaterialsOsstem Implant Co., Ltd.2017—
0 (this device)K201184Lascod Impression MaterialsLascod Spa2020—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199610
199710
200220
200510
201010
201610
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K201184, 1994–2020Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in ELW? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new ELW device

  1. #1 K254152 Dia-X Sil Light Bodyscore 14.1 · 8 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K170736HySil Impression Materials
Summary page 4
…Email: [email protected] 5. Predicate Device HySil Impression Materials 510k number K170736 Common Name Impression Material Classification Name Material, Impression R…
Osstem Implant Co., Ltd.2017—

Also cleared against K170736: 5 other devices →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 26 years and passes through 5 companies; a new generation was cleared every 3.3 years on median.
  • 1 of the 14 ancestors has a recall of any class.
  • 5 other devices also cite its predicate K170736.

How does its category compare?

All ELW devices

ELW Material, Impression: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2020, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · ELW

2in 2025

2007: 72008: 112009: 72010: 52011: 92012: 72013: 52014: 112015: 82016: 72017: 32018: 52019: 22020: 42021: 32022: 72023: 22024: 32025: 22026 (partial year): 3
2007high 11 (2008) · low 2 (2019)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · ELW

98in 2024

2007: 60 days median2008: 30 days median2009: 43 days median2010: 88 days median2011: 83 days median2012: 87 days median2013: 67 days median2014: 122 days median2015: 93 days median2016: 166 days median2017: 89 days median2018: 126 days median2020: 99 days median2021: 76 days median2022: 60 days median2024: 98 days median2026 (partial year): 268 days median
2007high 268 (2026) · low 30 (2008)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · ELW

3in 2016

2010: 12012: 12013: 32016: 3
2007high 3 (2013) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · ELW

22in 2025

2007: 92008: 172009: 72010: 162011: 152012: 142013: 322014: 352015: 182016: 152017: 172018: 142019: 242020: 82021: 62022: 92023: 132024: 32025: 22
2007high 35 (2014) · low 3 (2024)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code ELW, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
200776009
20081130017
200974307
2010588116
2011983015
2012787114
2013567332
201411122035
2015893018
20167166315
2017389017
20185126014
20192—024
202049908
202137606
202276009
20232—013
202439803
20252—022
202632680—

What is it indicated for?

The Lascod family of silicone impression materials includes the brand names: Ghenesyl, Kromopan Sil are used by dentists to take the anatomical data of the patient's mouth and subsequently realize a plaster mold useful to diagnose problems, define required interventions, and/or check their effectiveness. The Ghenesyl Putty and Kromopan Sil Putty products are indicated for obtaining preliminary impressions for the two-step putty/wash and base for the…

Read the full statement (209 words)

The Lascod family of silicone impression materials includes the brand names: Ghenesyl, Kromopan Sil are used by dentists to take the anatomical data of the patient's mouth and subsequently realize a plaster mold useful to diagnose problems, define required interventions, and/or check their effectiveness.

The Ghenesyl Putty and Kromopan Sil Putty products are indicated for obtaining preliminary impressions for the two-step putty/wash and base for the sandwich technique. The impression can be electroplated.

The Ghenesyl Body and Kromopan Sil Body products are indicated for the two-step putty/wash and for the sandwich technique. The impression can be electroplated.

The Ghenesyl Mono and Kromopan Sil mono products are indicated for monophasic technique, though it can be used also with Super Light Body / Light Body / Regular Body wash silicones as support material inside individual impression tray or standard stainless-steel impression tray.

Kromopan Sil Bite and Oklurest used by dentists to take impressions of occlusal surfaces in order to confirm the occlusal surfaces onto the plaster models assembled on an articulator.

Kromopan Sil Bite and Oklurest and products are indicated for orthodontic occlusion registration, registration keys for gnathological registrations, inter-maxillary registration keys for centered positions, eruptions and ectopic eruptions, registration for cephalometric analysis which also require subsequent scanning with CAD systems.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K201184: Lascod Impression Materials.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K201184

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026