510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Cohitech Organic Cotton Non-Applicator Cottonlock Tampons

K211775510(k) TraditionalCleared Oct 22, 2021135-day reviewClass II21 CFR 884.5470

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Cotton High Tech S.L. · HEB Tampon, Menstrual, Unscented

Cleared on Oct 22, 2021 as substantially equivalent to K152284 (Cotton High Tech S.L., 2015) after a 135-day review. Its family tree reaches back 4 generations to 2004. 2 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Oct 22, 2021
Review
135 days
Class
Class II
Product code
HEB
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 4 generations to K040999 (2004). 6 ancestors in all, the oldest K954942 (1996). 2 later devices descend from it, 2 citing it directly.

  1. Root · 4 generations backK040999 Tampax Tampons (Junior, Regular, Super and Super Plus Absorbencies)Procter & Gamble Co. · 2004
  2. 3 generations backK061486 Tampax Tampons - (Light,Regular,Super and Super Plus Absorbencies)Procter & Gamble Co. · 2006
  3. 2 generations backK091084 Maxim Menstrual Tampons & Organyc Menstrual TamponsCotton High Tech S.L. · 2009
  4. 1 generation backK152284 Cohitech Non Applicator Organic Cotton Tampons;Cohitech Compact…Cotton High Tech S.L. · 2015
  5. This deviceK211775 Cohitech Organic Cotton Non-Applicator Cottonlock TamponsCotton High Tech S.L. · 2021
  6. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK252939 Cohitech Organic Cotton Compact Applicator TamponsCotton High Tech S.L. · 2025
  7. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK220238 Cohitech Cottonlock Tampons with Reusable ApplicatorCotton High Tech S.L. · 2022

Most influential descendants

Showing 2 of 2 · See all
  • K252939Cohitech Organic Cotton Compact Applicator TamponsCotton High Tech S.L. · 2025 · cites it directly0descendants
  • K220238Cohitech Cottonlock Tampons with Reusable ApplicatorCotton High Tech S.L. · 2022 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−4K040999Tampax Tampons (Junior, Regular, Super and Super Plus Absorbencies)Procter & Gamble Co.2004—
−3K061486Tampax Tampons - (Light,Regular,Super and Super Plus Absorbencies)Procter & Gamble Co.2006—
−2K091084Maxim Menstrual Tampons & Organyc Menstrual TamponsCotton High Tech S.L.2009—
−1K152284Cohitech Non Applicator Organic Cotton Tampons;Cohitech Compact Applicator…Cotton High Tech S.L.2015—
0 (this device)K211775Cohitech Organic Cotton Non-Applicator Cottonlock TamponsCotton High Tech S.L.2021—
+1K252939Cohitech Organic Cotton Compact Applicator TamponsCotton High Tech S.L.2025—
+1K220238Cohitech Cottonlock Tampons with Reusable ApplicatorCotton High Tech S.L.2022—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199610
199910

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
202210
202510
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K211775, 2004–2025Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in HEB? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new HEB device

  1. #1 K251033 Unscented menstrual long applicator tampon…score 14.3 · 6 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K152284Cohitech Non Applicator Organic Cotton Tampons;Cohitech Compact Applicator Organic…
Summary page 4
…Code 510k# Cohitech Non Applicator Organic Cotton Tampons Cotton High Tech S.L. HEB K152284 Cohitech Compact Applicator Organic Cotton Tampons The predicate device ha…
Cotton High Tech S.L.2015—

What descends from it? (2)

2 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K252939Cohitech Organic Cotton Compact Applicator TamponsCotton High Tech S.L.20250
K220238Cohitech Cottonlock Tampons with Reusable ApplicatorCotton High Tech S.L.20220

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 17 years and passes through 2 companies; a new generation was cleared every 5.9 years on median.
  • None of the 6 ancestors has a recall.
  • Of its descendants, K252939 (Cotton High Tech S.L., 2025) has gone furthest, with 0 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All HEB devices

HEB Tampon, Menstrual, Unscented: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2021, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · HEB

6in 2025

2008: 12009: 72010: 32011: 32012: 32013: 22014: 42015: 52016: 12017: 22018: 52019: 72020: 22021: 62022: 32023: 52024: 22025: 62026 (partial year): 1
2007high 7 (2009) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · HEB

82in 2025

2009: 136 days median2010: 76 days median2011: 28 days median2012: 114 days median2014: 173 days median2015: 114 days median2018: 140 days median2019: 182 days median2021: 60 days median2022: 81 days median2023: 109 days median2025: 82 days median
2007high 182 (2019) · low 28 (2011)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · HEB

29in 2025

2010: 12011: 12018: 42025: 29
2007high 29 (2025) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · HEB

452in 2025

2007: 382008: 312009: 302010: 1382011: 2912012: 4162013: 2592014: 1672015: 1322016: 1012017: 1942018: 3632019: 3,0342020: 1,7142021: 1,4032022: 1,0552023: 7022024: 5342025: 452
2007high 3,034 (2019) · low 30 (2009)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code HEB, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—038
20081—031
20097136030
20103761138
20113281291
201231140416
20132—0259
201441730167
201551140132
20161—0101
20172—0194
201851404363
2019718203,034
20202—01,714
202166001,403
202238101,055
202351090702
20242—0534
202568229452
20261—0—

What is it indicated for?

COHITECH Organic Cotton Non-Applicator Cottonlock Tampons (light, regular, super, and super plus absorbencies) are inserted into the vagina and used to absorb menstrual fluid.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K211775: Cohitech Organic Cotton Non-Applicator Cottonlock Tampons.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K211775

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026