510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · Class II · 2024

TEMA Elbow system - Line extension

K222807510(k) TraditionalCleared Oct 26, 202240-day reviewClass II21 CFR 888.3160Recalls 1

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Lima Corporate S.P.A. · JDB Prosthesis, Elbow, Semi-Constrained, Cemented

Cleared on Oct 26, 2022 as substantially equivalent to K181362 (Lima Corporate S.P.A., 2019) after a 40-day review. Its family tree reaches back 7 generations to 1989. It has been recalled once.

Decided
Oct 26, 2022
Review
40 days
Class
Class II
Product code
JDB
Recalls
1
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 7 generations to K883665 (1989). 19 ancestors in all. No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

  1. Root · 7 generations backK883665 Coonrad Iii Total ElbowZimmer, Inc. · 1989
  2. 6 generations backK973357 Coonrad/Morrey Total Elbow, New Hinge PinZimmer, Inc. · 1998 · Recalled
  3. 5 generations backK031218 Modification to Tornier Total Elbow ProsthesisTornier · 2003
  4. 4 generations backK070787 Latitude Elbow ProthesisTornier · 2007
  5. 3 generations backK100562 Latitude Elbow ProsthesisTornier, Inc. · 2010 · Recalled
  6. 2 generations backK171010 Latitude EV Total Elbow ArthroplastyTornier, Inc. · 2017
  7. 1 generation backK181362 TEMA Elbow SystemLima Corporate S.P.A. · 2019 · Recalled
  8. This deviceK222807 TEMA Elbow system - Line extensionLima Corporate S.P.A. · 2022
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−7K883665Coonrad Iii Total ElbowZimmer, Inc.1989—
−6K973357Coonrad/Morrey Total Elbow, New Hinge PinZimmer, Inc.19981
−5K031218Modification to Tornier Total Elbow ProsthesisTornier2003—
−4K070787Latitude Elbow ProthesisTornier2007—
−3K100562Latitude Elbow ProsthesisTornier, Inc.20102
−2K171010Latitude EV Total Elbow ArthroplastyTornier, Inc.2017—
−1K181362TEMA Elbow SystemLima Corporate S.P.A.20191
0 (this device)K222807TEMA Elbow system - Line extensionLima Corporate S.P.A.2022—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199610
199810
200020
200130
200530
200910
201310
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K222807, 1989–2022Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in JDB? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new JDB device

  1. #1 K193247 LATITUDE EV™ Total Elbow Arthroplastyscore 1.6 · 7 generations · no Class I recall
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K181362TEMA Elbow System
Summary page 5
…rformed. Predicate Devices: Company Device name Cleared via LIMACORPORATE TEMA Elbow system K181362 Summary of technology comparison: TEMA Elbow system – line extension and TEMA Elbow system (predicate device) have extensive and…
Lima Corporate S.P.A.20191

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Oct 2, 2024Class IIZ-0744-2025Process controlDue to a potential difference in mechanical behavior between the implanted device and tool(s) used during revision surgery.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 33 years and passes through 4 companies; a new generation was cleared every 4.3 years on median.
  • 8 of the 19 ancestors have a recall of any class.

How does its category compare?

All JDB devices

JDB Prosthesis, Elbow, Semi-Constrained, Cemented: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2022, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · JDB

1in 2022

2007: 22010: 22017: 12018: 12020: 12022: 1
2007high 2 (2007) · low 0 (2008)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · JDB

Too few JDB 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.

Recalls per year · JDB

1in 2024

2011: 12024: 1
2007high 1 (2011) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · JDB

38in 2025

2007: 32008: 132009: 102010: 72011: 62012: 62013: 22014: 52015: 442016: 112017: 262018: 392019: 312020: 322021: 232022: 582023: 292024: 1632025: 38
2007high 163 (2024) · low 2 (2013)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code JDB, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20072—03
20080—013
20090—010
20102—07
20110—16
20120—06
20130—02
20140—05
20150—044
20160—011
20171—026
20181—039
20190—031
20201—032
20210—023
20221—058
20230—029
20240—1163
20250—038
20260—0—

What is it indicated for?

TEMA Elbow system is intended for use in cemented applications for patients suffering from disability due to: 1. Elbow joint destruction which significantly compromises the activities of daily living 2. Non-Inflammatory degenerative joint disease including osteoarthritis, and avascular necrosis with hemophilia. 3. Rheumatoid arthritis or degenerative arthritis with incapacitating pain 4. Revision where other devices or treatments have failed. 5.…

Read the full statement (134 words)

TEMA Elbow system is intended for use in cemented applications for patients suffering from disability due to:

1. Elbow joint destruction which significantly compromises the activities of daily living

2. Non-Inflammatory degenerative joint disease including osteoarthritis, and avascular necrosis with hemophilia.

3. Rheumatoid arthritis or degenerative arthritis with incapacitating pain

4. Revision where other devices or treatments have failed.

5. Correction of severe functional deformity.

6. Treatment of acute or chronic fractures with distal humerus epicondyle involvement.

7. Post-traumatic lesions or bone loss contributing to elbow instability or loss of motion

The unlinked, semi-constrained version is for use in cases where there are functioning medial and lateral elbow ligaments of good quality that provide immediate stability, resisting any tendency of dislocation or disengagement between ulnar and humeral components, when intraoperative manual testing is performed.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K222807: TEMA Elbow system - Line extension.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K222807

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026