510(k) · Cleared
ClearedStryker Orthopaedics Hip Devices Labeling Update
Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly
Howmedica Osteonics Corp., Dba Stryker Orthopaedics · LPH Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Polymer, Porous Uncemented
Cleared on Feb 6, 2025 as substantially equivalent to K121308 (Howmedica Osteonics Corp., 2012) and 3 other predicates after a 59-day review. Its family tree reaches back 21 generations to 1994. 2 later devices descend from it.
- Decided
- Feb 6, 2025
- Review
- 59 days
- Class
- Class II
- Product code
- LPH
- Recalls
- None
- Predicates
- 4
Its longest line of descent runs back 21 generations to K941847 (1994). 321 ancestors in all, the oldest K800207 (1980). 2 later devices descend from it, 2 citing it directly.
- Root · 21 generations backK941847 5/8 Porocoat Aml Hip Porocoat Porous CoatingDepuy, Inc. · 1994
- 17 generations between
- 3 generations backK211703 Insignia Hip StemStryker Orthopaedics · 2021
- 2 generations backK220731 Insignia Hip Stem, Restoration Modular 115mm Conical Distal StemStryker · 2022
- 1 generation backK233498 Stryker Orthopaedics Hip Systems Labeling UpdateHowmedica Osteonics Corp., Dba Stryker Orthopaedics · 2023
- This deviceK243784 Stryker Orthopaedics Hip Devices Labeling UpdateHowmedica Osteonics Corp., Dba Stryker Orthopaedics · 2025
- Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK261624 Omnifit® 20° Series I Insert;Omnifit® Crossfire® 10° Series II…Howmedica Osteonics Corp., Dba Stryker Orthopaedics · 2026 · Recalled
- Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK250989 Stryker and Serf hip devicesHowmedica Osteonics Corp (Dba Stryker Orthopaedics) · 2025
Show all 21 generations
- Root · 21 generations backK941847 5/8 Porocoat Aml Hip Porocoat Porous CoatingDepuy, Inc. · 1994
- 20 generations backK964650 TCP-Coated Porocoat Aml Femoral Hip ProsthesisDepuy, Inc. · 1997
- 19 generations backK980711 Harris/Galante Porous (HGP) Hip Prosthesis with Calcicoat Ceramic…Zimmer, Inc. · 1998 · Recalled
- 18 generations backK001277 Triflange Acetabular Cup SystemDePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · 2000
- 17 generations backK031495 Pinnacle Duofix HA Acetabular Cup ProsthesisDePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · 2003
- 16 generations backK042344 Excia Total Hip SystemAesculap, Inc. · 2005 · Recalled
- 15 generations backK060918 Excia Total Hip System 12/14 Trunnion with Ceramic HeadAesculap, Inc. · 2006
- 14 generations backK062684 Excia Total Hip System 36MM Ceramic HeadAesculap, Inc. · 2006
- 13 generations backK082991 Biolox Delta Ceramic Femoral HeadAesculap Implant Systems, Inc. · 2008
- 12 generations backK083495 Modification to: Metha Hip SystemAesculap Implant Systems, Inc. · 2009
- 11 generations backK090845 Apex Arc Hip StemOmni Life Science, Inc. · 2010 · Recalled
- 10 generations backK111193 Apex Arc Hip StemOmni Life Science, Inc. · 2011
- 9 generations backK113242 Apex Arc Hip StemOmni Life Science, Inc. · 2012
- 8 generations backK123991 Depuy Corail Amt Hip ProsthesisDepuy France S.A.S. · 2013 · Recalled
- 7 generations backK150862 DePuy Actis Duofox Hip ProsthesisDePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · 2015 · Recalled
- 6 generations backK170339 Summit Hip SystemDePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · 2018
- 5 generations backK193398 Summit DuoFix HA CoatingDePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · 2020
- 4 generations backK202472 ACTIS Duofix Hip ProsthesisDePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · 2020
- 3 generations backK211703 Insignia Hip StemStryker Orthopaedics · 2021
