510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

LC ResinCal PC

K202413510(k) TraditionalCleared Nov 20, 202088-day reviewClass II21 CFR 872.3250

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

S&C Polymer Silicon- Und Composite Spezialitaten GmbH · EJK Liner, Cavity, Calcium Hydroxide

Cleared on Nov 20, 2020 as substantially equivalent to K063237 (Bisco, Inc., 2006) after an 88-day review. Its family tree reaches back 2 generations to 1992.

Decided
Nov 20, 2020
Review
88 days
Class
Class II
Product code
EJK
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 2 generations to K922721 (1992). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

K922721 · VLC Dycal II · Dentsply Intl. · 1992K063237 · Theracal LC · Bisco, Inc. · 20061990199520002005201020152020
  1. Root · 2 generations backK922721 VLC Dycal IIDentsply Intl. · 1992
  2. 1 generation backK063237 Theracal LCBisco, Inc. · 2006
  3. This deviceK202413 LC ResinCal PCS&C Polymer Silicon- Und Composite Spezialitaten GmbH · 2020
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−2K922721VLC Dycal IIDentsply Intl.1992—
−1K063237Theracal LCBisco, Inc.2006—
0 (this device)K202413LC ResinCal PCS&C Polymer Silicon- Und Composite Spezialitaten GmbH2020—
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K202413, 1992–2020Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in EJK? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new EJK device

  1. #1 K261728 One-Fil LCscore 12.3 · 3 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K063237Theracal LC
Summary page 4
…sion. 6. Device for which substantial equivalence is claimed Primary predicate device: TheraCal LC (Bisco) 510(k) number: K063237 (introduced into the US-Market 2006) 7. Device comparison with the predicate device The primary predicate device TheraCal…
Bisco, Inc.2006—

Also cleared against K063237: 3 other devices →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 28 years and passes through 3 companies; a new generation was cleared every 14.4 years on median.
  • None of the 2 ancestors has a recall.
  • 3 other devices also cite its predicate K063237.

How does its category compare?

All EJK devices

EJK Liner, Cavity, Calcium Hydroxide: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2020, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · EJK

1in 2023

2011: 12012: 32013: 12014: 12015: 32018: 12019: 12020: 12021: 12022: 12023: 12026 (partial year): 2
2007high 3 (2012) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · EJK

260in 2015

2012: 93 days median2015: 260 days median
2007high 260 (2015) · low 93 (2012)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · EJK

No recall names EJK since 2007.

Adverse event reports per year · EJK

1in 2022

2012: 42013: 12017: 12018: 22019: 22020: 12022: 1
2007high 4 (2012) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code EJK, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—00
20080—00
20090—00
20100—00
20111—00
201239304
20131—01
20141—00
2015326000
20160—00
20170—01
20181—02
20191—02
20201—01
20211—00
20221—01
20231—00
20240—00
20250—00
20262—0—

What is it indicated for?

1. Pulp capping agent

2. Liner

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K202413: LC ResinCal PC.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K202413

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026