510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Silverlon® Wound Contact, Burn Contact Dressing

K241225510(k) TraditionalCleared Jul 31, 202490-day reviewClass U

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Argentum Medical, LLC · FRO Dressing, Wound, Drug

Cleared on Jul 31, 2024 as substantially equivalent to K221218 (Argentum Medical, Inc., 2022) after a 90-day review. Its family tree reaches back 8 generations to 1992.

Decided
Jul 31, 2024
Review
90 days
Class
Class U
Product code
FRO
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 8 generations to K914579 (1992). 28 ancestors in all, the oldest K890354 (1989). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

  1. Root · 8 generations backK914579 Silver Foam Wound DressingVitaphore Corp. · 1992
  2. 7 generations backK955453 Acticoat Silver Coated DressingWestaim Technologies, Inc. · 1996
  3. 6 generations backK981299 Silverlon Contact Wound DressingArgentum International, LLC · 1998
  4. 5 generations backK023612 Silverlon Contact Wound DressingArgentum International, LLC · 2003
  5. 4 generations backK073213 Therabond Antimicrobial Barrier SystemsChoice Therapeutics · 2008
  6. 3 generations backK150256 Silverlon Burn Contact DressingsArgentum Medical · 2015
  7. 2 generations backK190343 Silverlon Wound Contact, Burn Contact DressingsArgentum Medical, LLC · 2019
  8. 1 generation backK221218 Silverlon Wound Contact, Burn Contact DressingsArgentum Medical, Inc. · 2022
  9. This deviceK241225 Silverlon® Wound Contact, Burn Contact DressingArgentum Medical, LLC · 2024
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−8K914579Silver Foam Wound DressingVitaphore Corp.1992—
−7K955453Acticoat Silver Coated DressingWestaim Technologies, Inc.1996—
−6K981299Silverlon Contact Wound DressingArgentum International, LLC1998—
−5K023612Silverlon Contact Wound DressingArgentum International, LLC2003—
−4K073213Therabond Antimicrobial Barrier SystemsChoice Therapeutics2008—
−3K150256Silverlon Burn Contact DressingsArgentum Medical2015—
−2K190343Silverlon Wound Contact, Burn Contact DressingsArgentum Medical, LLC2019—
−1K221218Silverlon Wound Contact, Burn Contact DressingsArgentum Medical, Inc.2022—
0 (this device)K241225Silverlon® Wound Contact, Burn Contact DressingArgentum Medical, LLC2024—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
198920
199110
199210
199310
199410
199720
199820
199930
200010
200210
200720
200810
200910
201410
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K241225, 1992–2024Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in FRO? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new FRO device

  1. #1 K261023 Microdacyn Wound Irrigation Solutionscore 15.5 · 14 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K221218Silverlon Wound Contact, Burn Contact Dressings
Summary page 5
…de: FRO Panel: General & Plastic Surgery III. PREDICATE DEVICE Silverlon® Wound Contact, Burn Contact Dressings, K221218 This predicate has not been subject to a design-related recall. No reference devices were used in this submission.…
Argentum Medical, Inc.2022—

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 32 years and passes through 7 companies; a new generation was cleared every 4.3 years on median.
  • None of the 28 ancestors has a recall.

How does its category compare?

All FRO devices

FRO Dressing, Wound, Drug: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2024, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · FRO

11in 2025

2007: 292008: 262009: 312010: 312011: 272012: 242013: 192014: 222015: 282016: 282017: 232018: 202019: 162020: 122021: 82022: 92023: 182024: 242025: 112026 (partial year): 17
2007high 31 (2009) · low 8 (2021)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · FRO

176in 2025

2007: 187 days median2008: 130 days median2009: 136 days median2010: 146 days median2011: 177 days median2012: 96 days median2013: 194 days median2014: 214 days median2015: 249 days median2016: 222 days median2017: 147 days median2018: 206 days median2019: 270 days median2020: 226 days median2021: 275 days median2022: 332 days median2023: 283 days median2024: 263 days median2025: 176 days median2026 (partial year): 254 days median
2007high 332 (2022) · low 96 (2012)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · FRO

2in 2024

2007: 42008: 12009: 12011: 42013: 12014: 12015: 22016: 32017: 12019: 12021: 62022: 22023: 2, 2 Class I2024: 22026 (partial year): 2
2007high 6 (2021) · low 0 (2010)2026

Class I (2 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · FRO

192in 2025

2007: 552008: 302009: 452010: 1222011: 422012: 652013: 1392014: 2692015: 2972016: 1472017: 1492018: 1282019: 1362020: 1392021: 1832022: 1762023: 1982024: 2322025: 192
2007high 297 (2015) · low 30 (2008)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code FRO, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
200729187455
200826130130
200931136145
2010311460122
201127177442
20122496065
2013191941139
2014222141269
2015282492297
2016282223147
2017231471149
2018202060128
2019162701136
2020122260139
202182756183
202293322176
2023182832 (2)198
2024242632232
2025111760192
2026172542—

What is it indicated for?

Local management of superficial wounds, minor burns, abrasions and lacerations. Silverlon® Wound Contact, Burn Contact Dressings are indicated for use up to 7 days for partial and full thickness wounds including traumatic wounds, surgical wounds (donor and graft sites, incisions), first and second-degree thermal burns, as well as dermal ulcers (stage I-IV pressure sores, venous stasis ulcers, arterial ulcers, diabetic ulcers), vascular access or…

Read the full statement (259 words)

Local management of superficial wounds, minor burns, abrasions and lacerations.

Silverlon® Wound Contact, Burn Contact Dressings are indicated for use up to 7 days for partial and full thickness wounds including traumatic wounds, surgical wounds (donor and graft sites, incisions), first and second-degree thermal burns, as well as dermal ulcers (stage I-IV pressure sores, venous stasis ulcers, arterial ulcers, diabetic ulcers), vascular access or peripheral IV sites, orthopedic external pin sites, and wound drain sites.

Silverlon® Wound Contact, Burn Contact Dressings are indicated for use up to 7 days for decontaminated stable unroofed first- and second-degree mustard-induced vesicant injuries not requiring skin grafting.

Silverlon® Wound Contact, Burn Contact Dressings are indicated for use up to 7 days for radiation dermatitis.

Silverlon® Wound Contact, Burn Contact Dressings are indicated for use up to 7 days for acute cutaneous radiation injury including moist desquamation without full thickness skin ulceration and/or necrosis.

Silverlon® Wound Contact, Burn Contact Dressings are indicated for the management of infected wounds, as the silver in the dressing provides an antimicrobial barrier that may be helpful in managing these wounds. In addition, the moist wound healing environment and control of wound bacteria within the Silverlon® Wound Contact, Burn Contact Dressings may help reduce the risk of wound infection and support the body's healing process.

Silverlon® Wound Contact, Burn Contact Dressings may be used for the management of painful wounds. Silverlon® Wound Contact, Wound Burn Dressings are a non-adherent wound contact layer that reduces pain during dressing changes and evaporation of moisture in the dressing may soothe the wound.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K241225: Silverlon® Wound Contact, Burn Contact Dressing.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K241225

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026