- 2 generations backK220731 Insignia Hip Stem, Restoration Modular 115mm Conical Distal StemStryker · 2022
- 1 generation backK233498 Stryker Orthopaedics Hip Systems Labeling UpdateHowmedica Osteonics Corp., Dba Stryker Orthopaedics · 2023
- This deviceK243784 Stryker Orthopaedics Hip Devices Labeling UpdateHowmedica Osteonics Corp., Dba Stryker Orthopaedics · 2025
Most influential descendants
Showing 2 of 2 · See all- K261624Omnifit® 20° Series I Insert;Omnifit® Crossfire® 10° Series II Insert; Constrained…Howmedica Osteonics Corp., Dba Stryker Orthopaedics · 2026 · cites it directly0descendants
- K250989Stryker and Serf hip devicesHowmedica Osteonics Corp (Dba Stryker Orthopaedics) · 2025 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table
Line of descent and top descendants
| Generation | Number | Device | Applicant | Decided | Recalls |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| −21 | K941847 | 5/8 Porocoat Aml Hip Porocoat Porous Coating | Depuy, Inc. | 1994 | — |
| −20 | K964650 | TCP-Coated Porocoat Aml Femoral Hip Prosthesis | Depuy, Inc. | 1997 | — |
| −19 | K980711 | Harris/Galante Porous (HGP) Hip Prosthesis with Calcicoat Ceramic Coating | Zimmer, Inc. | 1998 | 1 |
| −18 | K001277 | Triflange Acetabular Cup System | DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. | 2000 | — |
| −17 | K031495 | Pinnacle Duofix HA Acetabular Cup Prosthesis | DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. | 2003 | — |
| −16 | K042344 | Excia Total Hip System | Aesculap, Inc. | 2005 | 10 |
| −15 | K060918 | Excia Total Hip System 12/14 Trunnion with Ceramic Head | Aesculap, Inc. | 2006 | — |
| −14 | K062684 | Excia Total Hip System 36MM Ceramic Head | Aesculap, Inc. | 2006 | — |
| −13 | K082991 | Biolox Delta Ceramic Femoral Head | Aesculap Implant Systems, Inc. | 2008 | — |
| −12 | K083495 | Modification to: Metha Hip System | Aesculap Implant Systems, Inc. | 2009 | — |
| −11 | K090845 | Apex Arc Hip Stem | Omni Life Science, Inc. | 2010 | 2 |
| −10 | K111193 | Apex Arc Hip Stem | Omni Life Science, Inc. | 2011 | — |
| −9 | K113242 | Apex Arc Hip Stem | Omni Life Science, Inc. | 2012 | — |
| −8 | K123991 | Depuy Corail Amt Hip Prosthesis | Depuy France S.A.S. | 2013 | 1 |
| −7 | K150862 | DePuy Actis Duofox Hip Prosthesis | DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. | 2015 | 1 |
| −6 | K170339 | Summit Hip System | DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. | 2018 | — |
| −5 | K193398 | Summit DuoFix HA Coating | DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. | 2020 | — |
| −4 | K202472 | ACTIS Duofix Hip Prosthesis | DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. | 2020 | — |
| −3 | K211703 | Insignia Hip Stem | Stryker Orthopaedics | 2021 | — |
| −2 | K220731 | Insignia Hip Stem, Restoration Modular 115mm Conical Distal Stem | Stryker | 2022 | — |
| −1 | K233498 | Stryker Orthopaedics Hip Systems Labeling Update | Howmedica Osteonics Corp., Dba Stryker Orthopaedics | 2023 | — |
| 0 (this device) | K243784 | Stryker Orthopaedics Hip Devices Labeling Update | Howmedica Osteonics Corp., Dba Stryker Orthopaedics | 2025 | — |
| +1 | K261624 | Omnifit® 20° Series I Insert;Omnifit® Crossfire® 10° Series II Insert… | Howmedica Osteonics Corp., Dba Stryker Orthopaedics | 2026 | 2 |
| +1 | K250989 | Stryker and Serf hip devices | Howmedica Osteonics Corp (Dba Stryker Orthopaedics) | 2025 | — |
Other ancestors by year cleared
| Year cleared | Devices | With a Class I recall |
|---|---|---|
| 1980 | 1 | 0 |
| 1981 | 1 | 0 |
| 1984 | 1 | 0 |
| 1985 | 3 | 0 |
| 1987 | 3 | 0 |
| 1988 | 1 | 0 |
