510(k) · Cleared
ClearedIncontinence Probe
Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly
Shenzhen Med-Link Electronics Tech Co., Ltd. · KPI Stimulator, Electrical, Non-Implantable, For Incontinence
Cleared on Sep 17, 2021 as substantially equivalent to K161055 (Fuji Dynamics, Ltd., 2016) after a 217-day review. Its family tree reaches back 4 generations to 1989.
- Decided
- Sep 17, 2021
- Review
- 217 days
- Class
- Class II
- Product code
- KPI
- Recalls
- None
- Predicates
- 1
Its longest line of descent runs back 4 generations to K891773 (1989). 6 ancestors in all. No later device cites it as a predicate yet.
- Root · 4 generations backK891773 Microgyn II Elec Stim Device Treat of Urin IncontiHollister, Inc. · 1989
- 3 generations backK970602 Vaginal 2 Electrode Stimulation/Emg Probe-SmallHollister, Inc. · 1997
- 2 generations backK971541 Vaginal 2 Electrode Stimulation/Emg Probe - TamponHollister, Inc. · 1997
- 1 generation backK161055 Fuji Dynamics Incontinence Stimulation Electrode, Models Fuji – 01/…Fuji Dynamics, Ltd. · 2016
- This deviceK210441 Incontinence ProbeShenzhen Med-Link Electronics Tech Co., Ltd. · 2021
View FIG. 1 as a table
Line of descent and top descendants
| Generation | Number | Device | Applicant | Decided | Recalls |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| −4 | K891773 | Microgyn II Elec Stim Device Treat of Urin Inconti | Hollister, Inc. | 1989 | — |
| −3 | K970602 | Vaginal 2 Electrode Stimulation/Emg Probe-Small | Hollister, Inc. | 1997 | — |
| −2 | K971541 | Vaginal 2 Electrode Stimulation/Emg Probe - Tampon | Hollister, Inc. | 1997 | — |
| −1 | K161055 | Fuji Dynamics Incontinence Stimulation Electrode, Models Fuji – 01/ 02/ 03/… | Fuji Dynamics, Ltd. | 2016 | — |
| 0 (this device) | K210441 | Incontinence Probe | Shenzhen Med-Link Electronics Tech Co., Ltd. | 2021 | — |
Other ancestors by year cleared
| Year cleared | Devices | With a Class I recall |
|---|---|---|
| 1995 | 1 | 0 |
| 1999 | 1 | 0 |
Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.
Planning a device in KPI? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.
Top candidate predicates for a new KPI device
- #1 K262353 BTL-299-Fscore 14.8 · 10 generations · no Class I recall
- #2 Held for the reportin the report
- #3 Held for the reportin the report
What was it cleared against? (1)
Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.
| Type | Number | Device | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|
| * | K161055 | Fuji Dynamics Incontinence Stimulation Electrode, Models Fuji – 01/ 02/ 03/ 04/ 05/ 06/…Summary page 4…Device Name Common Name Manufacture 510(k) Fuji Dynamics Incontinence Fuji Dynamics K161055 Incontinence Probe Ltd. Stimulation Electrode… | 2016 |
What descends from it?
No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.
Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)
No FDA recall names this device.
No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.
What does this lineage say?
- The line of descent spans 32 years and passes through 3 companies; a new generation was cleared every 7.6 years on median.
- None of the 6 ancestors has a recall.
How does its category compare?
All KPI devicesKPI Stimulator, Electrical, Non-Implantable, For Incontinence: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2021, this device’s year, is highlighted.
FDA decisions per year · KPI
7so far in 2026, the most since 2007
2026 to Oct 25, outlined.
Median 510(k) review, days · KPI
263in 2025
Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.
Recalls per year · KPI
No recall names KPI since 2007.
Adverse event reports per year · KPI
2in 2024
MAUDE reports naming product code KPI, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.
View these four charts as a table
| Year | Decisions | Median 510(k) review, days | Recalls (Class I) | MAUDE reports |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 1 | — | 0 | 1 |
| 2014 | 3 | 57 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 6 | 260 | 0 | 2 |
| 2016 | 3 | 89 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 1 | — | 0 | 4 |
| 2018 | 3 | 304 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 2 | — | 0 | 2 |
| 2020 | 1 | — | 0 | 3 |
| 2021 | 3 | 217 | 0 | 1 |
| 2022 | 3 | 181 | 0 | 2 |
| 2023 | 3 | 197 | 0 | 6 |
| 2024 | 4 | 172 | 0 | 2 |
| 2025 | 4 | 263 | 0 | 0 |
| 2026 | 7 | 248 | 0 | — |
What is it indicated for?
The Incontinence Probes are intended to provide electromyographic feedback from pelvic musculature or electrical stimulation to pelvic musculature for the purpose of rehabilitation of weak pelvic floor muscles and restoration of neuromuscular control during the treatment of urinary incontinence.
Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.
https://510kreport.com/device/K210441 · printed Nov 6, 2026
Cite this page
510(k) Report. “K210441: Incontinence Probe.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K210441
Report an extraction error
Are you the manufacturer?
Record history
- FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
- Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
- Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
- Page last updated Nov 3, 2026