510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

The Integrity Spine Core System

K223043510(k) TraditionalCleared Mar 20, 2023179-day reviewClass II21 CFR 888.3080

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Integrity Spine · ODP Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Cervical

Cleared on Mar 20, 2023 as substantially equivalent to K132718 (Integrity Spine, 2013) and 1 other predicate after a 179-day review. Its family tree reaches back 13 generations to 2001.

Decided
Mar 20, 2023
Review
179 days
Class
Class II
Product code
ODP
Recalls
None
Predicates
2

Its longest line of descent runs back 13 generations to K003155 (2001). 80 ancestors in all, the oldest K841189 (1984). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

  1. Root · 13 generations backK003155 Vertebral Body ReplacementOsteotech, Inc. · 2001
  2. 9 generations between
  3. 3 generations backK071983 Aesculap Peek Intervertebral Body Fusion System: a Space, Cespace…Aesculap Implant Systems, Inc. · 2008 · Recalled
  4. 2 generations backK130573 Tyber Medical Interbody System; Acif, Alif, Plif, Tlif, DlifTyber Medical, LLC · 2013
  5. 1 generation backK133967 Interbody Cage SystemAurora Spine · 2014
  6. This deviceK223043 The Integrity Spine Core SystemIntegrity Spine · 2023
Show all 13 generations
  1. Root · 13 generations backK003155 Vertebral Body ReplacementOsteotech, Inc. · 2001
  2. 12 generations backK012254 VBROsteotech, Inc. · 2001
  3. 11 generations backK021791 Verte-Stack Spinal SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek · 2002
  4. 10 generations backK023570 Modification to Verte-Stack Spinal SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek · 2002
  5. 9 generations backK031780 Verte-Stack Spinal SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek · 2003
  6. 8 generations backK040731 Stryker Spine Vertebral SpacerStryker Spine · 2004
  7. 7 generations backK042571 Stryker Spine Avs TL Peek SpacerStryker Spine · 2005
  8. 6 generations backK050624 Stryker Spine Avs PL Peek SpacerStryker Spine · 2005
  9. 5 generations backK051205 Stryker Spine Avs Asl Peek SpacerStryker Spine · 2005
  10. 4 generations backK060762 Aesculap Peek Vertebral Body Replacement SystemAesculap, Inc. · 2006
  11. 3 generations backK071983 Aesculap Peek Intervertebral Body Fusion System: a Space, Cespace…Aesculap Implant Systems, Inc. · 2008 · Recalled
  12. 2 generations backK130573 Tyber Medical Interbody System; Acif, Alif, Plif, Tlif, DlifTyber Medical, LLC · 2013
  13. 1 generation backK133967 Interbody Cage SystemAurora Spine · 2014
  14. This deviceK223043 The Integrity Spine Core SystemIntegrity Spine · 2023
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−13K003155Vertebral Body ReplacementOsteotech, Inc.2001—
−12K012254VBROsteotech, Inc.2001—
−11K021791Verte-Stack Spinal SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek2002—
−10K023570Modification to Verte-Stack Spinal SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek2002—
−9K031780Verte-Stack Spinal SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek2003—
−8K040731Stryker Spine Vertebral SpacerStryker Spine2004—
−7K042571Stryker Spine Avs TL Peek SpacerStryker Spine2005—
−6K050624Stryker Spine Avs PL Peek SpacerStryker Spine2005—
−5K051205Stryker Spine Avs Asl Peek SpacerStryker Spine2005—
−4K060762Aesculap Peek Vertebral Body Replacement SystemAesculap, Inc.2006—
−3K071983Aesculap Peek Intervertebral Body Fusion System: a Space, Cespace, Prospace…Aesculap Implant Systems, Inc.20081
−2K130573Tyber Medical Interbody System; Acif, Alif, Plif, Tlif, DlifTyber Medical, LLC2013—
−1K133967Interbody Cage SystemAurora Spine2014—
0 (this device)K223043The Integrity Spine Core SystemIntegrity Spine2023—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
198410
199620
199930
200010
200180
200260
200380
2004100
200570
200740
200850
200960
201010
201120
201220
201310
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K223043, 2001–2023Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in ODP? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new ODP device

  1. #1 K222276 CONDUIT Cages; FIBERGRAFT BG Puttyscore 53.4 · 25 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K132718Integrity Spine Core System
Summary page 4
…sion Device with Bone Graft, Cervical Device Classification: Class II Reviewing Panel: Orthopedic Product Code: ODP Predicate Device: K132718 Integrity Spine Core System Additional Predicate: K133967 Aurora Spine Interbody Fusion System…
Integrity Spine2013—
*K133967Interbody Cage System
Summary page 4
…Class II Reviewing Panel: Orthopedic Product Code: ODP Predicate Device: K132718 Integrity Spine Core System Additional Predicate: K133967 Aurora Spine Interbody Fusion System The predicate devices have not been subject to any design r…
Aurora Spine2014—

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 22 years and passes through 8 companies; a new generation was cleared every 9 months on median.
  • 13 of the 80 ancestors have a recall of any class.

How does its category compare?

All ODP devices

ODP Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Cervical: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2023, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · ODP

11in 2025

2008: 82009: 122010: 92011: 252012: 172013: 182014: 262015: 242016: 172017: 332018: 252019: 222020: 142021: 182022: 122023: 342024: 102025: 112026 (partial year): 19
2007high 34 (2023) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · ODP

87in 2025

2008: 89 days median2009: 127 days median2010: 151 days median2011: 113 days median2012: 93 days median2013: 187 days median2014: 118 days median2015: 180 days median2016: 112 days median2017: 104 days median2018: 133 days median2019: 92 days median2020: 89 days median2021: 121 days median2022: 92 days median2023: 165 days median2024: 76 days median2025: 87 days median2026 (partial year): 117 days median
2007high 187 (2013) · low 76 (2024)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · ODP

2in 2025

2009: 12011: 12013: 12020: 12025: 2
2007high 2 (2025) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · ODP

57in 2025

2008: 22009: 212010: 542011: 382012: 922013: 782014: 432015: 512016: 372017: 392018: 512019: 1412020: 862021: 1612022: 502023: 362024: 552025: 57
2007high 161 (2021) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code ODP, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—00
200888902
200912127121
20109151054
201125113138
20121793092
201318187178
201426118043
201524180051
201617112037
201733104039
201825133051
201922920141
20201489186
2021181210161
20221292050
202334165036
20241076055
20251187257
2026191170—

What is it indicated for?

When used as a cervical intervertebral body fusion device, the Integrity Spine Core System is indicated for intervertebral body fusion in skeletally mature patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) of the cervical spine with accompanying radicular symptoms at one disc level from the C2-C3 disc to the C7-T1 disc. DDD is defined as discogenic pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. The device system is designed for use with supplemental fixation and with autograft to facilitate fusion. Patients should have at least six (6) weeks of non-operative treatment prior to treatment with an intervertebral cage.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K223043: The Integrity Spine Core System.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K223043

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026