| 1989 | 2 | 0 |
| 1990 | 6 | 0 |
| 1991 | 7 | 0 |
| 1992 | 7 | 0 |
| 1993 | 5 | 0 |
| 1994 | 27 | 0 |
| 1995 | 19 | 0 |
| 1996 | 20 | 0 |
| 1997 | 14 | 0 |
| 1998 | 16 | 0 |
| 1999 | 8 | 0 |
| 2000 | 24 | 0 |
| 2001 | 14 | 0 |
| 2002 | 22 | 0 |
| 2003 | 13 | 0 |
| 2004 | 10 | 0 |
| 2005 | 13 | 0 |
| 2006 | 8 | 0 |
| 2007 | 6 | 0 |
| 2008 | 4 | 0 |
| 2009 | 4 | 0 |
| 2010 | 3 | 0 |
| 2011 | 10 | 0 |
| 2012 | 3 | 0 |
| 2013 | 3 | 0 |
| 2014 | 2 | 0 |
| 2015 | 2 | 0 |
| 2016 | 3 | 0 |
| 2017 | 1 | 0 |
| 2018 | 1 | 0 |
| 2019 | 3 | 0 |
| 2020 | 2 | 0 |
| 2021 | 2 | 0 |
| 2022 | 5 | 0 |
Descendants by year cleared
| Year cleared | Devices | With a Class I recall |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1 | 0 |
| 2026 | 1 | 0 |
Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.
Planning a device in LPH? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.
Top candidate predicates for a new LPH device
- #1 K233498 Stryker Orthopaedics Hip Systems Labeling Updatescore 24.2 · 20 generations · no Class I recall
- #2 Held for the reportin the report
- #3 Held for the reportin the report
What was it cleared against? (4)
Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.
| Type | Number | Device | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|
| * | K121308 | Hip SystemsSummary page 8…4 Product Codes: LPH, LZO, JDI, MEH, KWZ, KWL, JDG, LZN, LWJ, KWY, MAY, MBL Primary Predicate Device to Which Substantial Equivalence is Claimed: Submission Number: K121308 Device Name: Hip Systems Product Codes: LPH, JDI, KWY, KWZ, LWJ, LZO, MAY, MBL, MEH Additional Predicate Device Used to Support… | 2012 |
| * | K233498 | Stryker Orthopaedics Hip Systems Labeling UpdateSummary page 8…umber: K121308 Device Name: Hip Systems Product Codes: LPH, JDI, KWY, KWZ, LWJ, LZO, MAY, MBL, MEH Additional Predicate Device Used to Support Substantial Equivalence: K233498: Stryker Orthopaedics Hip Systems Labeling Update K974685: OSTEONICS POLYETHYLENE ACETABULAR COMPONENTS K900438: MC2P ACETABULAR… | 2023 |
| * | K974685 | Osteonics Polyethylene Acetabular ComponentsSummary page 8…, JDI, KWY, KWZ, LWJ, LZO, MAY, MBL, MEH Additional Predicate Device Used to Support Substantial Equivalence: K233498: Stryker Orthopaedics Hip Systems Labeling Update K974685: OSTEONICS POLYETHYLENE ACETABULAR COMPONENTS K900438: MC2P ACETABULAR COMPONENT Reason for 510(k) Submission: The purpose of… | 1998 |
| * | K900438 | MC2P Acetabular ComponentSummary page 8…redicate Device Used to Support Substantial Equivalence: K233498: Stryker Orthopaedics Hip Systems Labeling Update K974685: OSTEONICS POLYETHYLENE ACETABULAR COMPONENTS K900438: MC2P ACETABULAR COMPONENT Reason for 510(k) Submission: The purpose of this “Change Being Effected” submission is to add a co… | 1990 |
What descends from it? (2)
2 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.
Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)
No FDA recall names this device.
No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.
What does this lineage say?
- The line of descent spans 31 years and passes through 10 companies; a new generation was cleared every 1.4 years on median.
- 87 of the 320 ancestors have a recall of any class.
- Of its descendants, K261624 (Howmedica Osteonics Corp., Dba Stryker Orthopaedics, 2026) has gone furthest, with 0 descendants of its own.
- 7 other devices also cite its predicate K121308.
How does its category compare?
All LPH devicesLPH Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Polymer, Porous Uncemented: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2025, this device’s year, is highlighted.
