510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

MediLab

K221065510(k) TraditionalCleared Jun 10, 202259-day reviewClass II21 CFR 892.2050

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Sigma Scientific Services, LLC · LLZ System, Image Processing, Radiological

Cleared on Jun 10, 2022 as substantially equivalent to K200546 (O3 Enterprise Srl, 2020) after a 59-day review. Its family tree reaches back 2 generations to 2016. 1 later device descends from it.

Decided
Jun 10, 2022
Review
59 days
Class
Class II
Product code
LLZ
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 2 generations to K162011 (2016). 1 later device descends from it, 1 citing it directly.

Descendants, by generation 1 generation forward: 1 descendant K200546 · ZeeroMED View · O3 Enterprise Srl · 2020K162011 · MedDream · Softneta Uab · 20160
  1. Root · 2 generations backK162011 MedDreamSoftneta Uab · 2016
  2. 1 generation backK200546 ZeeroMED ViewO3 Enterprise Srl · 2020
  3. This deviceK221065 MediLabSigma Scientific Services, LLC · 2022
  4. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK223048 Medisystem PacsMedilab Manutencao E Sitemas Ltda · 2023

Most influential descendants

Showing 1 of 1 · See all
  • K223048Medisystem PacsMedilab Manutencao E Sitemas Ltda · 2023 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−2K162011MedDreamSoftneta Uab2016—
−1K200546ZeeroMED ViewO3 Enterprise Srl2020—
0 (this device)K221065MediLabSigma Scientific Services, LLC2022—
+1K223048Medisystem PacsMedilab Manutencao E Sitemas Ltda2023—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
202310
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K221065, 2016–2023Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in LLZ? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new LLZ device

  1. #1 K230955 syngo Application Softwarescore 21.5 · 11 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K200546ZeeroMED View
Summary page 4
…II Panel Radiology Predicate Device Predicate Device: ZeeroMED View Sponsor O3 ENTERPRISE SRL 510(K) K200546 Regulation Number: 892.2050 Regulation Name: Medical image management and image processing System Product Code:…
O3 Enterprise Srl2020—
†K173083Implanter Dental Planning SoftwareImplanter, LLC2018—
†K220590aPROMISE XExini Diagnostics AB2022—

Also cleared against K200546: 2 other devices →

What descends from it? (1)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K223048Medisystem PacsMedilab Manutencao E Sitemas Ltda20230

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 6 years and passes through 3 companies; a new generation was cleared every 3.6 years on median.
  • None of the 2 ancestors has a recall.
  • Of its descendants, K223048 (Medilab Manutencao E Sitemas Ltda, 2023) has gone furthest, with 0 descendants of its own.
  • 2 other devices also cite its predicate K200546.

How does its category compare?

All LLZ devices

LLZ System, Image Processing, Radiological: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2022, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · LLZ

58in 2025

2007: 762008: 942009: 702010: 512011: 1062012: 822013: 952014: 782015: 642016: 822017: 782018: 1042019: 742020: 812021: 832022: 652023: 872024: 622025: 582026 (partial year): 45
2007high 106 (2011) · low 51 (2010)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · LLZ

173in 2025

2007: 36 days median2008: 52 days median2009: 62 days median2010: 98 days median2011: 79 days median2012: 87 days median2013: 84 days median2014: 89 days median2015: 90 days median2016: 90 days median2017: 107 days median2018: 105 days median2019: 107 days median2020: 115 days median2021: 116 days median2022: 137 days median2023: 157 days median2024: 131 days median2025: 173 days median2026 (partial year): 110 days median
2007high 173 (2025) · low 36 (2007)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · LLZ

11in 2025

2007: 202008: 322009: 212010: 172011: 302012: 122013: 642014: 62015: 162016: 122017: 52018: 72019: 22020: 62021: 32022: 42023: 82024: 62025: 112026 (partial year): 14
2007high 64 (2013) · low 2 (2019)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · LLZ

116in 2025

2007: 1522008: 1542009: 1452010: 1452011: 4542012: 2662013: 1,1302014: 15,6312015: 2112016: 2902017: 1042018: 722019: 882020: 822021: 702022: 282023: 262024: 422025: 116
2007high 15,631 (2014) · low 26 (2023)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code LLZ, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
2007763620152
2008945232154
2009706221145
2010519817145
20111067930454
2012828712266
20139584641,130
20147889615,631
2015649016211
2016829012290
2017781075104
2018104105772
201974107288
202081115682
202183116370
202265137428
202387157826
202462131642
20255817311116
20264511014—

What is it indicated for?

MedilLab is intended for use as a diagnostic and analysis tool for diagnostic images for hospitals, imaging centers, radiologists, reading practices and any user who requires and is granted access to patient image, demographic and report information. MediLab displays and manages diagnostic quality DICOM images. MediLab is not intended for diagnostic use with mammography images. Usage for mammography is for reference and referral only. MediLab is not intended for diagnostic use on mobile devices.

Contraindications: MediLab is not intended for the acquisition of mammographic image data and is meant to be used by qualified medical personnel.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K221065: MediLab.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K221065

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026