510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · Class II · 2025

Leos Laser and Endoscopy System

K240615510(k) TraditionalCleared Apr 3, 2025394-day reviewClass II21 CFR 886.4390Recalls 1

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Beaver-Visitec International, Inc. · HQF Laser, Ophthalmic

Cleared on Apr 3, 2025 as substantially equivalent to K910532 (Martin S. Knopf Assoc., Inc., 1991) and 1 other predicate after a 394-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 1991. It has been recalled once.

Decided
Apr 3, 2025
Review
394 days
Class
Class II
Product code
HQF
Recalls
1
Predicates
2

Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K910532 (1991). 2 ancestors in all. No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

Other ancestors, by year cleared 2004: 1 other ancestorK910532 · Uram Ophthalmic Laser Endoscope · Martin S. Knopf Assoc., Inc. · 19911990200020102020
Other ancestors, by generation 1 generation back: 1 other ancestor K910532 · Uram Ophthalmic Laser Endoscope · Martin S. Knopf Assoc., Inc. · 19910
  1. Root · 1 generation backK910532 Uram Ophthalmic Laser EndoscopeMartin S. Knopf Assoc., Inc. · 1991
  2. This deviceK240615 Leos Laser and Endoscopy SystemBeaver-Visitec International, Inc. · 2025
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−1K910532Uram Ophthalmic Laser EndoscopeMartin S. Knopf Assoc., Inc.1991—
0 (this device)K240615Leos Laser and Endoscopy SystemBeaver-Visitec International, Inc.2025—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200410
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K240615, 1991–2025Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in HQF? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new HQF device

  1. #1 K251772 Navilas Laser System 577sl (156691)score 13.6 · 12 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K910532Uram Ophthalmic Laser Endoscope
Summary page 5
…Device Common Name Ophthalmic Laser and Endoscopy System Trade/Proprietary Name Uram Ophthalmic Laser Endoscope 510(k) Number K910532 Device Class Class 2 Regulation Number 886.4390 – Ophthalmic laser Product Code…
Martin S. Knopf Assoc., Inc.1991—
*K042918Microprobe Laser and Endoscopy System, Model E2
Summary page 5
…mmon Name Ophthalmic Laser and Endoscopy System Trade/Proprietary Name E2 Microprobe Laser and Endoscopy System 510(k) Number K042918 Device Class Class 2 Regulation Number 878.4810 – Laser surgical instrument for use in gener…
Endooptiks, Inc.2004—

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Dec 5, 2025Class IIZ-1008-2026Process controlManufacturing deviation in which the ferrites specified for the USB cable assembly linking the Nurse Monitor touchscreen to the System Controller were not installed as intended. The omission of the ferrites on the USB communication cable…

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • None of the 2 ancestors has a recall.

How does its category compare?

All HQF devices

HQF Laser, Ophthalmic: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2025, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · HQF

3in 2025

2007: 42008: 32009: 72010: 22011: 42012: 52013: 62014: 32015: 42016: 32017: 32018: 12019: 42020: 42021: 12022: 72023: 52024: 32025: 32026 (partial year): 2
2007high 7 (2009) · low 1 (2018)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · HQF

264in 2025

2007: 198 days median2008: 28 days median2009: 115 days median2011: 128 days median2012: 179 days median2013: 225 days median2014: 215 days median2015: 295 days median2016: 271 days median2017: 189 days median2019: 107 days median2020: 53 days median2022: 86 days median2023: 155 days median2024: 167 days median2025: 264 days median
2007high 295 (2015) · low 28 (2008)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · HQF

1in 2025

2007: 22008: 12009: 22010: 32011: 52012: 12013: 22014: 42025: 1
2007high 5 (2011) · low 0 (2015)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · HQF

106in 2025

2007: 602008: 342009: 332010: 432011: 262012: 412013: 392014: 582015: 802016: 1082017: 772018: 822019: 662020: 722021: 1002022: 1112023: 922024: 752025: 106
2007high 111 (2022) · low 26 (2011)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code HQF, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20074198260
2008328134
20097115233
20102—343
20114128526
20125179141
20136225239
20143215458
20154295080
201632710108
20173189077
20181—082
20194107066
2020453072
20211—0100
20227860111
20235155092
20243167075
202532641106
20262—0—

What is it indicated for?

The Leos system is indicated for intraoperative photocoagulation of the ciliary processes in the treatment of glaucoma, proliferative retinopathies, retinal detachment, and for evaluation of the internal ocular structures in patients with dense opacifications of the anterior segment which do not allow a posterior view. Glaucoma - This instrument is indicated for the treatment of glaucoma in patients who have failed with conventional topical and systemic…

Read the full statement (145 words)

The Leos system is indicated for intraoperative photocoagulation of the ciliary processes in the treatment of glaucoma, proliferative retinopathies, retinal detachment, and for evaluation of the internal ocular structures in patients with dense opacifications of the anterior segment which do not allow a posterior view.

Glaucoma - This instrument is indicated for the treatment of glaucoma in patients who have failed with conventional topical and systemic medications, or previous laser photocoagulation, or trabeculectomy and other filtering procedures, or cyclocryotherapy or other cyclodestructive procedures.

Vitreoretinal Surgery - The endoscopically controlled endophotocoagulation that is possible with the ophthalmic laser endoscope is also useful for endophotocoagulation:

- During vitreous surgery to produce chorioretinal scar around retinal breaks or retinotomy sites.

- To perform intraoperative panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) in proliferative retinopathies.

- To perform intraoperative retinal photocoagulation on a scleral buckle.

- To perform intraoperative photocoagulation around focal neovascularization.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K240615: Leos Laser and Endoscopy System.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K240615

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026