510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

OptiMesh Multiplanar Expandable Interbody Fusion System

K231781510(k) SpecialCleared Oct 18, 2023124-day reviewClass II21 CFR 888.3085

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Spineology, Inc. · OQB Intervertebral Body Graft Containment Device

Cleared on Oct 18, 2023 as substantially equivalent to DEN200010 (Spineology, Inc., 2020) after a 124-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 2020.

Decided
Oct 18, 2023
Review
124 days
Class
Class II
Product code
OQB
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to DEN200010 (2020). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

DEN200010 · Spineology Interbody Fusion System · Spineology, Inc. · 20200
  1. Root · 1 generation backDEN200010 Spineology Interbody Fusion SystemSpineology, Inc. · 2020
  2. This deviceK231781 OptiMesh Multiplanar Expandable Interbody Fusion SystemSpineology, Inc. · 2023
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−1DEN200010Spineology Interbody Fusion SystemSpineology, Inc.2020—
0 (this device)K231781OptiMesh Multiplanar Expandable Interbody Fusion SystemSpineology, Inc.2023—
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K231781, 2020–2023Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in OQB? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new OQB device

  1. #1 K251302 OptiMesh Multiplanar Expandable Interbody…score 18.0 · 26 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*DEN200010Spineology Interbody Fusion System
Summary page 4
…OQB Regulatory Class: Class II Regulation Number: 21 CFR 888.3085 Panel: Orthopedic Predicate Device Primary: DEN200010 Spineology Interbody Fusion System Reference: K192047 Rampart™ One Lumbar Interbody Fusion Sy…
Spineology, Inc.2020—
†K192047Rampart™ One Lumbar Interbody Fusion SystemSpineology, Inc.2019—

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Its one ancestor has no recall.

How does its category compare?

All OQB devices

OQB Intervertebral Body Graft Containment Device: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2023, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · OQB

1in 2025

2020: 12023: 22025: 1
2007high 2 (2023) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · OQB

Too few OQB 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.

Recalls per year · OQB

No recall names OQB since 2007.

Adverse event reports per year · OQB

10in 2025

2021: 12022: 22023: 72024: 62025: 10
2007high 10 (2025) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code OQB, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—00
20080—00
20090—00
20100—00
20110—00
20120—00
20130—00
20140—00
20150—00
20160—00
20170—00
20180—00
20190—00
20201—00
20210—01
20220—02
20232—07
20240—06
20251—010
20260—0—

What is it indicated for?

The OptiMesh Multiplanar Expandable Interbody Fusion System is indicated for use as an adjunct to fusion in an intervertebral body fusion at one level in the lumbar spine from L2 to S1 in skeletally mature patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) with up to Grade T spondylolisthesis at the involved level. DDD is defined as discogenic back pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by patient history, physical examination, and radiographic studies.…

Read the full statement (108 words)

The OptiMesh Multiplanar Expandable Interbody Fusion System is indicated for use as an adjunct to fusion in an intervertebral body fusion at one level in the lumbar spine from L2 to S1 in skeletally mature patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) with up to Grade T spondylolisthesis at the involved level. DDD is defined as discogenic back pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by patient history, physical examination, and radiographic studies. Eligible patients shall have undergone six (6) months of conservative (non-operative) care. The OptiMesh device with compatible allograft and autograft is intended for use with supplemental posterior fixation systems intended for use in the lumbar spine.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K231781: OptiMesh Multiplanar Expandable Interbody Fusion System.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K231781

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026