510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

OnPoint Augmented Reality Spine System

K231284510(k) TraditionalCleared Sep 8, 2023128-day reviewClass II21 CFR 882.4560

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Onpoint Surgical, Inc. · SBF Orthopedic Augmented Reality

Cleared on Sep 8, 2023 as substantially equivalent to K220905 (Augmedics, Ltd., 2022) after a 128-day review. Its family tree reaches back 7 generations to 2005. 2 of the 10 devices in its family, counting itself, have a Class I recall. 1 later device descends from it.

Decided
Sep 8, 2023
Review
128 days
Class
Class II
Product code
SBF
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 7 generations to K050438 (2005). 8 ancestors in all, the oldest K992927 (1999). 1 later device descends from it, 1 citing it directly. 2 of the 10 devices in this family, counting this one, have a Class I recall.

  1. Root · 7 generations backK050438 Stealthstation System UpdateMedtronic Surgical Navigation Technologies · 2005 · Recalled
  2. 6 generations backK150216 Synergy CranialMedtronic Navigation, Inc. · 2015 · Recalled (Class I)
  3. 5 generations backK153660 StealthStation System with Cranial SoftwareMedtronic Navigation, Inc. · 2016 · Recalled (Class I)
  4. 4 generations backK170011 StealthStation S8 Spine Software v1.0.0Medtronic Navigation · 2017
  5. 3 generations backK190929 xvision Spine system (XVS)Augmedics, Ltd. · 2019
  6. 2 generations backK211188 xvision Spine system (XVS)Augmedics, Ltd. · 2021 · Recalled
  7. 1 generation backK220905 xvision Spine SystemAugmedics, Ltd. · 2022
  8. This deviceK231284 OnPoint Augmented Reality Spine SystemOnpoint Surgical, Inc. · 2023
  9. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK241870 OnPoint Augmented Reality Spine SystemOnpoint Surgical, Inc. · 2024

Class I recalls in this family

Most influential descendants

Showing 1 of 1 · See all
  • K241870OnPoint Augmented Reality Spine SystemOnpoint Surgical, Inc. · 2024 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−7K050438Stealthstation System UpdateMedtronic Surgical Navigation Technologies200511
−6K150216Synergy CranialMedtronic Navigation, Inc.2015Class I
−5K153660StealthStation System with Cranial SoftwareMedtronic Navigation, Inc.2016Class I
−4K170011StealthStation S8 Spine Software v1.0.0Medtronic Navigation2017—
−3K190929xvision Spine system (XVS)Augmedics, Ltd.2019—
−2K211188xvision Spine system (XVS)Augmedics, Ltd.20211
−1K220905xvision Spine SystemAugmedics, Ltd.2022—
0 (this device)K231284OnPoint Augmented Reality Spine SystemOnpoint Surgical, Inc.2023—
+1K241870OnPoint Augmented Reality Spine SystemOnpoint Surgical, Inc.2024—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199910

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
202410
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K231284, 2005–2024Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

2 devices in this family have a Class I recall. A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new SBF device

  1. #1 K193559 NextAR TKA Platformscore 20.3 · 10 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K220905xvision Spine System
Summary page 4
…y Class Class II Product Code OLO Predicate Device Xvision Spine System, manufactured by Augmedics, Ltd. (K220905) Reference Device S8 Stealthstation, manufactured by Medtronic Navigation, Inc. (K201189)…
Augmedics, Ltd.2022—
†K201189Stealthstation S8 Spine Software v1.3.0Medtronic Navigation, Inc.20201

Also cleared against K220905: 2 other devices →

What descends from it? (1)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K241870OnPoint Augmented Reality Spine SystemOnpoint Surgical, Inc.20240

Has anything in its family been recalled? (2 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

Relatives with a Class I recall

Class I is FDA’s most serious recall class. A recall in the family tree is context for this device, not evidence about it.

  • K153660StealthStation System with Cranial SoftwareMedtronic Navigation, Inc. · 2016 · 5 generations back · ◆ on the line of descent in FIG. 13 Class I recalls
  • K150216Synergy CranialMedtronic Navigation, Inc. · 2015 · 6 generations back · ◆ on the line of descent in FIG. 13 Class I recalls

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 18 years and passes through 5 companies; a new generation was cleared every 1.3 years on median.
  • 5 of the 8 ancestors have a recall of any class; 2 have a Class I recall.
  • Of its descendants, K241870 (Onpoint Surgical, Inc., 2024) has gone furthest, with 0 descendants of its own.
  • 2 other devices also cite its predicate K220905.

How does its category compare?

All SBF devices

SBF Orthopedic Augmented Reality: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2023, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · SBF

13in 2025

2019: 12020: 22021: 42022: 72023: 72024: 62025: 132026 (partial year): 3
2007high 13 (2025) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · SBF

90in 2025

2021: 162 days median2022: 234 days median2023: 104 days median2024: 89 days median2025: 90 days median2026 (partial year): 123 days median
2007high 234 (2022) · low 89 (2024)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · SBF

1in 2025

2025: 12026 (partial year): 1
2007high 1 (2025) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · SBF

1in 2025

2025: 1
2007high 1 (2025) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code SBF, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—00
20080—00
20090—00
20100—00
20110—00
20120—00
20130—00
20140—00
20150—00
20160—00
20170—00
20180—00
20191—00
20202—00
2021416200
2022723400
2023710400
202468900
2025139011
202631231—

What is it indicated for?

The OnPoint Augmented Reality Spine System, with OnPoint Augmented Reality Spine System Software, is intended as an aid for precisely locating anatomic structures in either open or percutaneous spine procedures. The use of the OnPoint Augmented Reality Spine System is indicated for any medical condition in which the use of stereotactic surgery may be appropriate, and where reference to a bony anatomical structure, such as the spine or pelvis, can be…

Read the full statement (235 words)

The OnPoint Augmented Reality Spine System, with OnPoint Augmented Reality Spine System Software, is intended as an aid for precisely locating anatomic structures in either open or percutaneous spine procedures. The use of the OnPoint Augmented Reality Spine System is indicated for any medical condition in which the use of stereotactic surgery may be appropriate, and where reference to a bony anatomical structure, such as the spine or pelvis, can be identified relative to CT images of the anatomy. This can include spinal implant procedures, such as pedicle screw placement, where the surgeon wants to see a tracked instrument location in relationship to the stereotaxic display of the CT images of the anatomy.

The optical head mounted display of the OnPoint Augmented Reality Spine System displays 2D stereotaxic screens and an optional virtual anatomy screen, paired with optional graphical targeting tools and alphanumeric displays. The stereotaxic screen is indicated for correlating the tracked instrument location to the registered patient images. The virtual screen is indicated for displaying the virtual instrument location in relation to the virtual anatomy to assist in percutaneous visualization and trajectory planning. The graphical targeting tools and alphanumeric display are indicated for providing visual and quantitative tracking information of the tracked instrument location including deviation from plan.

The virtual display should not be relied upon solely for absolute positional information and should always be used in conjunction with the displayed stereotaxic information.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K231284: OnPoint Augmented Reality Spine System.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K231284

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026