510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Medical HAL Lower Limb Type (HAL-ML)

K233695510(k) TraditionalCleared May 7, 2024172-day reviewClass II21 CFR 890.3480

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Cyberdyne, Inc. · PHL Powered Exoskeleton

Cleared on May 7, 2024 as substantially equivalent to K201559 (Cyberdyne, Inc., 2020) after a 172-day review. Its family tree reaches back 3 generations to 2014. 1 later device descends from it.

Decided
May 7, 2024
Review
172 days
Class
Class II
Product code
PHL
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 3 generations to DEN130034 (2014). 1 later device descends from it, 1 citing it directly.

  1. Root · 3 generations backDEN130034 RewalkArgo Medical Technologies, Inc. · 2014
  2. 2 generations backK171909 HAL for Medical Use (Lower Limb Type)Cyberdyne, Inc. · 2017
  3. 1 generation backK201559 HAL for Medical Use (Lower Limb type)Cyberdyne, Inc. · 2020
  4. This deviceK233695 Medical HAL Lower Limb Type (HAL-ML)Cyberdyne, Inc. · 2024
  5. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK254198 Trexo TheoTrexo Robotics, Inc. · 2026

Most influential descendants

Showing 1 of 1 · See all
  • K254198Trexo TheoTrexo Robotics, Inc. · 2026 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−3DEN130034RewalkArgo Medical Technologies, Inc.2014—
−2K171909HAL for Medical Use (Lower Limb Type)Cyberdyne, Inc.2017—
−1K201559HAL for Medical Use (Lower Limb type)Cyberdyne, Inc.2020—
0 (this device)K233695Medical HAL Lower Limb Type (HAL-ML)Cyberdyne, Inc.2024—
+1K254198Trexo TheoTrexo Robotics, Inc.2026—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
202610
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K233695, 2014–2026Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in PHL? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new PHL device

  1. #1 K250904 Atalante Xscore 15.0 · 7 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K201559HAL for Medical Use (Lower Limb type)
Summary page 5
…21 CFR 807.92(a)(3) Predicate # Predicate Trade Name (Primary Predicate is listed first) Product Code K201559 HAL for Medical Use (Lower Limb Type)…
Cyberdyne, Inc.2020—

What descends from it? (1)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K254198Trexo TheoTrexo Robotics, Inc.20260

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 10 years and passes through 2 companies; a new generation was cleared every 3.5 years on median.
  • None of the 3 ancestors has a recall.
  • Of its descendants, K254198 (Trexo Robotics, Inc., 2026) has gone furthest, with 0 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All PHL devices

PHL Powered Exoskeleton: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2024, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · PHL

2in 2025

2014: 12016: 42017: 22018: 22019: 22020: 42021: 12022: 32023: 22024: 12025: 22026 (partial year): 2
2007high 4 (2016) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · PHL

177in 2022

2016: 145 days median2020: 110 days median2022: 177 days median
2007high 177 (2022) · low 110 (2020)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · PHL

1in 2017

2017: 1
2007high 1 (2017) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · PHL

6in 2025

2015: 12016: 42017: 82018: 212020: 32021: 22022: 22023: 12024: 62025: 6
2007high 21 (2018) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code PHL, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—00
20080—00
20090—00
20100—00
20110—00
20120—00
20130—00
20141—00
20150—01
2016414504
20172—18
20182—021
20192—00
2020411003
20211—02
2022317702
20232—01
20241—06
20252—06
20262—0—

What is it indicated for?

Medical HAL Lower Limb Type orthotically fits to the lower limbs and trunk; HAL is a gait training device intended to temporarily help improve ambulation upon completion of the HAL gait training intervention. HAL must be used with a Body Weight Support system. HAL is not intended for sports or stair climbing. HAL gait training is intended to be used in conjunction with regular physiotherapy. The device is intended for individuals with: - spinal cord…

Read the full statement (227 words)

Medical HAL Lower Limb Type orthotically fits to the lower limbs and trunk;

HAL is a gait training device intended to temporarily help improve ambulation upon completion of the

HAL gait training intervention. HAL must be used with a Body Weight Support system. HAL is not

intended for sports or stair climbing. HAL gait training is intended to be used in conjunction with

regular physiotherapy.

The device is intended for individuals with:

- spinal cord injury at levels C4 to L5 (ASIA C, ASIA D) and T1 1 to L5 (ASIA A with Zones of Partial

Preservation, ASIA B);

- post stroke paresis

- paraplegia due to progressive neuromuscular diseases (spinal muscular atrophy, spinal and bulbar

muscular atrophy, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease, distal muscular

dystrophy, inclusion body myositis, congenital myopathy, muscular dystrophy)

-cerebral palsy and are 12 years or older

-spastic paraplegia caused by either HTLV-1 Associated Myelopathy (HAM) or hereditary spastic

paraplegia (HSP)

who exhibit sufficient residual motor and movement-related functions of the hip and knee to trigger

and control HAL.

In preparation for HAL gait training, the controller can be used while the exoskeleton is not donned

to provide biofeedback training through the visualization of surface electromyography bioelectrical

signals recorded.

HAL is intended to be used inside healthcare facilities while under trained medical supervision in

accordance with the user assessment and training certification program.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K233695: Medical HAL Lower Limb Type (HAL-ML).” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 5, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K233695

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026