510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

vRad Viewer

K241879510(k) SpecialCleared Jul 18, 202420-day reviewClass II21 CFR 892.2050

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Virtual Radiologic Corporation · LLZ System, Image Processing, Radiological

Cleared on Jul 18, 2024 as substantially equivalent to K162145 (Virtual Radiologic Corporation, 2016) after a 20-day review. Its family tree reaches back 3 generations to 2005.

Decided
Jul 18, 2024
Review
20 days
Class
Class II
Product code
LLZ
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 3 generations to K051553 (2005). 4 ancestors in all. No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

  1. Root · 3 generations backK051553 Fuji Synapse Workstation SoftwareFujifilm Medical Systems U.S.A, Inc. · 2005 · Recalled
  2. 2 generations backK112439 Synapse Workstation Software Version 3.3.0Fujifilm Medical System U.S.A., Inc. · 2011 · Recalled
  3. 1 generation backK162145 vRad PACS with MammographyVirtual Radiologic Corporation · 2016 · Recalled
  4. This deviceK241879 vRad ViewerVirtual Radiologic Corporation · 2024
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−3K051553Fuji Synapse Workstation SoftwareFujifilm Medical Systems U.S.A, Inc.20051
−2K112439Synapse Workstation Software Version 3.3.0Fujifilm Medical System U.S.A., Inc.20112
−1K162145vRad PACS with MammographyVirtual Radiologic Corporation20161
0 (this device)K241879vRad ViewerVirtual Radiologic Corporation2024—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200610
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K241879, 2005–2024Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in LLZ? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new LLZ device

  1. #1 K230955 syngo Application Softwarescore 21.5 · 11 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K162145vRad PACS with Mammography
Summary page 5
…K241879 Predicate Device(s): vRad PACS with Mammography (K162145) Device Description: The vRad Viewer is a Software as a Medical Device (SaMD) that imports medical data in the Digital Imaging…
Virtual Radiologic Corporation20161

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 19 years and passes through 3 companies; a new generation was cleared every 6.3 years on median.
  • 4 of the 4 ancestors have a recall of any class.

How does its category compare?

All LLZ devices

LLZ System, Image Processing, Radiological: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2024, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · LLZ

58in 2025

2007: 762008: 942009: 702010: 512011: 1062012: 822013: 952014: 782015: 642016: 822017: 782018: 1042019: 742020: 812021: 832022: 652023: 872024: 622025: 582026 (partial year): 45
2007high 106 (2011) · low 51 (2010)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · LLZ

173in 2025

2007: 36 days median2008: 52 days median2009: 62 days median2010: 98 days median2011: 79 days median2012: 87 days median2013: 84 days median2014: 89 days median2015: 90 days median2016: 90 days median2017: 107 days median2018: 105 days median2019: 107 days median2020: 115 days median2021: 116 days median2022: 137 days median2023: 157 days median2024: 131 days median2025: 173 days median2026 (partial year): 110 days median
2007high 173 (2025) · low 36 (2007)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · LLZ

11in 2025

2007: 202008: 322009: 212010: 172011: 302012: 122013: 642014: 62015: 162016: 122017: 52018: 72019: 22020: 62021: 32022: 42023: 82024: 62025: 112026 (partial year): 14
2007high 64 (2013) · low 2 (2019)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · LLZ

116in 2025

2007: 1522008: 1542009: 1452010: 1452011: 4542012: 2662013: 1,1302014: 15,6312015: 2112016: 2902017: 1042018: 722019: 882020: 822021: 702022: 282023: 262024: 422025: 116
2007high 15,631 (2014) · low 26 (2023)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code LLZ, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
2007763620152
2008945232154
2009706221145
2010519817145
20111067930454
2012828712266
20139584641,130
20147889615,631
2015649016211
2016829012290
2017781075104
2018104105772
201974107288
202081115682
202183116370
202265137428
202387157826
202462131642
20255817311116
20264511014—

What is it indicated for?

The vRad Viewer software is used with general purpose computing hardware which meets or exceeds minimum specifications. The vRad Viewer is intended to receive, display, and transmit images for clinical purposes. The vRad Viewer is intended for installation on an off-the-shelf PC meeting or exceeding minimum specifications and networked with storage components. The vRad Viewer is intended to serve as the primary user interface for the processing of…

Read the full statement (154 words)

The vRad Viewer software is used with general purpose computing hardware which meets or exceeds minimum specifications. The vRad Viewer is intended to receive, display, and transmit images for clinical purposes. The vRad Viewer is intended for installation on an off-the-shelf PC meeting or exceeding minimum specifications and networked with storage components. The vRad Viewer is intended to serve as the primary user interface for the processing of medical images for presentation on displays appropriate to the medical task being performed. The vRad Viewer can process medical images from DICOM modalities, such as X-ray radiography, X-ray computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, nuclear medicine, and images from other DICOM-compliant modalities.

The vRad Viewer may be used for the display, manipulation, and interpretation of lossless compressed or non-compressed mammography images that have been received in the DICOM "For Presentation" format and may only be used on monitors determined to be appropriate for the desired task.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K241879: vRad Viewer.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K241879

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026