510(k) · Cleared
ClearedChoice 2 DC
Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly
Bisco, Inc. · EMA Cement, Dental
Cleared on Jul 11, 2025 as substantially equivalent to K101787 (Bisco, Inc., 2010) after a 171-day review. Its family tree reaches back 4 generations to 2000.
- Decided
- Jul 11, 2025
- Review
- 171 days
- Class
- Class II
- Product code
- EMA
- Recalls
- None
- Predicates
- 1
Its longest line of descent runs back 4 generations to K002364 (2000). 8 ancestors in all, the oldest K934596 (1994). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.
- Root · 4 generations backK002364 Protemp HEspe Dental AG · 2000
- 3 generations backK062292 Unicem3M Espe Dental Products · 2006
- 2 generations backK093338 Self Adhesive Composite Luting CementDmg USA, Inc. · 2010
- 1 generation backK101787 Duolink IIBisco, Inc. · 2010
- This deviceK250156 Choice 2 DCBisco, Inc. · 2025
View FIG. 1 as a table
Line of descent and top descendants
| Generation | Number | Device | Applicant | Decided | Recalls |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| −4 | K002364 | Protemp H | Espe Dental AG | 2000 | — |
| −3 | K062292 | Unicem | 3M Espe Dental Products | 2006 | — |
| −2 | K093338 | Self Adhesive Composite Luting Cement | Dmg USA, Inc. | 2010 | — |
| −1 | K101787 | Duolink II | Bisco, Inc. | 2010 | — |
| 0 (this device) | K250156 | Choice 2 DC | Bisco, Inc. | 2025 | — |
Other ancestors by year cleared
| Year cleared | Devices | With a Class I recall |
|---|---|---|
| 1994 | 2 | 0 |
| 2004 | 2 | 0 |
Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.
Planning a device in EMA? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.
Top candidate predicates for a new EMA device
- #1 K254109 G-Cem Universalscore 15.0 · 13 generations · no Class I recall
- #2 Held for the reportin the report
- #3 Held for the reportin the report
What was it cleared against? (1)
Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.
| Type | Number | Device | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|
| * | K101787 | Duolink IISummary page 5…872.3275 Product Code(s) EMA | Legally Marketed Predicate Devices 21 CFR 807.92(a)(3) Predicate # Predicate Trade Name (Primary Predicate is listed first) Product Code K101787 Duo-Link Universal (cleared as DUOLINK II) EMA Device Description Summary 21 CFR 807.92(a)(4) Choice 2 DC is a color stable dual… | 2010 |
| † | K142389 | Variolink Esthetic | 2014 |
What descends from it?
No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.
Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)
No FDA recall names this device.
No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.
What does this lineage say?
- The line of descent spans 25 years and passes through 4 companies; a new generation was cleared every 6.2 years on median.
- None of the 8 ancestors has a recall.
How does its category compare?
All EMA devicesEMA Cement, Dental: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2025, this device’s year, is highlighted.
FDA decisions per year · EMA
10in 2025
2026 to Oct 25, outlined.
Median 510(k) review, days · EMA
106in 2025
Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.
Recalls per year · EMA
1in 2023
Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified
Adverse event reports per year · EMA
9in 2025
MAUDE reports naming product code EMA, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.
View these four charts as a table
| Year | Decisions | Median 510(k) review, days | Recalls (Class I) | MAUDE reports |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 6 | 48 | 0 | 33 |
| 2008 | 13 | 71 | 2 | 50 |
| 2009 | 10 | 86 | 1 | 90 |
| 2010 | 14 | 86 | 1 | 106 |
| 2011 | 8 | 79 | 5 | 224 |
| 2012 | 10 | 128 | 0 | 249 |
| 2013 | 12 | 178 | 0 | 385 |
| 2014 | 4 | 174 | 0 | 207 |
| 2015 | 9 | 134 | 0 | 85 |
| 2016 | 10 | 182 | 0 | 16 |
| 2017 | 3 | 141 | 0 | 13 |
| 2018 | 3 | 237 | 0 | 4 |
| 2019 | 7 | 127 | 0 | 12 |
| 2020 | 8 | 164 | 0 | 5 |
| 2021 | 4 | 184 | 0 | 8 |
| 2022 | 7 | 245 | 0 | 3 |
| 2023 | 2 | — | 1 | 6 |
| 2024 | 3 | 59 | 0 | 5 |
| 2025 | 10 | 106 | 0 | 9 |
| 2026 | 7 | 150 | 0 | — |
What is it indicated for?
Choice 2 DC is a dual-cured, resin luting/veneering cement. The indications for use are to cement:
1. Indirect restorations (i.e. crowns, fixed prostheses (bridges), inlay, onlays
2. Endodontic posts
3. Cement-retained implant restorations/abutments (i.e. screws and crowns)
4. Veneers
Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.
https://510kreport.com/device/K250156 · printed Nov 4, 2026
Cite this page
510(k) Report. “K250156: Choice 2 DC.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K250156
Report an extraction error
Are you the manufacturer?
Record history
- FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
- Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
- Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
- Page last updated Nov 3, 2026