510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

TenoTac Soft Tissue Fixation System

K203385510(k) TraditionalCleared Feb 11, 202185-day reviewClass II21 CFR 888.3040

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Paragon 28, Inc. · MBI Fastener, Fixation, Nondegradable, Soft Tissue

Cleared on Feb 11, 2021 as substantially equivalent to K182898 (Paragon 28, Inc., 2019) after an 85-day review. Its family tree reaches back 6 generations to 1990.

Decided
Feb 11, 2021
Review
85 days
Class
Class II
Product code
MBI
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 6 generations to K904436 (1990). 16 ancestors in all, the oldest K813581 (1982). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

  1. Root · 6 generations backK904436 Quickanchor (TM)Mitek Surgical Products, Inc. · 1990
  2. 5 generations backK962397 Statak Soft Tissue Attachment DeviceZimmer, Inc. · 1996
  3. 4 generations backK973015 Multitak SS Suture SystemBonutti Research · 1997
  4. 3 generations backK071704 Sleeve and Button Soft Tissue DevicesBiomet Sports Medicine, Inc. · 2007
  5. 2 generations backK110145 Biomet Sports Medicine Juggerknot Soft AnchorBiomet, Inc. · 2011 · Recalled
  6. 1 generation backK182898 TenoTac Soft Tissue Fixation SystemParagon 28, Inc. · 2019
  7. This deviceK203385 TenoTac Soft Tissue Fixation SystemParagon 28, Inc. · 2021
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−6K904436Quickanchor (TM)Mitek Surgical Products, Inc.1990—
−5K962397Statak Soft Tissue Attachment DeviceZimmer, Inc.1996—
−4K973015Multitak SS Suture SystemBonutti Research1997—
−3K071704Sleeve and Button Soft Tissue DevicesBiomet Sports Medicine, Inc.2007—
−2K110145Biomet Sports Medicine Juggerknot Soft AnchorBiomet, Inc.20113
−1K182898TenoTac Soft Tissue Fixation SystemParagon 28, Inc.2019—
0 (this device)K203385TenoTac Soft Tissue Fixation SystemParagon 28, Inc.2021—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
198210
199310
199410
199510
199620
199710
199810
200310
200610
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K203385, 1990–2021Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in MBI? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new MBI device

  1. #1 K203268 Arthrex FiberTak Suture Anchorscore 21.4 · 11 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K182898TenoTac Soft Tissue Fixation System
Summary page 4
…on: 21 CFR 888.3040 Class: II Product Code: MBI Predicate Device: The TenoTac® Soft Tissue Fixation System (K182898) serves as the primary predicate device. Reference Device: The Zimmer Biomet (formerly Biomet Sports Medicine) JuggerKnot™ Soft…
Paragon 28, Inc.2019—
†K110145Biomet Sports Medicine Juggerknot Soft AnchorBiomet, Inc.20113

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 31 years and passes through 6 companies; a new generation was cleared every 5.7 years on median.
  • 3 of the 16 ancestors have a recall of any class.

How does its category compare?

All MBI devices

MBI Fastener, Fixation, Nondegradable, Soft Tissue: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2021, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · MBI

27in 2025

2007: 162008: 102009: 192010: 172011: 302012: 242013: 312014: 232015: 232016: 172017: 172018: 162019: 312020: 352021: 182022: 192023: 522024: 222025: 272026 (partial year): 30
2007high 52 (2023) · low 10 (2008)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · MBI

58in 2025

2007: 80 days median2008: 69 days median2009: 82 days median2010: 76 days median2011: 75 days median2012: 94 days median2013: 100 days median2014: 101 days median2015: 85 days median2016: 94 days median2017: 70 days median2018: 91 days median2019: 90 days median2020: 83 days median2021: 107 days median2022: 64 days median2023: 57 days median2024: 30 days median2025: 58 days median2026 (partial year): 63 days median
2007high 107 (2021) · low 30 (2024)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · MBI

1in 2025

2007: 242008: 62009: 22010: 32011: 232012: 62013: 22017: 42018: 22020: 12023: 12024: 12025: 1
2007high 24 (2007) · low 0 (2014)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · MBI

3,826in 2025

2007: 2402008: 3382009: 3552010: 2912011: 3282012: 3712013: 4422014: 5042015: 5072016: 7952017: 6752018: 1,0722019: 1,3032020: 1,4542021: 1,8902022: 1,5912023: 2,5032024: 3,7792025: 3,826
2007high 3,826 (2025) · low 240 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code MBI, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
2007168024240
200810696338
200919822355
201017763291
2011307523328
201224946371
2013311002442
2014231010504
201523850507
201617940795
201717704675
2018169121,072
2019319001,303
2020358311,454
20211810701,890
2022196401,591
2023525712,503
2024223013,779
2025275813,826
202630630—

What is it indicated for?

The TenoTac® Soft Tissue Fixation System is intended to be used for soft tissue to bone fixation. Specific indications for the TenoTac® device include: Foot & Ankle: Medial/lateral repair and reconstruction, mid and forefoot repair, hallux valgus repair, hallux malleus repair and reconstruction, metatarsal ligament/tendon repair and reconstruction including plantar plate attenuation and tear, and the correction of hammer toe, claw toe, mallet toe…

Read the full statement (115 words)

The TenoTac® Soft Tissue Fixation System is intended to be used for soft tissue to bone fixation.

Specific indications for the TenoTac® device include:

Foot & Ankle: Medial/lateral repair and reconstruction, mid and forefoot repair, hallux valgus repair, hallux malleus repair and reconstruction, metatarsal ligament/tendon repair and reconstruction including plantar plate attenuation and tear, and the correction of hammer toe, claw toe, mallet toe, crossover toe, floating toe, and any other lesser toe deformities, correction of metatarsophalangeal joint instability due to shortening from interphalangeal fusion, correction of metatarsophalangeal joint instability due to shortening from Weil osteotomy, Achilles tendon repair.

Hand & Wrist: Collateral ligament repair, Scapholunate ligament reconstruction, tendon transfers in phalanx, Volar plate reconstruction.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K203385: TenoTac Soft Tissue Fixation System.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K203385

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026