510(k) · Cleared
ClearedATTUNE Revision Cones
Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly
Depuy Ireland UC · MBH Prosthesis, Knee, Patello/Femorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Porous, Coated, Polymer/Metal/Polymer
Cleared on Oct 17, 2022 as substantially equivalent to K143393 (Stryker Orthopaedics, 2015) and 1 other predicate after a 413-day review. Its family tree reaches back 6 generations to 1998. 1 later device descends from it.
- Decided
- Oct 17, 2022
- Review
- 413 days
- Class
- Class II
- Product code
- MBH
- Recalls
- None
- Predicates
- 2
Its longest line of descent runs back 6 generations to K982302 (1998). 15 ancestors in all. 1 later device descends from it, 1 citing it directly.
- Root · 6 generations backK982302 Implex Continuum Knee - Hedrocel Tibial SpacersImplex Corp. · 1998
- 5 generations backK024161 Nexgen Complete Knee Solution - Trabecular Metal AugmentsImplex Corp. · 2003 · Recalled
- 4 generations backK040487 Trabecular Metal Knee System AugmentsImplex Corp. · 2004 · Recalled
- 3 generations backK053340 Trabecular Metal Tibial and Femoral Cone AugmentsZimmer Trabecular · 2006
- 2 generations backK100391 Depuy Universal Gription TF ConesDePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · 2010
- 1 generation backK143393 Triathlon Tritanium Cone AugmentsStryker Orthopaedics · 2015 · Recalled
- This deviceK212746 ATTUNE Revision ConesDepuy Ireland UC · 2022
- Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK230295 ATTUNE® Revision ConesDepuy Ireland UC · 2023
Most influential descendants
Showing 1 of 1 · See all- K230295ATTUNE® Revision ConesDepuy Ireland UC · 2023 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table
Line of descent and top descendants
| Generation | Number | Device | Applicant | Decided | Recalls |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| −6 | K982302 | Implex Continuum Knee - Hedrocel Tibial Spacers | Implex Corp. | 1998 | — |
| −5 | K024161 | Nexgen Complete Knee Solution - Trabecular Metal Augments | Implex Corp. | 2003 | 2 |
| −4 | K040487 | Trabecular Metal Knee System Augments | Implex Corp. | 2004 | 1 |
| −3 | K053340 | Trabecular Metal Tibial and Femoral Cone Augments | Zimmer Trabecular | 2006 | — |
| −2 | K100391 | Depuy Universal Gription TF Cones | DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. | 2010 | — |
| −1 | K143393 | Triathlon Tritanium Cone Augments | Stryker Orthopaedics | 2015 | 1 |
| 0 (this device) | K212746 | ATTUNE Revision Cones | Depuy Ireland UC | 2022 | — |
| +1 | K230295 | ATTUNE® Revision Cones | Depuy Ireland UC | 2023 | — |
Other ancestors by year cleared
| Year cleared | Devices | With a Class I recall |
|---|---|---|
| 2000 | 1 | 0 |
| 2001 | 1 | 0 |
| 2003 | 1 | 0 |
| 2004 | 3 | 0 |
| 2005 | 2 | 0 |
| 2006 | 1 | 0 |
Descendants by year cleared
| Year cleared | Devices | With a Class I recall |
|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 1 | 0 |
Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.
Planning a device in MBH? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.
Top candidate predicates for a new MBH device
- #1 K241597 Freedom® Total Knee System - Porous Tibial…score 20.0 · 8 generations · no Class I recall
- #2 Held for the reportin the report
- #3 Held for the reportin the report
What was it cleared against? (2)
Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.
| Type | Number | Device | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|
| * | K143393 | Triathlon Tritanium Cone AugmentsSummary page 4…de(s) JWH Primary Predicate: Stryker Triathlon® Tritanium® Cone Augments (K143393) Secondary Predicate: DePuy Universal Gription™ TF Cones & Acetab… | 2015 |
| * | K100391 | Depuy Universal Gription TF ConesSummary page 4…Secondary Predicate: DePuy Universal Gription™ TF Cones & Acetabular Augment System Legally marketed device(s) to (K100391) which equivalence is claimed Reference Devices: DePuy ATTUNE Rev… | 2010 |
| † | K160700 | ATTUNE Revision Knee System | 2016 |
| † | K202194 | ATTUNE® Porous Fixed Bearing Tibial Base, Medialized Dome Patella, and Medialized… | 2020 |
What descends from it? (1)
1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.
| Number | Device | Decided | Descendants |
|---|---|---|---|
| K230295 | ATTUNE® Revision Cones | 2023 | 0 |
Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)
No FDA recall names this device.
