510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Trilogy Tissue Marker

K240429510(k) TraditionalCleared Nov 7, 2024268-day reviewClass II21 CFR 878.4300

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Inrad, Inc. · NEU Marker, Radiographic, Implantable

Cleared on Nov 7, 2024 as substantially equivalent to K183503 (Inrad, Inc., 2019) after a 268-day review. Its family tree reaches back 3 generations to 1997.

Decided
Nov 7, 2024
Review
268 days
Class
Class II
Product code
NEU
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 3 generations to K970817 (1997). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

  1. Root · 3 generations backK970817 Micromark ClipBiopsys Medical, Inc. · 1997
  2. 2 generations backK993785 Ultraclip Tissue MarkerInrad · 2000 · Recalled
  3. 1 generation backK183503 EasyMark Tissue MarkerInrad, Inc. · 2019
  4. This deviceK240429 Trilogy Tissue MarkerInrad, Inc. · 2024
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−3K970817Micromark ClipBiopsys Medical, Inc.1997—
−2K993785Ultraclip Tissue MarkerInrad20001
−1K183503EasyMark Tissue MarkerInrad, Inc.2019—
0 (this device)K240429Trilogy Tissue MarkerInrad, Inc.2024—
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K240429, 1997–2024Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in NEU? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new NEU device

  1. #1 K240042 MOLLI 2 Systemscore 14.4 · 12 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K183503EasyMark Tissue Marker
Summary page 5
…REDICATE DEVICE The INRAD, Inc. Trilogy Tissue Marker [subject device] is substantially equivalent (SE) to the Sponsor’s own predicate device: EasyMark™ Tissue Marker, K183503 This predicate device has not been subject to a design related recall. Reference Device: SelectCore Biopsy Device, K093256 This…
Inrad, Inc.2019—
†K093256Selectcore Variable Throw Biopsy Device Model 991014, 991514, 991018, 991518, 992018Inrad2009—

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 27 years and passes through 3 companies; a new generation was cleared every 5.1 years on median.
  • 1 of the 3 ancestors has a recall of any class.

How does its category compare?

All NEU devices

NEU Marker, Radiographic, Implantable: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2024, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · NEU

5in 2025

2007: 42008: 72009: 42010: 52011: 32012: 32013: 72014: 32015: 72016: 22017: 42018: 82019: 52020: 32021: 32022: 22023: 42024: 102025: 52026 (partial year): 1
2007high 10 (2024) · low 2 (2016)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · NEU

99in 2025

2007: 94 days median2008: 107 days median2009: 70 days median2010: 69 days median2011: 145 days median2012: 120 days median2013: 49 days median2014: 48 days median2015: 111 days median2017: 115 days median2018: 89 days median2019: 149 days median2020: 169 days median2021: 46 days median2023: 136 days median2024: 267 days median2025: 99 days median
2007high 267 (2024) · low 46 (2021)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · NEU

2in 2025

2011: 12017: 12022: 12024: 2, 1 Class I2025: 22026 (partial year): 2
2007high 2 (2024) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (1 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · NEU

411in 2025

2007: 52008: 52009: 302010: 122011: 182012: 542013: 602014: 382015: 1202016: 562017: 692018: 662019: 582020: 452021: 822022: 1002023: 1422024: 2472025: 411
2007high 411 (2025) · low 5 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code NEU, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
200749405
2008710705
2009470030
2010569012
20113145118
20123120054
2013749060
2014348038
201571110120
20162—056
20174115169
2018889066
20195149058
20203169045
2021346082
20222—1100
202341360142
2024102672 (1)247
20255992411
20261—2—

What is it indicated for?

The Trilogy Tissue Marker is intended for use to attach to breast tissue at the surgical site during an open surgical breast biopsy or percutaneous breast biopsy to radiographically mark the location of the biopsy procedure, and be permanently visible under MRI, x-ray and ultrasound.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K240429: Trilogy Tissue Marker.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 5, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K240429

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026