510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

EMPOWR Knee

K252974510(k) TraditionalCleared Dec 19, 202593-day reviewClass II21 CFR 888.3560

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Encore Medical L.P. · JWH Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer

Cleared on Dec 19, 2025 after a 93-day review. The summary cites 7 numbers, none of which could be confirmed as its predicate (see the table below).

Decided
Dec 19, 2025
Review
93 days
Class
Class II
Product code
JWH
Recalls
None
Predicates
7

The summary cites 7 numbers, none of which could be confirmed as its predicate (see the table below).

FIG. 1 — Lineage of K252974Source: FDA 510(k) database · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in JWH? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new JWH device

  1. #1 K221479 Persona Personalized Knee Systemscore 22.4 · 11 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (7)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary; numbers the summary cites that cannot be its predicate are marked – and kept off the family tree.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
Kept off the family treeK143242FDA’s K143242 is Rebel 3DKNEE System
Not matched in our reading of the summary (scans can blur digits), so it is kept off the family tree
Encore Medical L.P.201517
Kept off the family treeK170573FDA’s K170573 is Empowr CR Knee Tibial Insert
Not matched in our reading of the summary (scans can blur digits), so it is kept off the family tree
Encore Medical L.P.2017—
Kept off the family treeK171991FDA’s K171991 is EMPOWR Porous Knee System
Not matched in our reading of the summary (scans can blur digits), so it is kept off the family tree
Encore Medical L.P.20173
Kept off the family treeK173723FDA’s K173723 is EMPOWR Universal Tibial Baseplate
Not matched in our reading of the summary (scans can blur digits), so it is kept off the family tree
Encore Medical L.P.20181
Kept off the family treeK210308FDA’s K210308 is EMPOWR Porous Femur with HAnano SurfaceTM
Not matched in our reading of the summary (scans can blur digits), so it is kept off the family tree
Encore Medical L.P.2021—
Kept off the family treeK121835FDA’s K121835 is Domed Tri-Peg Patella, Highly Cross Linked Domed Tri-Peg Patella with VE
Not matched in our reading of the summary (scans can blur digits), so it is kept off the family tree
Encore Medical L.P.2012—
Kept off the family treeK212941FDA’s K212941 is Porous Patella
Not matched in our reading of the summary (scans can blur digits), so it is kept off the family tree
Encore Medical, L.P. Dba Djo Surgical20221
†K173890GMK Sphere - Kinematic AlignmentMedacta International S.A.2018—
†K172524Zimmer Persona Personalized Knee SystemZimmer, Inc.2018—

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

How does its category compare?

All JWH devices

JWH Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2025, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · JWH

20in 2025

2007: 182008: 172009: 112010: 192011: 252012: 332013: 312014: 332015: 272016: 182017: 252018: 252019: 282020: 222021: 242022: 172023: 202024: 192025: 202026 (partial year): 12
2007high 33 (2012) · low 11 (2009)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · JWH

55in 2025

2007: 74 days median2008: 81 days median2009: 168 days median2010: 85 days median2011: 87 days median2012: 85 days median2013: 128 days median2014: 98 days median2015: 87 days median2016: 88 days median2017: 118 days median2018: 90 days median2019: 133 days median2020: 59 days median2021: 61 days median2022: 56 days median2023: 57 days median2024: 89 days median2025: 55 days median2026 (partial year): 63 days median
2007high 168 (2009) · low 55 (2025)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · JWH

2in 2025

2007: 142008: 102009: 1092010: 322011: 272012: 852013: 312014: 132015: 112016: 172017: 612018: 142019: 52020: 22021: 82022: 122023: 672024: 72025: 22026 (partial year): 4
2007high 109 (2009) · low 2 (2020)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · JWH

9,306in 2025

2007: 1,3052008: 1,4832009: 1,8702010: 3,2862011: 5,1332012: 5,2032013: 6,1352014: 6,7222015: 6,8812016: 7,5862017: 12,2632018: 14,0712019: 14,9872020: 12,5922021: 9,4082022: 8,3642023: 8,9472024: 10,8282025: 9,306
2007high 14,987 (2019) · low 1,305 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code JWH, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20071874141,305
20081781101,483
2009111681091,870
20101985323,286
20112587275,133
20123385855,203
201331128316,135
20143398136,722
20152787116,881
20161888177,586
2017251186112,263
201825901414,071
201928133514,987
20202259212,592
2021246189,408
20221756128,364
20232057678,947
20241989710,828
2025205529,306
202612634—

What is it indicated for?

When a mechanical alignment approach is utilized, these devices are indicated for patients suffering from disability due to: • degenerative, post-traumatic or rheumatoid arthritis; • avascular necrosis of the femoral condyle; • post-traumatic loss of joint configuration, particularly when there is patellofemoral erosion, dysfunction or prior patellectomy; • moderate valgus, varus or flexion deformities; • treatment of fractures that are unmanageable…

Read the full statement (205 words)

When a mechanical alignment approach is utilized, these devices are indicated for patients suffering from disability due to:

• degenerative, post-traumatic or rheumatoid arthritis;

• avascular necrosis of the femoral condyle;

• post-traumatic loss of joint configuration, particularly when there is patellofemoral erosion, dysfunction or prior patellectomy;

• moderate valgus, varus or flexion deformities;

• treatment of fractures that are unmanageable using other techniques.

These devices may also be indicated in the salvage of previously failed surgical attempts.

When the EMPOWR® Dynamic Natural Alignment (DNA) approach is utilized, these devices are indicated for patients with disability due to:

• degenerative, post-traumatic or rheumatoid arthritis;

• avascular necrosis of the femoral condyle;

• moderate valgus, varus or flexion deformities.

All EMPOWR devices except for the EMPOWR Revision Knee TM, EMPOWR PS Knee TM, and EMPOWR Partial Knee TM may be implanted using the EMPOWR® Dynamic Natural Alignment (DNA) surgical technique.

All devices are intended for cemented applications except for the EMPOWR Porous® Knee Femur, EMPOWR Porous® Knee Tibia, and Porous Patella which are intended for cementless applications.

While knee replacements are not intended to withstand activity levels and loads of normal healthy bone, they are a means of restoring mobility and reducing pain for many patients.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K252974: EMPOWR Knee.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K252974

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026