510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Pulse Oximeter (AOJ-70A); Pulse Oximeter (AOJ-70B); Pulse Oximeter (AOJ-70C); Pulse Oximeter (AOJ-70D); Pulse Oximeter (AOJ-70E)

K232989510(k) TraditionalCleared Jul 1, 2024283-day reviewClass II21 CFR 870.2700

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Shenzhen AOJ Medical Technology Co., Ltd. · DQA Oximeter

Cleared on Jul 1, 2024 after a 283-day review. The summary cites one number, which could not be confirmed as its predicate (see the table below).

Decided
Jul 1, 2024
Review
283 days
Class
Class II
Product code
DQA
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

The summary cites one number, which could not be confirmed as its predicate (see the table below).

FIG. 1 — Lineage of K232989Source: FDA 510(k) database · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in DQA? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new DQA device

  1. #1 K221282 Empatica Health Monitoring Platformscore 20.1 · 38 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary; numbers the summary cites that cannot be its predicate are marked – and kept off the family tree.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
Kept off the family treeK22737AOJ-70A, AOJ-70B, AOJ-70C, AOJ-70D and AOJ-70E Pulse
Number could not be read
*—Pulse Oximeter, A310B, A330B
Named without a submission number
—
†K221039Infrared Thermometer, models AOJ-20A, AOJ-20B, AOJ-20C, AOJ-20D, AOJ-20E, AOJ-20F…Shenzhen AOJ Medical Technology Co., Ltd.2022—

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

How does its category compare?

All DQA devices

DQA Oximeter: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2024, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · DQA

15in 2025

2007: 202008: 222009: 352010: 292011: 152012: 142013: 152014: 112015: 132016: 142017: 92018: 182019: 192020: 152021: 102022: 202023: 132024: 142025: 152026 (partial year): 8
2007high 35 (2009) · low 9 (2017)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · DQA

182in 2025

2007: 122 days median2008: 97 days median2009: 117 days median2010: 127 days median2011: 195 days median2012: 120 days median2013: 182 days median2014: 175 days median2015: 158 days median2016: 246 days median2017: 200 days median2018: 260 days median2019: 158 days median2020: 126 days median2021: 174 days median2022: 265 days median2023: 317 days median2024: 285 days median2025: 182 days median2026 (partial year): 187 days median
2007high 317 (2023) · low 97 (2008)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · DQA

3in 2024

2007: 62008: 52009: 292010: 42011: 12014: 22015: 12018: 322024: 3
2007high 32 (2018) · low 0 (2012)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · DQA

399in 2025

2007: 3252008: 3122009: 2812010: 1852011: 1642012: 3222013: 4682014: 1,1242015: 2,0822016: 1,7752017: 1,1902018: 6942019: 5482020: 4262021: 5532022: 4782023: 3922024: 5452025: 399
2007high 2,082 (2015) · low 164 (2011)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code DQA, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
2007201226325
200822975312
20093511729281
2010291274185
2011151951164
2012141200322
2013151820468
20141117521,124
20151315812,082
20161424601,775
2017920001,190
20181826032694
2019191580548
2020151260426
2021101740553
2022202650478
2023133170392
2024142853545
2025151820399
202681870—

What is it indicated for?

The pulse oximeter is a reusable device and intended for spot-checking of oxygen saturation and pulse rate for use with the finger of adult patients in home and healthcare environments. And it is not intended to be used under motion or low perfusion scenarios.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K232989: Pulse Oximeter (AOJ-70A); Pulse Oximeter (AOJ-70B); Pulse Oximeter (AOJ-70C); Pulse Oximeter (AOJ-70D); Pulse Oximeter (AOJ-70E).” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K232989

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026