510(k) · Cleared
Recalled · Class II · 2025FilmArray Pneumonia Panel plus
Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly
Biofire Diagnostics, LLC · QDS Mers-Cov And Common Respiratory Pathogens Semi-Quantitative And Quantitative Multiplex Nucleic Acid Detection System
Cleared on Oct 27, 2022 as substantially equivalent to K181324 (Biofire Diagnostics, LLC, 2018) after a 59-day review. Its family tree reaches back 2 generations to 2017. 1 later device descends from it. It has been recalled once.
- Decided
- Oct 27, 2022
- Review
- 59 days
- Class
- Class II
- Product code
- QDS
- Recalls
- 1
- Predicates
- 1
Its longest line of descent runs back 2 generations to DEN170017 (2017). 1 later device descends from it, 1 citing it directly.
- Root · 2 generations backDEN170017 FilmArray Respiratory Panel 2 plus (RP2plus)Biofire Diagnostics, LLC · 2017
- 1 generation backK181324 FilmArray Pneumonia Panel plusBiofire Diagnostics, LLC · 2018 · Recalled
- This deviceK222601 FilmArray Pneumonia Panel plusBiofire Diagnostics, LLC · 2022
- Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK243222 BIOFIRE® FILMARRAY® Pneumonia Panel (BIOFIRE Pneumonia Panel)…Biofire Diagnostics, LLC (Biomerieux) · 2024 · Recalled
Most influential descendants
Showing 1 of 1 · See all- K243222BIOFIRE® FILMARRAY® Pneumonia Panel (BIOFIRE Pneumonia Panel); BIOFIRE® FILMARRAY®…Biofire Diagnostics, LLC (Biomerieux) · 2024 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table
Line of descent and top descendants
| Generation | Number | Device | Applicant | Decided | Recalls |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| −2 | DEN170017 | FilmArray Respiratory Panel 2 plus (RP2plus) | Biofire Diagnostics, LLC | 2017 | — |
| −1 | K181324 | FilmArray Pneumonia Panel plus | Biofire Diagnostics, LLC | 2018 | 3 |
| 0 (this device) | K222601 | FilmArray Pneumonia Panel plus | Biofire Diagnostics, LLC | 2022 | — |
| +1 | K243222 | BIOFIRE® FILMARRAY® Pneumonia Panel (BIOFIRE Pneumonia Panel); BIOFIRE®… | Biofire Diagnostics, LLC (Biomerieux) | 2024 | 3 |
Descendants by year cleared
| Year cleared | Devices | With a Class I recall |
|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 1 | 0 |
Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.
Planning a device in QDS? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.
Top candidate predicates for a new QDS device
- #1 K243222 BIOFIRE® FILMARRAY® Pneumonia Panel (BIOFIRE…score 6.9 · 3 generations · no Class I recall
What was it cleared against? (1)
Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.
| Type | Number | Device | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|
| * | K181324 | FilmArray Pneumonia Panel plusSummary page 3…MAN SERVICES Form Approved: OMB No. 0910-0120 Fapd e Drug AdminsiEior Expiration Date: 06/30/2023 Indications for Use See PRA Statement below. 510(k) Number (if known) K181324 Device Name BioFire FilmArray Pneumonia Panel plus Indications for Use (Describe) The BioFire® FilmArray® Pneumonia Panel plus… | 2018 |
What descends from it? (1)
1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.
| Number | Device | Decided | Descendants |
|---|---|---|---|
| K243222 | BIOFIRE® FILMARRAY® Pneumonia Panel (BIOFIRE Pneumonia Panel); BIOFIRE® FILMARRAY®… | 2024 | 0 |
Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)
Recalls of this device
| Date | Class | Recall | Root cause | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 2025 | Class II | Z-1518-2025 | Nonconforming Material/Component | Increased risk of control failures and false negative test results with multiplexed nucleic acid test. |
No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.
What does this lineage say?
- The line of descent spans 5 years and passes through 1 company; a new generation was cleared every 3.9 years on median.
- 1 of the 2 ancestors has a recall of any class.
- Of its descendants, K243222 (Biofire Diagnostics, LLC (Biomerieux), 2024) has gone furthest, with 0 descendants of its own.
