510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

EMPHASYS™ Dual Mobility System

K231522510(k) TraditionalCleared Feb 15, 2024265-day reviewClass II21 CFR 888.3358

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Depuy Ireland UC · LPH Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Polymer, Porous Uncemented

Cleared on Feb 15, 2024 as substantially equivalent to K200854 (Depuy Ireland UC, 2020) and 1 other predicate after a 265-day review. Its family tree reaches back 4 generations to 1999.

Decided
Feb 15, 2024
Review
265 days
Class
Class II
Product code
LPH
Recalls
None
Predicates
2

Its longest line of descent runs back 4 generations to K991990 (1999). 9 ancestors in all. No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

  1. Root · 4 generations backK991990 Tri-Polar SystemBiomet, Inc. · 1999
  2. 3 generations backK070278 Polarcup Dual Mobility SystemPlus Orthopedics AG · 2007
  3. 2 generations backK111572 Novae Sunfit TH Dual Mobility Acetabular Cup Model Sunfit TH…Serf · 2011 · Recalled
  4. 1 generation backK181744 BI-MENTUM dual mobility systemSerf · 2018
  5. This deviceK231522 EMPHASYS™ Dual Mobility SystemDepuy Ireland UC · 2024
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−4K991990Tri-Polar SystemBiomet, Inc.1999—
−3K070278Polarcup Dual Mobility SystemPlus Orthopedics AG2007—
−2K111572Novae Sunfit TH Dual Mobility Acetabular Cup Model Sunfit TH (Metal-Back)…Serf20115
−1K181744BI-MENTUM dual mobility systemSerf2018—
0 (this device)K231522EMPHASYS™ Dual Mobility SystemDepuy Ireland UC2024—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200110
200710
200910
201110
202010
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K231522, 1999–2024Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in LPH? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new LPH device

  1. #1 K233498 Stryker Orthopaedics Hip Systems Labeling Updatescore 24.2 · 20 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K200854DePuy PINNACLE Dual Mobility Liner
Summary page 6
…ual Mobility Dual Mobility Conditional, DePuy SUMMIT Liners Liners Cemented Hip Prosthesis – (K200854) MR Conditional, DePuy SUMMIT FX Cemented Hip…
Depuy Ireland UC2020—
*K181744BI-MENTUM dual mobility system
Summary page 6
…sis – MR Bearing System Conditional, DePuy SUMMIT Heads (K181744) Cemented Hip Prosthesis –…
Serf2018—
†K103233Modular Dual Mobility Liner, X3 Acetabular InsertHowmedica Osteonics Corp.20111
†K150522G7 Dual Mobility SystemBiomet, Inc.20151
†K231873DePuy SUMMIT Porocoat Hip Prosthesis – MR Conditional, DePuy SUMMIT DuoFix Hip…Depuy Ireland UC2024—
†K221636EMPHASYS Acetabular SystemDepuy Ireland UC2022—
†K232667OR3O Dual Mobility LinersSmith & Nephew, Inc.2023—

Also cleared against K200854: 1 other device →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 25 years and passes through 4 companies; a new generation was cleared every 7.3 years on median.
  • 4 of the 9 ancestors have a recall of any class.
  • 1 other device also cites its predicate K200854.

How does its category compare?

All LPH devices

LPH Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Polymer, Porous Uncemented: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2024, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · LPH

12in 2025

2007: 102008: 102009: 32010: 152011: 162012: 252013: 112014: 202015: 182016: 102017: 122018: 92019: 222020: 72021: 82022: 142023: 102024: 62025: 122026 (partial year): 8
2007high 25 (2012) · low 3 (2009)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · LPH

153in 2025

2007: 116 days median2008: 86 days median2009: 112 days median2010: 100 days median2011: 110 days median2012: 76 days median2013: 135 days median2014: 129 days median2015: 111 days median2016: 150 days median2017: 121 days median2018: 145 days median2019: 164 days median2020: 164 days median2021: 410 days median2022: 247 days median2023: 111 days median2024: 92 days median2025: 153 days median2026 (partial year): 256 days median
2007high 410 (2021) · low 76 (2012)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · LPH

4in 2025

2007: 162008: 12009: 22010: 222011: 262012: 302013: 92014: 32015: 12016: 82017: 142018: 22019: 82020: 62021: 42022: 22023: 22024: 12025: 42026 (partial year): 2
2007high 30 (2012) · low 1 (2008)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · LPH

6,163in 2025

2007: 5092008: 7062009: 1,1562010: 2,0072011: 3,3202012: 3,7852013: 5,0022014: 5,1632015: 5,8302016: 4,9002017: 5,3122018: 5,9542019: 7,1302020: 5,4292021: 5,9782022: 5,2232023: 5,3452024: 5,6262025: 6,163
2007high 7,130 (2019) · low 509 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code LPH, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20071011616509
200810861706
2009311221,156
201015100222,007
201116110263,320
20122576303,785
20131113595,002
20142012935,163
20151811115,830
20161015084,900
201712121145,312
2018914525,954
20192216487,130
2020716465,429
2021841045,978
20221424725,223
20231011125,345
202469215,626
20251215346,163
202682562—

What is it indicated for?

Total hip replacement is indicated in the following conditions:

1. A severely painful and/or disabled joint (typically due to non-inflammatory degenerative joint disease).

2. Failed previous hip surgery.

3. Dislocation risks.

EMPHASYS Dual Mobility Liners and Mobile Bearing Heads are intended for cementless applications.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K231522: EMPHASYS™ Dual Mobility System.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K231522

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026