510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

TopCEM-Try in Veneer Try-in Gel

K242572510(k) TraditionalCleared Dec 20, 2024113-day reviewClass II21 CFR 872.3690

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Rizhao Huge Biomaterials Company, Ltd. · EBF Material, Tooth Shade, Resin

Cleared on Dec 20, 2024 as substantially equivalent to K142389 (Ivoclar Vivadent, AG, 2014) after a 113-day review. Its family tree reaches back 2 generations to 1997.

Decided
Dec 20, 2024
Review
113 days
Class
Class II
Product code
EBF
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 2 generations to K971372 (1997). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

  1. Root · 2 generations backK971372 Variolink IIIvoclar North America, Inc. · 1997
  2. 1 generation backK142389 Variolink EstheticIvoclar Vivadent, AG · 2014
  3. This deviceK242572 TopCEM-Try in Veneer Try-in GelRizhao Huge Biomaterials Company, Ltd. · 2024
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−2K971372Variolink IIIvoclar North America, Inc.1997—
−1K142389Variolink EstheticIvoclar Vivadent, AG2014—
0 (this device)K242572TopCEM-Try in Veneer Try-in GelRizhao Huge Biomaterials Company, Ltd.2024—
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K242572, 1997–2024Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in EBF? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new EBF device

  1. #1 K202846 Tera Harzscore 18.5 · 7 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K142389Variolink Esthetic
Summary page 5
…Code Name Number Ivoclar Vivadent Material, Tooth Variolink Esthetic Try-In K142389 EBF 872.3690 Primary AG Shade, Resin…
Ivoclar Vivadent, AG2014—
†K0024523M Rely X Veneer Cement Try-in Paster3M Company2000—

Also cleared against K142389: 2 other devices →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 27 years and passes through 3 companies; a new generation was cleared every 17.5 years on median.
  • None of the 2 ancestors has a recall.
  • 2 other devices also cite its predicate K142389.

How does its category compare?

All EBF devices

EBF Material, Tooth Shade, Resin: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2024, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · EBF

15in 2025

2007: 192008: 142009: 202010: 192011: 192012: 112013: 132014: 102015: 172016: 202017: 152018: 152019: 172020: 152021: 132022: 172023: 92024: 182025: 152026 (partial year): 16
2007high 20 (2009) · low 9 (2023)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · EBF

43in 2025

2007: 49 days median2008: 79 days median2009: 84 days median2010: 75 days median2011: 81 days median2012: 86 days median2013: 153 days median2014: 112 days median2015: 123 days median2016: 205 days median2017: 108 days median2018: 115 days median2019: 159 days median2020: 190 days median2021: 178 days median2022: 63 days median2023: 87 days median2024: 120 days median2025: 43 days median2026 (partial year): 59 days median
2007high 205 (2016) · low 43 (2025)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · EBF

1in 2020

2007: 12008: 422009: 12010: 62011: 72017: 42019: 22020: 12026 (partial year): 2
2007high 42 (2008) · low 0 (2012)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · EBF

1in 2025

2007: 62008: 102009: 82010: 312011: 312012: 622013: 2462014: 1952015: 1192016: 1432017: 422018: 82019: 112020: 22021: 22022: 22023: 82024: 52025: 1
2007high 246 (2013) · low 1 (2025)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code EBF, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
2007194916
200814794210
2009208418
20101975631
20111981731
20121186062
2013131530246
2014101120195
2015171230119
2016202050143
201715108442
20181511508
201917159211
20201519012
20211317802
2022176302
202398708
20241812005
2025154301
202616592—

What is it indicated for?

TopCEM-Try in Veneer Try-in Gel is used to evaluate the shade and the matching of the restoration prior to permanent cementation.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K242572: TopCEM-Try in Veneer Try-in Gel.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 3, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K242572

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026