No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.
What does this lineage say?
- The line of descent spans 24 years and passes through 5 companies; a new generation was cleared every 4.5 years on median.
- 6 of the 15 ancestors have a recall of any class.
- Of its descendants, K230295 (Depuy Ireland UC, 2023) has gone furthest, with 0 descendants of its own.
- 5 other devices also cite its predicate K143393.
How does its category compare?
All MBH devicesMBH Prosthesis, Knee, Patello/Femorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Porous, Coated, Polymer/Metal/Polymer: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2022, this device’s year, is highlighted.
FDA decisions per year · MBH
8in 2025
2026 to Oct 25, outlined.
Median 510(k) review, days · MBH
98in 2025
Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.
Recalls per year · MBH
1in 2024
Class I (5 since 2007) Class II/III not classified
Adverse event reports per year · MBH
1,561in 2025
MAUDE reports naming product code MBH, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.
View these four charts as a table
| Year | Decisions | Median 510(k) review, days | Recalls (Class I) | MAUDE reports |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 10 | 59 | 0 | 27 |
| 2008 | 3 | 70 | 0 | 21 |
| 2009 | 3 | 209 | 2 | 89 |
| 2010 | 4 | 84 | 0 | 121 |
| 2011 | 5 | 84 | 15 | 247 |
| 2012 | 5 | 90 | 1 (1) | 370 |
| 2013 | 6 | 138 | 4 (4) | 308 |
| 2014 | 9 | 114 | 0 | 385 |
| 2015 | 8 | 100 | 0 | 955 |
| 2016 | 4 | 74 | 1 | 1,034 |
| 2017 | 4 | 115 | 9 | 1,007 |
| 2018 | 6 | 89 | 1 | 1,191 |
| 2019 | 1 | — | 1 | 1,394 |
| 2020 | 7 | 112 | 2 | 1,089 |
| 2021 | 6 | 48 | 0 | 1,539 |
| 2022 | 7 | 57 | 0 | 1,261 |
| 2023 | 6 | 94 | 2 | 1,263 |
| 2024 | 10 | 84 | 1 | 1,497 |
| 2025 | 8 | 98 | 0 | 1,561 |
| 2026 | 7 | 153 | 4 | — |
What is it indicated for?
The ATTUNE Revision Cones are intended for use with the DePuy Revision Knee Systems in a revision total knee replacement surgery for patients suffering from severe pain and disability due to permanent structural damage resulting from rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, posttraumatic arthritis, collagen disorders, pseudogout, trauma or failed prior surgical intervention. The ATTUNE Revision cone is to be fixated into either the proximal tibia or distal…
Read the full statement (105 words)
The ATTUNE Revision Cones are intended for use with the DePuy Revision Knee Systems in a revision total knee replacement surgery for patients suffering from severe pain and disability due to permanent structural damage resulting from rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, posttraumatic arthritis, collagen disorders, pseudogout, trauma or failed prior surgical intervention.
The ATTUNE Revision cone is to be fixated into either the proximal tibia or distal femur with or without bone cement. After implantation of the cone, the mating compatible tibial or femoral component is affixed into the revision cone using bone cement.
THE POROUS TITANIUM ATTUNE REVISION CONES ARE INTENDED FOR CEMENTED OR CEMENTLESS USE.
Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.
https://510kreport.com/device/K212746 · printed Nov 4, 2026
Cite this page
510(k) Report. “K212746: ATTUNE Revision Cones.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K212746
Report an extraction error
Are you the manufacturer?
Record history
- FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
- Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
- Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
- Page last updated Nov 3, 2026