How does its category compare?
All QDS devicesQDS Mers-Cov And Common Respiratory Pathogens Semi-Quantitative And Quantitative Multiplex Nucleic Acid Detection System: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2022, this device’s year, is highlighted.
FDA decisions per year · QDS
1in 2024
2026 to Oct 25, outlined.
Median 510(k) review, days · QDS
Too few QDS 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.
Recalls per year · QDS
1in 2023
Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified
Adverse event reports per year · QDS
3in 2025
MAUDE reports naming product code QDS, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.
View these four charts as a table
| Year | Decisions | Median 510(k) review, days | Recalls (Class I) | MAUDE reports |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 0 | — | 0 | 1 |
| 2020 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2022 | 1 | — | 0 | 1 |
| 2023 | 0 | — | 1 | 0 |
| 2024 | 1 | — | 0 | 2 |
| 2025 | 0 | — | 0 | 3 |
| 2026 | 0 | — | 1 | — |
What is it indicated for?
The BioFire® FilmArray® Pneumonia Panel plus (BioFire Pneumonia Panel plus) is a multiplexed nucleic acid test intended for use with BioFire® FilmArray® 2.0 (BioFire 2.0) or BioFire® FilmArray® Torch (BioFire Torch) systems for the simultaneous detection and identification of nucleic acids from Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (MERS-CoV) and multiple respiratory viral and bacterial nucleic acids, as well as select antimicrobial resistance…
Read the full statement (999 words)
The BioFire® FilmArray® Pneumonia Panel plus (BioFire Pneumonia Panel plus) is a multiplexed nucleic acid test intended for use with BioFire® FilmArray® 2.0 (BioFire 2.0) or BioFire® FilmArray® Torch (BioFire Torch) systems for the simultaneous detection and identification of nucleic acids from Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (MERS-CoV) and multiple respiratory viral and bacterial nucleic acids, as well as select antimicrobial resistance genes, in sputum-like specimens (induced or expectorated sputum, or endotracheal aspirates) or bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL)-like specimens (BAL or mini-BAL) obtained from individuals meeting MERS-CoV clinical and/or epidemiological criteria.
Testing with BioFire Pneumonia Panel plus should not be performed unless the patient meets clinical and/or epidemiologic criteria for testing suspected MERS-CoV specimens. This includes: clinical signs and symptoms associated with MERS-CoV infection, contact with a probable or confirmed MERS-CoV case, history of travel to geographic locations where MERS-CoV cases were detected, or other epidemiological links for which MERS-CoV testing may be indicated.
The following bacteria are reported semi-quantitatively with bins representing approximately 10⁴, 10⁵, 10⁶, or ≥10⁷ genomic copies of bacterial nucleic acid per milliliter (copies/mL) of specimen, to aid in estimating relative abundance of nucleic acid from these common bacteria within a specimen:
Bacteria reported with bins of 10⁴, 10⁵, 10⁶, or ≥10⁷ copies/mL
• Acinetobacter calcoaceticus-baumannii complex
• Enterobacter cloacae complex
• Escherichia coli
• Haemophilus influenzae
• Klebsiella aerogenes
• Klebsiella oxytoca
• Klebsiella pneumoniae group
• Moraxella catarrhalis
• Proteus spp.
• Pseudomonas aeruginosa
• Serratia marcescens
• Staphylococcus aureus
• Streptococcus agalactiae
• Streptococcus pneumoniae
• Streptococcus pyogenes
The following atypical bacteria, viruses, and antimicrobial resistance genes are reported qualitatively:
Atypical Bacteria
• Chlamydia pneumoniae
• Legionella pneumophila
• Mycoplasma pneumoniae
Viruses
Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV)
• Adenovirus
• Coronavirus
• Human metapneumovirus
• Human rhinovirus/enterovirus
• Influenza A virus
• Influenza B virus
• Parainfluenza virus
• Respiratory syncytial virus
Antimicrobial Resistance Genes
• CTX-M
• IMP
• KPC
• NDM
• OXA-48-like
• VIM
• mecA/C and MREJ (MRSA)
The detection and identification of specific viral and bacterial nucleic acids from MERS-CoV and other respiratory pathogens, as well as the estimation of relative abundance of nucleic acid from common bacterial analytes, within specimens collected from individuals meeting MERS-CoV clinical and/or epidemiological criteria aids in the differential diagnosis of MERS-CoV infection, if used in conjunction with other clinical and epidemiological information in accordance with the guidelines provided by the appropriate public health authorities.
