510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · Class II · 2023

exoplan

K213302510(k) TraditionalCleared May 3, 2022211-day reviewClass II21 CFR 892.2050Recalls 1

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Exocad GmbH · LLZ System, Image Processing, Radiological

Cleared on May 3, 2022 as substantially equivalent to K183458 (Exocad GmbH, 2019) after a 211-day review. Its family tree reaches back 10 generations to 1996. It has been recalled once.

Decided
May 3, 2022
Review
211 days
Class
Class II
Product code
LLZ
Recalls
1
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 10 generations to K954678 (1996). 16 ancestors in all, the oldest K924810 (1993). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

  1. Root · 10 generations backK954678 Pro VisionAlgotec Systems, Ltd. · 1996
  2. 6 generations between
  3. 3 generations backK141570 Implant Studio3Shape Medical A/S · 2014
  4. 2 generations backK152078 Implant Studio 20153Shape Medical A/S · 2015
  5. 1 generation backK183458 exoplan 2.3Exocad GmbH · 2019
  6. This deviceK213302 exoplanExocad GmbH · 2022
Show all 10 generations
  1. Root · 10 generations backK954678 Pro VisionAlgotec Systems, Ltd. · 1996
  2. 9 generations backK980648 Pro VisionAlgotec Systems, Ltd. · 1998
  3. 8 generations backK992654 Plug 'N View 3D, Version 1.0Voxar Limited · 1999
  4. 7 generations backK013878 Cybermed, Inc., V-WorksCybermed, Inc. · 2001
  5. 6 generations backK053155 VimplantCybermed, Inc. · 2005
  6. 5 generations backK071636 Codiagnostix (R) 5.72Ivs Solutions AG · 2007 · Recalled
  7. 4 generations backK130724 Codiagnostix Implant Planning SoftwareStraumann USA · 2013
  8. 3 generations backK141570 Implant Studio3Shape Medical A/S · 2014
  9. 2 generations backK152078 Implant Studio 20153Shape Medical A/S · 2015
  10. 1 generation backK183458 exoplan 2.3Exocad GmbH · 2019
  11. This deviceK213302 exoplanExocad GmbH · 2022
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−10K954678Pro VisionAlgotec Systems, Ltd.1996—
−9K980648Pro VisionAlgotec Systems, Ltd.1998—
−8K992654Plug 'N View 3D, Version 1.0Voxar Limited1999—
−7K013878Cybermed, Inc., V-WorksCybermed, Inc.2001—
−6K053155VimplantCybermed, Inc.2005—
−5K071636Codiagnostix (R) 5.72Ivs Solutions AG20072
−4K130724Codiagnostix Implant Planning SoftwareStraumann USA2013—
−3K141570Implant Studio3Shape Medical A/S2014—
−2K152078Implant Studio 20153Shape Medical A/S2015—
−1K183458exoplan 2.3Exocad GmbH2019—
0 (this device)K213302exoplanExocad GmbH2022—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199320
199710
200410
200610
201110
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K213302, 1996–2022Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in LLZ? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new LLZ device

  1. #1 K230955 syngo Application Softwarescore 21.5 · 11 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K183458exoplan 2.3
Summary page 4
…fication Product Code: LLZ Predicate Device exoplan has been compared to the following predicate legally marketed device: 510(k) Number: K183458 Device name: exoplan 2.3 Manufacturer: exocad GmbH, Julius-Reiber-Str. 37, 64293 Darmstadt Referenc…
Exocad GmbH2019—
†K2022563Shape Implant Studio3Shape Medical A/S2020—

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Aug 17, 2023Class IIZ-2633-2023Software designA software library filtering error has been discovered which occurs when users are using the Step-by-Step Full Drill Protocol export functionality of exoplan 3.1 Rijeka. When a guided surgery treatment approach is selected, along with a…

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 26 years and passes through 7 companies; a new generation was cleared every 2.5 years on median.
  • 1 of the 16 ancestors has a recall of any class.

How does its category compare?

All LLZ devices

LLZ System, Image Processing, Radiological: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2022, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · LLZ

58in 2025

2007: 762008: 942009: 702010: 512011: 1062012: 822013: 952014: 782015: 642016: 822017: 782018: 1042019: 742020: 812021: 832022: 652023: 872024: 622025: 582026 (partial year): 45
2007high 106 (2011) · low 51 (2010)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · LLZ

173in 2025

2007: 36 days median2008: 52 days median2009: 62 days median2010: 98 days median2011: 79 days median2012: 87 days median2013: 84 days median2014: 89 days median2015: 90 days median2016: 90 days median2017: 107 days median2018: 105 days median2019: 107 days median2020: 115 days median2021: 116 days median2022: 137 days median2023: 157 days median2024: 131 days median2025: 173 days median2026 (partial year): 110 days median
2007high 173 (2025) · low 36 (2007)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · LLZ

11in 2025

2007: 202008: 322009: 212010: 172011: 302012: 122013: 642014: 62015: 162016: 122017: 52018: 72019: 22020: 62021: 32022: 42023: 82024: 62025: 112026 (partial year): 14
2007high 64 (2013) · low 2 (2019)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · LLZ

116in 2025

2007: 1522008: 1542009: 1452010: 1452011: 4542012: 2662013: 1,1302014: 15,6312015: 2112016: 2902017: 1042018: 722019: 882020: 822021: 702022: 282023: 262024: 422025: 116
2007high 15,631 (2014) · low 26 (2023)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code LLZ, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
2007763620152
2008945232154
2009706221145
2010519817145
20111067930454
2012828712266
20139584641,130
20147889615,631
2015649016211
2016829012290
2017781075104
2018104105772
201974107288
202081115682
202183116370
202265137428
202387157826
202462131642
20255817311116
20264511014—

What is it indicated for?

exoplan is a medical software, intended to support the pre-operative planning of dental implants using the visualization of the implant placement within images of the patient’s anatomy. The process is based on CT/CBCT data sets originating from other medical devices, and can be supported by optical scan(s) of the patient’s anatomy as well as a virtual prosthetic proposal. exoplan allows the design of surgical guides to support the placement of endosseous…

Read the full statement (220 words)

exoplan is a medical software, intended to support the pre-operative planning of dental implants using the visualization of the implant placement within images of the patient’s anatomy. The process is based on CT/CBCT data sets originating from other medical devices, and can be supported by optical scan(s) of the patient’s anatomy as well as a virtual prosthetic proposal. exoplan allows the design of surgical guides to support the placement of endosseous dental implants in guided surgery. The design of surgical guides is based on 3D surface data representing the preoperative situation and approved implant positions. Alternatively, instead of optical surface data a second CBCT/CT dataset can be used. The software exports the planning and design results as geometrical data and a digital 3D model of the surgical guide to support the manufacture of a separate physical product.

exoplan does not extend or change indications of dental implants. Usage of a surgical guide designed with the software does not change the necessary due diligence required compared to conventional (non-guided) surgery.

The software is intended to be used only by dental professionals with sufficient medical training in dental implantology and surgical dentistry in office environments suitable for reading diagnostic dental DICOM data sets. exoplan shall not be used for any purpose other than planning dental implant placement or design of surgical guides.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K213302: exoplan.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K213302

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026