FDA decisions per year · LPH
12in 2025
2026 to Oct 25, outlined.
Median 510(k) review, days · LPH
153in 2025
Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.
Recalls per year · LPH
4in 2025
Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified
Adverse event reports per year · LPH
6,163in 2025
MAUDE reports naming product code LPH, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.
View these four charts as a table
| Year | Decisions | Median 510(k) review, days | Recalls (Class I) | MAUDE reports |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 10 | 116 | 16 | 509 |
| 2008 | 10 | 86 | 1 | 706 |
| 2009 | 3 | 112 | 2 | 1,156 |
| 2010 | 15 | 100 | 22 | 2,007 |
| 2011 | 16 | 110 | 26 | 3,320 |
| 2012 | 25 | 76 | 30 | 3,785 |
| 2013 | 11 | 135 | 9 | 5,002 |
| 2014 | 20 | 129 | 3 | 5,163 |
| 2015 | 18 | 111 | 1 | 5,830 |
| 2016 | 10 | 150 | 8 | 4,900 |
| 2017 | 12 | 121 | 14 | 5,312 |
| 2018 | 9 | 145 | 2 | 5,954 |
| 2019 | 22 | 164 | 8 | 7,130 |
| 2020 | 7 | 164 | 6 | 5,429 |
| 2021 | 8 | 410 | 4 | 5,978 |
| 2022 | 14 | 247 | 2 | 5,223 |
| 2023 | 10 | 111 | 2 | 5,345 |
| 2024 | 6 | 92 | 1 | 5,626 |
| 2025 | 12 | 153 | 4 | 6,163 |
| 2026 | 8 | 256 | 2 | — |
What is it indicated for?
Indications for Restoration Modular Hip System • Noninflammatory degenerative joint disease, including osteoarthritis and avascular necrosis; • Rheumatoid arthritis; • Correction of functional deformity; • Revision procedures where other treatments or devices have failed; and, • Nonunions, femoral neck fractures, and trochanteric fractures of the proximal femur with head involvement that are unmanageable using other techniques. • The RESTORATION Modular…
Read the full statement (920 words)
Indications for Restoration Modular Hip System
• Noninflammatory degenerative joint disease, including osteoarthritis and avascular necrosis;
• Rheumatoid arthritis;
• Correction of functional deformity;
• Revision procedures where other treatments or devices have failed; and,
• Nonunions, femoral neck fractures, and trochanteric fractures of the proximal femur with head involvement that are unmanageable using other techniques.
• The RESTORATION Modular Hip System is intended for primary and revision total hip arthroplasty as well as in the presence of severe proximal bone loss. These femoral stems are designed to be press fit into the proximal femur.
Indications for Accolade C, Accolade HFx, SYSTEM 12 CROSSFIRE, ACCOLADE DISTAL SPACER, CITATION TMZF, PCA Duration Insert, PCA Femoral Head
• Noninflammatory degenerative joint disease, including osteoarthritis and avascular necrosis;
• Rheumatoid arthritis;
• Correction of functional deformity;
• Revision procedures where other treatments or devices have failed; and,
• Nonunions, femoral neck fractures, and trochanteric fractures of the proximal femur with head involvement that are unmanageable using other techniques
Indications for Accolade II Stems
The indications for use of the total hip replacement prostheses include:
• noninflammatory degenerative joint disease, including osteoarthritis and avascular necrosis;
• rheumatoid arthritis;
• correction of functional deformity;
• revision procedures where other treatments or devices have failed; and,
• nonunions, femoral neck and trochanteric fractures of the proximal femur with head involvement that are unmanageable using other techniques.
Additional indication specific to use of ACCOLADE II Femoral Stems with compatible Howmedica Osteonics Constrained Liners
• When the stem is to be used with compatible Howmedica Osteonics Constrained Liners, the device is intended for use in primary or revision patients at high risk of hip dislocation due to a history of prior dislocation, bone loss, soft tissue laxity, neuromuscular disease, or intraoperative instability.
ACCOLADE II Femoral Stems are intended for cementless use only and are intended for total and hemiarthroplasty procedures.