BioFire Pneumonia Panel plus MERS-CoV positive results are for the presumptive identification of MERS-CoV. The definitive identification of MERS-CoV requires additional testing and confirmation procedures in consultation with the appropriate public health authorities (e.g., local or state public health departments, etc.) for whom reporting is necessary. The diagnosis of MERS-CoV infection must be made based on history, signs, symptoms, exposure likelihood, and other laboratory evidence in addition to the identification of MERS-CoV.
BioFire Pneumonia Panel plus MERS-CoV negative results, even in the context of a BioFire Pneumonia Panel plus positive result for one or more of the common respiratory pathogens, do not preclude MERS-CoV infection and should not be used as the sole basis for patient management decisions. The levels of MERS-CoV that would be present in sputum-like or BAL-like specimens from individuals with early infection and from asymptomatic MERS-CoV carriers are not well understood. A negative BioFire Pneumonia Panel plus MERS-CoV result in an asymptomatic individual does not rule out the possibility of future illness and does not demonstrate that the individual is not infectious.
Viral culture should not be attempted on specimens with positive BioFire Pneumonia Panel plus results for MERS-CoV unless a BSL 3 facility is available to receive and culture specimens.
Negative results in the setting of a respiratory illness may be due to infection with pathogens that are not detected by this test, pathogens below the limit of detection, or in the case of bacterial analytes, present at levels below the lowest reported 10⁴ copies/mL bin. Detection of analytes does not rule out co-infection with other organisms; the agent(s) detected by the BioFire Pneumonia Panel plus may not be the definite cause of disease. Additional laboratory testing (e.g. bacterial and viral culture, immunofluorescence, and radiography) may be necessary when evaluating a patient with possible lower respiratory tract infection.
Detection of bacterial nucleic acid may be indicative of colonizing or normal respiratory flora and may not indicate the causative agent of pneumonia. Semi-quantitative Bin (copies/mL) results generated by the BioFire Pneumonia Panel plus are not equivalent to CFU/mL and do not consistently correlate with the quantity of bacterial analytes compared to CFU/mL. For specimens with multiple bacteria detected, the relative abundance of nucleic acids (copies/mL) may not correlate with the relative abundance of bacteria as determined by culture (CFU/mL). Clinical correlation is advised to determine significance of semi-quantitative Bin (copies/mL) for clinical management.
The antimicrobial resistance gene detected may or may not be associated with the agent(s) responsible for disease. Negative results for these antimicrobial resistance gene assays do not indicate susceptibility to corresponding classes of antimicrobials, as multiple mechanisms of antimicrobial resistance exist.
Antimicrobial resistance can occur via multiple mechanisms. A “Not Detected” result for a genetic marker of antimicrobial resistance does not indicate susceptibility to associated antimicrobial drugs or drug classes. A “Detected” result for a genetic marker of antimicrobial resistance cannot be definitively linked to the microorganism(s) detected. Culture is required to obtain isolates for antimicrobial susceptibility testing, and BioFire Pneumonia Panel plus results should be used in conjunction with culture results for determination of bacterial susceptibility or resistance.
Due to the genetic similarity between human rhinovirus and enterovirus, the test cannot reliably differentiate them. A positive Rhinovirus/Enterovirus result should be followed up using an alternate method (e.g., cell culture or sequence analysis) if differentiation is required.
Culture is required to identify pathogens not detected by the BioFire Pneumonia Panel plus, to further speciate analytes in genus, complex, or group results if desired, to identify bacterial pathogens present below the 10⁴ copies/mL bin if desired, and for antimicrobial susceptibility testing.
Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.
https://510kreport.com/device/K222601 · printed Nov 4, 2026
Cite this page
510(k) Report. “K222601: FilmArray Pneumonia Panel plus.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K222601
Report an extraction error
Are you the manufacturer?
Record history
- FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
- Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
- Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
- Page last updated Nov 3, 2026