510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · 2009

Double-Swivel Connector

K850964510(k) TraditionalCleared May 14, 198567-day reviewClass I21 CFR 868.5810Recalls 5

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Sheridan Catheter Corp. · BZA Connector, Airway (Extension)

Cleared on May 14, 1985 after a 67-day review. FDA has not posted a summary or statement for it, so its predicates are not known. 1 later device descends from it. It has been recalled 5 times.

Decided
May 14, 1985
Review
67 days
Class
Class I
Product code
BZA
Recalls
5
Predicates
0

1 later device descends from it, 1 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2009: 1 descendant cleared1990200020102020
  1. This deviceK850964 Double-Swivel ConnectorSheridan Catheter Corp. · 1985
  2. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK083702 Trach-AssistMergenet Medical · 2009

Most influential descendants

Showing 1 of 1 · See all
  • K083702Trach-AssistMergenet Medical · 2009 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
0 (this device)K850964Double-Swivel ConnectorSheridan Catheter Corp.1985—
+1K083702Trach-AssistMergenet Medical2009—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200910
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K850964, 1985–2009Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in BZA? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

  • Candidate predicates for a device like this, rankedin the report
  • Recall history across each candidate’s familyin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against?

FDA has not posted a summary or statement for it, so its predicates are not known.

What descends from it? (1)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K083702Trach-AssistMergenet Medical20090

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Jul 31, 2009Not classifiedZ-1941-2009Process controlThe tether attaching to the double swivel cap may partially or completely break at the attachment points, resulting in the potential of the accidental aspiration of the tether into the patient's lungs.
Jul 31, 2009Not classifiedZ-1942-2009Process controlThe tether attaching to the double swivel cap may partially or completely break at the attachment points, resulting in the potential of the accidental aspiration of the tether into the patient's lungs.
Jul 31, 2009Not classifiedZ-1940-2009Process controlThe tether attaching to the double swivel cap may partially or completely break at the attachment points, resulting in the potential of the accidental aspiration of the tether into the patient's lungs.
Jul 31, 2009Not classifiedZ-1944-2009Process controlThe tether attaching to the double swivel cap may partially or completely break at the attachment points, resulting in the potential of the accidental aspiration of the tether into the patient's lungs.
Jul 31, 2009Not classifiedZ-1943-2009Process controlThe tether attaching to the double swivel cap may partially or completely break at the attachment points, resulting in the potential of the accidental aspiration of the tether into the patient's lungs.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Of its descendants, K083702 (Mergenet Medical, 2009) has gone furthest, with 0 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All BZA devices

BZA Connector, Airway (Extension): FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · BZA

1in 2009

2009: 1
2007high 1 (2009) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · BZA

Too few BZA 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.

Recalls per year · BZA

4in 2025

2009: 62019: 42024: 22025: 4, 4 Class I
2007high 6 (2009) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (4 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · BZA

25in 2025

2007: 82008: 92009: 172010: 92011: 32012: 822013: 112014: 172015: 212016: 52017: 192018: 152019: 132020: 212021: 152022: 212023: 382024: 282025: 25
2007high 82 (2012) · low 3 (2011)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code BZA, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—08
20080—09
20091—617
20100—09
20110—03
20120—082
20130—011
20140—017
20150—021
20160—05
20170—019
20180—015
20190—413
20200—021
20210—015
20220—021
20230—038
20240—228
20250—4 (4)25
20260—0—
Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K850964: Double-Swivel Connector.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K850964

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026