Indications for OMNIFIT SERIES Acetbular Inserts, Omnifit Crossfire10 Deg Inserts, Crossfire Eccentric Inserts, Omnifit Crossfire Inserts, Trident Crossfire Inserts, Trident X3 Inserts, Trident X3 Eccentric Inserts
• Painful, disabling joint disease of the hip resulting from: degenerative arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, posttraumatic arthritis or late stage avascular necrosis.
• Revision of previous unsuccessful femoral head replacement, cup arthroplasty or other procedure.
• Clinical management problems where arthrodesis or alternative reconstructive techniques are less likely to achieve satisfactory results.
• Where bone stock is of poor quality or inadequate for other reconstructive techniques as indicated by deficiencies of the acetabulum.
Indications for ALL POLY CONSTRAINED INSERT, TRIDENT 0 DEG CONSTRAINED INSERT, TRIDENT CONSTRAINED INSERT
A Constrained Acetabular Insert is indicated for use as a component of a total hip prosthesis in primary and revision patients at high risk of hip dislocation due to a history of prior dislocation, bone loss, joint or soft tissue laxity, neuromuscular disease, or intraoperative instability.
Indications for UHR Bipolar
• Femoral head/neck fractures or non-unions.
• Aseptic necrosis of the femoral head.
• Osteo-, rheumatoid, and post-traumatic arthritis of the hip with minimal acetabular involvement or distortion.
Other Considerations:
• Pathological conditions or age considerations which indicate a more conservative acetabular procedure and an avoidance of the use of bone cement in the acetabulum.
• Salvage of failed total hip arthroplasty
Indications for Artisan Bone Plug
These bone plugs are intended to be placed in the femoral canal prior to the introduction of bone cement in a cemented hip procedure.
The plug is placed distally to the femoral stem to help allow cement pressurization and to help prevent cement migration further down the femoral canal.
Indications for C-Taper Alumina Ceramic Heads, V40 Taper Alumina Ceramic Heads,Ceramic V40™ Femoral Head
• Painful, disabling joint disease of the hip resulting from: degenerative arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, posttraumatic arthritis or late stage avascular necrosis.
• Revision of previous unsuccessful femoral head replacement, cup arthroplasty or other procedure.
• Clinical management problems where arthrodesis or alternative reconstructive techniques are less likely to achieve satisfactory results.
• Where bone stock is of poor quality or is inadequate for other reconstructive techniques as indicated by deficiencies of the acetabulum
Indications for BIOLOX Delta Ceramic Heads, C-Taper to Universal Taper Adapter Sleeve, Universal V40™ Taper Adapter Sleeve
For Use as a Total Hip Replacement:
• Painful disabling joint disease of the hip resulting from: degenerative arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, post-traumatic arthritis or late stage avascular necrosis.
• Revision of previous cup arthroplasty or other procedures
• Clinical management problems where arthrodesis or alternative reconstructive techniques are less likely to achieve satisfactory results.
• Where bone stock is of poor quality or is inadequate for other reconstructive techniques as indicated by deficiencies in the acetabulum.
For Use as a Bipolar Hip Replacement
• Femoral head/neck fractures or non-unions.
• Aseptic necrosis of the femoral head.
• Osteo-, rheumatoid, and post traumatic arthritis of the hip with minimal acetabular involvement or distortion.
• Pathological considerations or age considerations which indicate a more conservative acetabular procedure and an avoidance of the use of bone cement in the acetabulum.
• Salvage of failed total hip arthroplasty
Indications for ADM/MDM X3 Inserts, MDM Acetabular Inserts, MDM Acetabular Liners
The indications for use for total hip arthroplasty include:
1. Noninflammatory degenerative joint disease including osteoarthritis and avascular necrosis;
2. Rheumatoid arthritis;
3. Correction of functional deformity;
4. Revision procedures where other treatments or devices have failed; and,
5. Treatment of nonunion, femoral neck and trochanteric fractures of the proximal femur with head involvement that are unmanageable using other techniques.
6. Dislocation risks
MDM Liners are intended for cementless use only.
Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.
https://510kreport.com/device/K243784 · printed Nov 6, 2026
Cite this page
510(k) Report. “K243784: Stryker Orthopaedics Hip Devices Labeling Update.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K243784
Report an extraction error
Are you the manufacturer?
Record history
- FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
- Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
- Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
- Page last updated Nov 3, 2026