510(k) Report

510(k) · Decided

Decided

ImaJin Silicone double loop ureteral stent kits, ImaJin Pyelostent Silicone double loop ureteral stent kits, ImaJin Stenostent Silicone double loop ureteral stent kits

K213185510(k) TraditionalDecided Jun 8, 2022252-day reviewClass II21 CFR 876.4620

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Coloplast Corp. · FAD Stent, Ureteral

Cleared on Jun 8, 2022 as substantially equivalent to K013921 (Porges S.A., 2002) after a 252-day review. Its family tree reaches back 2 generations to 1988.

Decided
Jun 8, 2022
Review
252 days
Class
Class II
Product code
FAD
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 2 generations to K881744 (1988). 3 ancestors in all. No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

Other ancestors, by generation 2 generations back: 1 other ancestor K013921 · Porges Silicone Double Loop Ureteral Stent, Model # AJ4X / BJ1X / BJ2X · Porges S.A. · 2002K881744 · Porges Ureteral Stent · Bivona Medical Technologies · 19880
  1. Root · 2 generations backK881744 Porges Ureteral StentBivona Medical Technologies · 1988
  2. 1 generation backK013921 Porges Silicone Double Loop Ureteral Stent, Model # AJ4X / BJ1X / BJ2XPorges S.A. · 2002
  3. This deviceK213185 ImaJin Silicone double loop ureteral stent kits, ImaJin Pyelostent…Coloplast Corp. · 2022
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−2K881744Porges Ureteral StentBivona Medical Technologies1988—
−1K013921Porges Silicone Double Loop Ureteral Stent, Model # AJ4X / BJ1X / BJ2XPorges S.A.2002—
0 (this device)K213185ImaJin Silicone double loop ureteral stent kits, ImaJin Pyelostent Silicone…Coloplast Corp.2022—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199810
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K213185, 1988–2022Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in FAD? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new FAD device

  1. #1 K251890 Disposable Ureteral Stentsscore 12.4 · 6 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K013921Porges Silicone Double Loop Ureteral Stent, Model # AJ4X / BJ1X / BJ2X
Summary page 4
…D Regulatory Class: 2 III. PREDICATE AND REFERENCE DEVICES Predicate Device: Porges™ Silicone Double Loop Ureteral Stents, K013921 Reference Device: Silicone Hydro-coated double loop ureteral stent, K180469 The predicate and reference dev…
Porges S.A.2002—
†K180469ImaJin Silicone Hydro-Coated Double Loop Ureteral StentColoplast Corp.2018—

Also cleared against K013921: 1 other device →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 34 years and passes through 3 companies; a new generation was cleared every 19.6 years on median.
  • None of the 3 ancestors has a recall.
  • 1 other device also cites its predicate K013921.

How does its category compare?

All FAD devices

FAD Stent, Ureteral: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2022, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · FAD

4in 2025

2007: 12008: 12010: 12014: 12016: 42017: 82018: 92019: 52020: 12021: 22022: 52024: 12025: 42026 (partial year): 1
2007high 9 (2018) · low 0 (2009)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · FAD

186in 2025

2016: 143 days median2017: 266 days median2018: 258 days median2019: 263 days median2022: 143 days median2025: 186 days median
2007high 266 (2017) · low 143 (2016)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · FAD

4in 2025

2007: 12008: 222009: 22010: 12016: 42019: 62020: 22021: 12022: 92025: 4
2007high 22 (2008) · low 0 (2011)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · FAD

634in 2025

2007: 432008: 762009: 1232010: 782011: 952012: 1312013: 822014: 782015: 1302016: 1822017: 2652018: 2772019: 2612020: 3522021: 5312022: 5592023: 6912024: 6032025: 634
2007high 691 (2023) · low 43 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code FAD, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20071—143
20081—2276
20090—2123
20101—178
20110—095
20120—0131
20130—082
20141—078
20150—0130
201641434182
201782660265
201892580277
201952636261
20201—2352
20212—1531
202251439559
20230—0691
20241—0603
202541864634
20261—0—

What is it indicated for?

Silicone double loop ureteral stents: The Silicone double loop ureteral stents are intended for adult and pediatric (children and adolescents) patients for drainage of the upper urinary tract over fistulas or ureteral obstacles and/or for healing of the ureter. These stents may remain implanted for up to 12 months. Pyelostent and Stenostent Silicone double loop ureteral stents: Drainage of the upper urinary tract and/or ureter healing during management…

Read the full statement (138 words)

Silicone double loop ureteral stents:

The Silicone double loop ureteral stents are intended for adult and pediatric (children and adolescents) patients for drainage of the upper urinary tract over fistulas or ureteral obstacles and/or for healing of the ureter. These stents may remain implanted for up to 12 months.

Pyelostent and Stenostent Silicone double loop ureteral stents:

Drainage of the upper urinary tract and/or ureter healing during management of ureteral stenosis:

For Pyelostent® Silicone double loop ureteral stents:

Partial enlargement of the stent diameter, for localized stenosis of the ureteropelvic junction in adult and pediatric (adolescents) patients.

For Stenostent® Silicone double loop ureteral stents:

Total enlargement of the stent diameter, for ureteral stenosis in adult and pediatric (children and adolescents) patients.

The Pyelostent® and Stenostent® Silicone double loop ureteral stents may remain implanted for up to 12 months.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K213185: ImaJin Silicone double loop ureteral stent kits, ImaJin Pyelostent Silicone double loop ureteral stent kits, ImaJin Stenostent Silicone double loop ureteral stent kits.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K213185

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026