510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

OSSIX Breeze

K212509510(k) TraditionalCleared Jul 18, 2022343-day reviewClass II21 CFR 872.3930

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Datum Dental, Ltd. · NPL Barrier, Animal Source, Intraoral

Cleared on Jul 18, 2022 as substantially equivalent to K160281 (Datum Dental, Ltd., 2016) after a 343-day review. Its family tree reaches back 2 generations to 2006.

Decided
Jul 18, 2022
Review
343 days
Class
Class II
Product code
NPL
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 2 generations to K053260 (2006). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

  1. Root · 2 generations backK053260 Ossix -PlusColbar Lifescience, Ltd. · 2006
  2. 1 generation backK160281 Ossix PlusDatum Dental, Ltd. · 2016
  3. This deviceK212509 OSSIX BreezeDatum Dental, Ltd. · 2022
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−2K053260Ossix -PlusColbar Lifescience, Ltd.2006—
−1K160281Ossix PlusDatum Dental, Ltd.2016—
0 (this device)K212509OSSIX BreezeDatum Dental, Ltd.2022—
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K212509, 2006–2022Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in NPL? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new NPL device

  1. #1 K212463 Geistlich Bio-Gide, Geistlich Bio-Gide Shape…score 14.5 · 9 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K160281Ossix Plus
Summary page 4
…me: Barrier, animal source, intraoral (21 CFR 872.3930) Regulatory class: II Product code: NPL III. Predicate Device Primary predicate: OSSIX® Plus (K160281) Reference device: Straumann® Jason® Membrane (K173562) IV. Device Description OSSIX® Breeze cross-linked pericardium membrane…
Datum Dental, Ltd.2016—
†K173562Straumann Jason MembraneInstitut Straumann AG2018—

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 16 years and passes through 2 companies; a new generation was cleared every 10.4 years on median.
  • None of the 2 ancestors has a recall.

How does its category compare?

All NPL devices

NPL Barrier, Animal Source, Intraoral: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2022, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · NPL

5in 2025

2007: 12008: 42009: 32010: 22011: 42013: 22014: 52015: 12016: 32017: 32018: 12019: 12020: 22021: 22022: 32023: 22024: 32025: 5
2007high 5 (2014) · low 0 (2012)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · NPL

132in 2025

2008: 172 days median2009: 193 days median2011: 286 days median2014: 140 days median2016: 184 days median2017: 200 days median2022: 290 days median2024: 263 days median2025: 132 days median
2007high 290 (2022) · low 132 (2025)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · NPL

6in 2019

2012: 32019: 6
2007high 6 (2019) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · NPL

39in 2025

2012: 32013: 22014: 32015: 52016: 92017: 182018: 142019: 222020: 82021: 112022: 192023: 52024: 202025: 39
2007high 39 (2025) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code NPL, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20071—00
2008417200
2009319300
20102—00
2011428600
20120—33
20132—02
2014514003
20151—05
2016318409
20173200018
20181—014
20191—622
20202—08
20212—011
20223290019
20232—05
20243263020
20255132039
20260—0—

What is it indicated for?

OSSIX® Breeze membrane alone or in combination with suitable augmentation materials (like autologous bone or other bone replacement materials) is indicated for immediate or delayed guided bone regeneration (GBR) and guided tissue regeneration (GTR) as a biodegradable membrane for:

1) Alveolar ridge augmentation and reconstruction,

2) Alveolar ridge preservation consequent to tooth extractions,

3) Over the window in sinus elevation procedures and for support of the Schneiderian membrane,

4) In intra bony defects around teeth,

5) Guided tissue regeneration procedures in periodontal defects.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K212509: OSSIX Breeze.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K212509

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026