510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Physiq

K202079510(k) TraditionalCleared Nov 25, 2020121-day reviewClass II21 CFR 890.5850

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

El.En Electronic Engineering Spa · IPF Stimulator, Muscle, Powered

Cleared on Nov 25, 2020 as substantially equivalent to K192249 (InMode, Ltd., 2019) after a 121-day review. Its family tree reaches back 4 generations to 1995. 1 later device descends from it.

Decided
Nov 25, 2020
Review
121 days
Class
Class II
Product code
IPF
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 4 generations to K945509 (1995). 6 ancestors in all. 1 later device descends from it, 1 citing it directly.

Other ancestors, by year clearedDescendants, by year cleared 2004: 1 other ancestor1995: 1 other ancestor2023: 1 descendant clearedK945509 · FX-2 NMS (2CHANNEL Table Model) · Fx-2 · 1995K062354 · Vectra Genisys VMS FR · Encore Medical L.P. · 2007K132284 · Vectra Neo Clinical Therapy System · Djo, LLC · 2014K192249 · InMode System with Tone Applicator · InMode, Ltd. · 20191995200020052010201520202025
Other ancestors, by generationDescendants, by generation 3 generations back: 1 other ancestor4 generations back: 1 other ancestor 1 generation forward: 1 descendant K192249 · InMode System with Tone Applicator · InMode, Ltd. · 2019K132284 · Vectra Neo Clinical Therapy System · Djo, LLC · 2014K062354 · Vectra Genisys VMS FR · Encore Medical L.P. · 2007K945509 · FX-2 NMS (2CHANNEL Table Model) · Fx-2 · 19950
  1. Root · 4 generations backK945509 FX-2 NMS (2CHANNEL Table Model)Fx-2 · 1995
  2. 3 generations backK062354 Vectra Genisys VMS FREncore Medical L.P. · 2007
  3. 2 generations backK132284 Vectra Neo Clinical Therapy SystemDjo, LLC · 2014
  4. 1 generation backK192249 InMode System with Tone ApplicatorInMode, Ltd. · 2019
  5. This deviceK202079 PhysiqEl.En Electronic Engineering Spa · 2020
  6. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK232334 Deka SimonEl.En S.P.A. · 2023

Most influential descendants

Showing 1 of 1 · See all
  • K232334Deka SimonEl.En S.P.A. · 2023 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−4K945509FX-2 NMS (2CHANNEL Table Model)Fx-21995—
−3K062354Vectra Genisys VMS FREncore Medical L.P.2007—
−2K132284Vectra Neo Clinical Therapy SystemDjo, LLC2014—
−1K192249InMode System with Tone ApplicatorInMode, Ltd.2019—
0 (this device)K202079PhysiqEl.En Electronic Engineering Spa2020—
+1K232334Deka SimonEl.En S.P.A.2023—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199510
200410

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
202310
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K202079, 1995–2023Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in IPF? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new IPF device

  1. #1 K241433 EVE Synergy (EVE-20M)score 19.6 · 25 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K192249InMode System with Tone Applicator
Summary page 4
…mulator, nerve, transcutaneous, for pain relief (GZJ) Classification Number: 21 CFR 890.5850 21 CFR 890.5890 Predicate Devices: The InMode System with Tone Applicator (K192249) Device Description: The PHYSIQ is a device provided with 4 handpieces by 2 electrodes each intended to employ EMS (Electrical M…
InMode, Ltd.2019—

Also cleared against K192249: 1 other device →

What descends from it? (1)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K232334Deka SimonEl.En S.P.A.20230

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 25 years and passes through 5 companies; a new generation was cleared every 7.2 years on median.
  • None of the 6 ancestors has a recall.
  • Of its descendants, K232334 (El.En S.P.A., 2023) has gone furthest, with 0 descendants of its own.
  • 1 other device also cites its predicate K192249.

How does its category compare?

All IPF devices

IPF Stimulator, Muscle, Powered: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2020, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · IPF

3in 2025

2007: 82008: 62009: 72010: 42011: 42012: 42013: 102014: 42015: 32016: 72017: 52018: 52019: 42020: 92021: 152022: 72023: 92024: 72025: 32026 (partial year): 3
2007high 15 (2021) · low 3 (2015)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · IPF

257in 2025

2007: 143 days median2008: 140 days median2009: 216 days median2010: 121 days median2011: 275 days median2012: 269 days median2013: 180 days median2014: 264 days median2015: 43 days median2016: 113 days median2017: 110 days median2018: 73 days median2019: 133 days median2020: 121 days median2021: 98 days median2022: 108 days median2023: 255 days median2024: 201 days median2025: 257 days median2026 (partial year): 206 days median
2007high 275 (2011) · low 43 (2015)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · IPF

1in 2023

2008: 12011: 12012: 32023: 1
2007high 3 (2012) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · IPF

8in 2025

2007: 112008: 2132009: 1502010: 142011: 252012: 162013: 62014: 192015: 112016: 82017: 22018: 32019: 102020: 132021: 32022: 42023: 82024: 52025: 8
2007high 213 (2008) · low 2 (2017)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code IPF, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20078143011
200861401213
200972160150
20104121014
20114275125
20124269316
20131018006
20144264019
2015343011
2016711308
2017511002
201857303
20194133010
20209121013
2021159803
2022710804
2023925518
2024720105
2025325708
202632060—

What is it indicated for?

The PHYSIQ device is intended in EMS mode for:

Prevention or retardation of disuse atrophy

Maintaining or increasing range of motion

Muscle re-education

Relaxation of muscle spasms

Increasing local blood circulation

Immediate postsurgical stimulation of calf muscles to prevent venous thrombosis

and in TENS mode for:

Symptomatic relief and management of chronic, intractable pain

Post-surgical acute pain

Post-traumatic acute pain

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K202079: Physiq.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K202079

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026