510(k) · Cleared
ClearedMedynus IVA (ACIF, DLIF, PLIF, TLIF, ALIF) PEEK Cage
Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly
Medynus, Inc. · ODP Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Cervical
Cleared on Sep 23, 2021 as substantially equivalent to K162220 (Dio Medical Co., Ltd., 2016) after a 22-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 2016.
- Decided
- Sep 23, 2021
- Review
- 22 days
- Class
- Class II
- Product code
- ODP
- Recalls
- None
- Predicates
- 1
Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K162220 (2016). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.
- Root · 1 generation backK162220 DIO Medical IVA (ACIF, DLIF, PLIF, TLIF,and ALIF) CageDio Medical Co., Ltd. · 2016
- This deviceK212792 Medynus IVA (ACIF, DLIF, PLIF, TLIF, ALIF) PEEK CageMedynus, Inc. · 2021
View FIG. 1 as a table
Line of descent and top descendants
| Generation | Number | Device | Applicant | Decided | Recalls |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| −1 | K162220 | DIO Medical IVA (ACIF, DLIF, PLIF, TLIF,and ALIF) Cage | Dio Medical Co., Ltd. | 2016 | — |
| 0 (this device) | K212792 | Medynus IVA (ACIF, DLIF, PLIF, TLIF, ALIF) PEEK Cage | Medynus, Inc. | 2021 | — |
Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.
Planning a device in ODP? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.
Top candidate predicates for a new ODP device
- #1 K222276 CONDUIT Cages; FIBERGRAFT BG Puttyscore 53.4 · 25 generations · no Class I recall
- #2 Held for the reportin the report
- #3 Held for the reportin the report
What was it cleared against? (1)
Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.
| Type | Number | Device | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|
| * | K162220 | DIO Medical IVA (ACIF, DLIF, PLIF, TLIF,and ALIF) CageSummary page 4…ce, Lumbar (Product Code MAX) Regulation Number: 21 C.F.R. §888.3080 IV. Predicate Devices: DIO Medical IVA (ACIF, DLIF, PLIF, TLIF, ALIF) PEEK Cage (K162220) K212792… | 2016 |
What descends from it?
No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.
Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)
No FDA recall names this device.
No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.
What does this lineage say?
- Its one ancestor has no recall.
- 3 other devices also cite its predicate K162220.
How does its category compare?
All ODP devicesODP Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Cervical: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2021, this device’s year, is highlighted.
FDA decisions per year · ODP
11in 2025
2026 to Oct 25, outlined.
Median 510(k) review, days · ODP
87in 2025
Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.
Recalls per year · ODP
2in 2025
Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified
Adverse event reports per year · ODP
57in 2025
MAUDE reports naming product code ODP, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.
View these four charts as a table
| Year | Decisions | Median 510(k) review, days | Recalls (Class I) | MAUDE reports |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 8 | 89 | 0 | 2 |
| 2009 | 12 | 127 | 1 | 21 |
| 2010 | 9 | 151 | 0 | 54 |
| 2011 | 25 | 113 | 1 | 38 |
| 2012 | 17 | 93 | 0 | 92 |
| 2013 | 18 | 187 | 1 | 78 |
| 2014 | 26 | 118 | 0 | 43 |
| 2015 | 24 | 180 | 0 | 51 |
| 2016 | 17 | 112 | 0 | 37 |
| 2017 | 33 | 104 | 0 | 39 |
| 2018 | 25 | 133 | 0 | 51 |
| 2019 | 22 | 92 | 0 | 141 |
| 2020 | 14 | 89 | 1 | 86 |
| 2021 | 18 | 121 | 0 | 161 |
| 2022 | 12 | 92 | 0 | 50 |
| 2023 | 34 | 165 | 0 | 36 |
| 2024 | 10 | 76 | 0 | 55 |
| 2025 | 11 | 87 | 2 | 57 |
| 2026 | 19 | 117 | 0 | — |
What is it indicated for?
The Medynus IV A (ACIF) PEEK Cage is indicated for intervertebral body fusion in skeletally mature patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) of the cervical spine with accompanying radicular symptoms at one disc level from the C2-C3 disc to the C7-TI disc. DDD is defined as discogenic pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. The device system is designed for use with supplemental fixation and with autograft to…
Read the full statement (193 words)
The Medynus IV A (ACIF) PEEK Cage is indicated for intervertebral body fusion in skeletally mature patients with
degenerative disc disease (DDD) of the cervical spine with accompanying radicular symptoms at one disc level from the
C2-C3 disc to the C7-TI disc. DDD is defined as discogenic pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and
radiographic studies. The device system is designed for use with supplemental fixation and with autograft to facilitate
fusion. Patients should have at least six (6) weeks of non-operative treatment prior to treatment with an intervertebral
cage.
The Medynus IVA (PLIF, TLIF, DLIF and ALIF) PEEK Cage is indicated for intervertebral body fusion of the lumbar
spine, from L2 to S 1, in skeletally mature patients who have had six months of non-operative treatment. The device is
intended for use at one level or two continuous levels for the treatment of degenerative disc disease (DDD) with up to
Grade | spondylolisthesis. DDD is defined as back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by
history and radiographic studies. The device system is designed for use with supplemental fixation and with autograft to
facilitate fusion.
Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.
https://510kreport.com/device/K212792 · printed Nov 6, 2026
Cite this page
510(k) Report. “K212792: Medynus IVA (ACIF, DLIF, PLIF, TLIF, ALIF) PEEK Cage.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K212792
Report an extraction error
Are you the manufacturer?
Record history
- FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
- Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
- Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
- Page last updated Nov 3, 2026