510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Bolt Navigation System

K213768510(k) TraditionalCleared Dec 1, 2022365-day reviewClass II21 CFR 892.1650

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Circinus Medical Technology, LLC · OWB Interventional Fluoroscopic X-Ray System

Cleared on Dec 1, 2022 as substantially equivalent to K200360 (Track X Technology, LLC, 2020) after a 365-day review. Its family tree reaches back 7 generations to 2002.

Decided
Dec 1, 2022
Review
365 days
Class
Class II
Product code
OWB
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 7 generations to K013841 (2002). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

  1. Root · 7 generations backK013841 3DFIS, Model Ies-FL-1013Dsharp, Inc. · 2002
  2. 6 generations backK123226 LessraySaferay Spine, LLC · 2012
  3. 5 generations backK132970 LessraySaferay Spine, LLC · 2013
  4. 4 generations backK142243 LessRay with TrackingSaferay Spine, LLC · 2014
  5. 3 generations backK170800 NuVasive LessRay with Enhanced TrackingNu Vasive, Incorporated · 2017
  6. 2 generations backK173736 TrackXTrack X Technology, LLC · 2018 · Recalled
  7. 1 generation backK200360 TrackXTrack X Technology, LLC · 2020 · Recalled
  8. This deviceK213768 Bolt Navigation SystemCircinus Medical Technology, LLC · 2022
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−7K0138413DFIS, Model Ies-FL-1013Dsharp, Inc.2002—
−6K123226LessraySaferay Spine, LLC2012—
−5K132970LessraySaferay Spine, LLC2013—
−4K142243LessRay with TrackingSaferay Spine, LLC2014—
−3K170800NuVasive LessRay with Enhanced TrackingNu Vasive, Incorporated2017—
−2K173736TrackXTrack X Technology, LLC20182
−1K200360TrackXTrack X Technology, LLC20202
0 (this device)K213768Bolt Navigation SystemCircinus Medical Technology, LLC2022—
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K213768, 2002–2022Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in OWB? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new OWB device

  1. #1 K251602 Alphenix, INFX-8000V/B, INFX-8000V/S, V9.6…score 18.3 · 18 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K200360TrackX
Summary page 5
…gid structures can be identified relative to a perioperative image data of the anatomy and the gravity vector. Predicate Device: The Track X Technology, TrackX Device (K200360) serves as the primary predicate device. The Augmedics xvision Spine System (K190929) and the Medtronic StealthStation (K133444,…
Track X Technology, LLC20202
†K190929xvision Spine system (XVS)Augmedics, Ltd.2019—
†K133444Stealthstation S7 / I7 / Fusion Navigation Systems, Axiem Navigation SystemMedtronic Navigation, Inc.20141
†K170011StealthStation S8 Spine Software v1.0.0Medtronic Navigation2017—

Also cleared against K200360: 1 other device →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 20 years and passes through 5 companies; a new generation was cleared every 2.0 years on median.
  • 2 of the 7 ancestors have a recall of any class.
  • 1 other device also cites its predicate K200360.

How does its category compare?

All OWB devices

OWB Interventional Fluoroscopic X-Ray System: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2022, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · OWB

22in 2025

2007: 32008: 42009: 92010: 72011: 62012: 62013: 112014: 152015: 112016: 162017: 202018: 232019: 92020: 162021: 242022: 212023: 122024: 132025: 222026 (partial year): 15
2007high 24 (2021) · low 3 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · OWB

148in 2025

2007: 52 days median2008: 135 days median2009: 99 days median2010: 66 days median2011: 79 days median2012: 37 days median2013: 119 days median2014: 158 days median2015: 66 days median2016: 103 days median2017: 76 days median2018: 54 days median2019: 174 days median2020: 53 days median2021: 60 days median2022: 90 days median2023: 152 days median2024: 126 days median2025: 148 days median2026 (partial year): 221 days median
2007high 221 (2026) · low 37 (2012)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · OWB

42so far in 2026, the most since 2007

2008: 12013: 102014: 92015: 352016: 132017: 132018: 62019: 72020: 82021: 312022: 242023: 222024: 112025: 302026 (partial year): 42
2007high 42 (2026) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · OWB

14,008in 2025

2007: 12011: 12012: 12013: 272014: 1032015: 2,1342016: 4,0742017: 1,6042018: 1,4492019: 1,5582020: 1,5812021: 1,9812022: 2,9322023: 7,6042024: 7,9422025: 14,008
2007high 14,008 (2025) · low 0 (2008)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code OWB, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
200735201
2008413510
200999900
201076600
201167901
201263701
2013111191027
2014151589103
20151166352,134
201616103134,074
20172076131,604
2018235461,449
2019917471,558
2020165381,581
20212460311,981
20222190242,932
202312152227,604
202413126117,942
2025221483014,008
20261522142—

What is it indicated for?

The Bolt Navigation System assists in the accurate placement of pedicle screws when used in conjunction with an intraoperative fluoroscope. It utilizes intraoperative fluoroscopic and pre- operative MRI or CT axial images to provide surgical planning and navigational telemetry relative to gravity, based on a fixed entry point ascertained by the user and validated by intraoperative fluoroscopic imaging. It is not intended to track patient position. The…

Read the full statement (105 words)

The Bolt Navigation System assists in the accurate placement of pedicle screws when used in conjunction with an intraoperative fluoroscope. It utilizes intraoperative fluoroscopic and pre- operative MRI or CT axial images to provide surgical planning and navigational telemetry relative to gravity, based on a fixed entry point ascertained by the user and validated by intraoperative fluoroscopic imaging. It is not intended to track patient position. The System is indicated for open and minimally invasive pedicle screw placement using a posterior approach in the thoracolumbar and sacral spine (T-9 to S1) where the patients’ relevant rigid anatomical structures can be clearly identified on the imaging.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K213768: Bolt Navigation System.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K213768

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026