510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Midmark Dental Delivery System

K251626510(k) TraditionalCleared Nov 3, 2025159-day reviewClass I21 CFR 872.6640

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Midmark Corporation · EIA Unit, Operative Dental

Cleared on Nov 3, 2025 as substantially equivalent to K120239 (Midmark, 2012) after a 159-day review. Its family tree reaches back 2 generations to 2000.

Decided
Nov 3, 2025
Review
159 days
Class
Class I
Product code
EIA
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 2 generations to K003090 (2000). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

  1. Root · 2 generations backK003090 Midmark Procenter Instrument Delivery SystemMidmark Corp. · 2000
  2. 1 generation backK120239 ElevanceMidmark · 2012
  3. This deviceK251626 Midmark Dental Delivery SystemMidmark Corporation · 2025
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−2K003090Midmark Procenter Instrument Delivery SystemMidmark Corp.2000—
−1K120239ElevanceMidmark2012—
0 (this device)K251626Midmark Dental Delivery SystemMidmark Corporation2025—
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K251626, 2000–2025Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in EIA? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new EIA device

  1. #1 K231845 Dental unit Model: Marescore 14.4 · 6 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K120239Elevance
Summary page 5
…Device Manufacturer Name Trade Name 510(k) No. Decision Date Midmark Corporation Elevance Delivery Unit K120239 August 24, 2012 Midmark Corporation Page 1 of 10 === Page 6…
Midmark2012—

Also cleared against K120239: 1 other device →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 25 years and passes through 3 companies; a new generation was cleared every 13.2 years on median.
  • None of the 2 ancestors has a recall.
  • 1 other device also cites its predicate K120239.

How does its category compare?

All EIA devices

EIA Unit, Operative Dental: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2025, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · EIA

7in 2025

2007: 32008: 62009: 32010: 32011: 52012: 22013: 22014: 22015: 72016: 42017: 12018: 22019: 22020: 12022: 32023: 32024: 32025: 72026 (partial year): 2
2007high 7 (2015) · low 0 (2021)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · EIA

178in 2025

2007: 90 days median2008: 72 days median2009: 109 days median2010: 270 days median2011: 150 days median2015: 214 days median2016: 182 days median2022: 265 days median2023: 686 days median2024: 251 days median2025: 178 days median
2007high 686 (2023) · low 72 (2008)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · EIA

1in 2013

2012: 12013: 1
2007high 1 (2012) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · EIA

47in 2025

2010: 22011: 32012: 72013: 62014: 2552015: 4522016: 1512017: 642018: 732019: 682020: 482021: 492022: 442023: 532024: 532025: 47
2007high 452 (2015) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code EIA, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
200739000
200867200
2009310900
2010327002
2011515003
20122—17
20132—16
20142—0255
201572140452
201641820151
20171—064
20182—073
20192—068
20201—048
20210—049
20223265044
20233686053
20243251053
20257178047
20262—0—

What is it indicated for?

Midmark Dental Delivery Systems are intended to provide dental professionals with low voltage electric, air, and water to operate dental handpieces, syringes, and accessories during dental examinations and procedures.

Midmark Assistant's Delivery Systems are intended to provide dental professionals with air, water, and suction to operate dental handpieces, syringes, and accessories during dental examinations and procedures.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K251626: Midmark Dental Delivery System.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K251626

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026