510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Rotium

K250021510(k) TraditionalCleared Feb 27, 202555-day reviewClass II21 CFR 878.3300

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Nanofiber Solutions, LLC · OWW Mesh, Surgical, Absorbable, Orthopaedics, Reinforcement Of Tendon

Cleared on Feb 27, 2025 as substantially equivalent to K201572 (Embody, Inc., 2020) after a 55-day review. Its family tree reaches back 6 generations to 1985.

Decided
Feb 27, 2025
Review
55 days
Class
Class II
Product code
OWW
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 6 generations to K850785 (1985). 11 ancestors in all. No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

  1. Root · 6 generations backK850785 Fastube Nerve Regeneration DeviceResearch Medical, Inc. · 1985
  2. 5 generations backK012814 Collagen Nerve CuffCollagen Matrix, Inc. · 2001
  3. 4 generations backK060952 Collagen Nerve WrapCollagen Matrix, Inc. · 2006
  4. 3 generations backK080452 Collagen Tendon WrapCollagen Matrix, Inc. · 2008
  5. 2 generations backK112423 Collagen Tendon SheetRotation Medical, Inc. · 2011
  6. 1 generation backK201572 TAPESTRY Biointegrative ImplantEmbody, Inc. · 2020
  7. This deviceK250021 RotiumNanofiber Solutions, LLC · 2025
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−6K850785Fastube Nerve Regeneration DeviceResearch Medical, Inc.1985—
−5K012814Collagen Nerve CuffCollagen Matrix, Inc.2001—
−4K060952Collagen Nerve WrapCollagen Matrix, Inc.2006—
−3K080452Collagen Tendon WrapCollagen Matrix, Inc.2008—
−2K112423Collagen Tendon SheetRotation Medical, Inc.2011—
−1K201572TAPESTRY Biointegrative ImplantEmbody, Inc.2020—
0 (this device)K250021RotiumNanofiber Solutions, LLC2025—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200020
200110
200410
200610
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K250021, 1985–2025Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in OWW? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new OWW device

  1. #1 K241906 BioBrace® Reinforced Implantscore 17.1 · 12 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K201572TAPESTRY Biointegrative Implant
Summary page 5
…cation Name: Surgical Mesh (21 CFR 878.3300) Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: OWW Predicate Device(s): TAPESTRY Biointegrative Implant (K201572) Reference Device(s): Rotium Bioresorbable Wick (K183236, K201414, K231641) Reason for Submission: New Device Indi…
Embody, Inc.2020—
†K183236Rotium Bioresorbable WickNanofiber Solutions, LLC2019—
†K201414Rotium Bioresorbable WickNanofiber Solutions, LLC2020—
†K231641Rotium Bioresorbable WickNanofiber Solutions, LLC2023—

Also cleared against K201572: 2 other devices →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 40 years and passes through 5 companies; a new generation was cleared every 4.8 years on median.
  • 2 of the 11 ancestors have a recall of any class.
  • 2 other devices also cite its predicate K201572.

How does its category compare?

All OWW devices

OWW Mesh, Surgical, Absorbable, Orthopaedics, Reinforcement Of Tendon: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2025, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · OWW

2in 2025

2012: 12016: 12021: 12023: 22024: 32025: 2
2007high 3 (2024) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · OWW

81in 2024

2024: 81 days median
2007high 81 (2024)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · OWW

No recall names OWW since 2007.

Adverse event reports per year · OWW

2in 2025

2025: 2
2007high 2 (2025) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code OWW, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—00
20080—00
20090—00
20100—00
20110—00
20121—00
20130—00
20140—00
20150—00
20161—00
20170—00
20180—00
20190—00
20200—00
20211—00
20220—00
20232—00
202438100
20252—02
20260—0—

What is it indicated for?

Rotium® is indicated for the management and protection of tendon injuries in which there has been no substantial loss of tendon tissue.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K250021: Rotium.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K250021

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026