510(k) · Cleared
ClearedOlympus PF-18 & PF-25 Ultrathin Angioscope
Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly
Olympus Corp. · LYK Angioscope
Cleared on Nov 20, 1986 after a 258-day review. FDA has not posted a summary or statement for it, so its predicates are not known. 2 later devices descend from it.
- Decided
- Nov 20, 1986
- Review
- 258 days
- Class
- Class II
- Product code
- LYK
- Recalls
- None
- Predicates
- 0
2 later devices descend from it, 2 citing it directly.
- This deviceK860858 Olympus PF-18 & PF-25 Ultrathin AngioscopeOlympus Corp. · 1986
- Descendant · cites it directly · 1 of its ownK050808 Coronary Sinus Access Kit, Model KCS8F-01Cardio-Optics, Inc. · 2005
- Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK062340 Cardiooptics Augmentative Cardiac Optical Imaging SystemCardio-Optics, Inc. · 2006
Most influential descendants
Showing 2 of 2 · See allView FIG. 1 as a table
Line of descent and top descendants
| Generation | Number | Device | Applicant | Decided | Recalls |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 (this device) | K860858 | Olympus PF-18 & PF-25 Ultrathin Angioscope | Olympus Corp. | 1986 | — |
| +1 | K050808 | Coronary Sinus Access Kit, Model KCS8F-01 | Cardio-Optics, Inc. | 2005 | — |
| +1 | K062340 | Cardiooptics Augmentative Cardiac Optical Imaging System | Cardio-Optics, Inc. | 2006 | — |
Descendants by year cleared
| Year cleared | Devices | With a Class I recall |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 1 | 0 |
| 2006 | 1 | 0 |
Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.
Planning a device in LYK? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.
Top candidate predicates for a new LYK device
- #1 K253842 Vena MicroAngioscope™ Systemscore 10.8 · 1 generation · no Class I recall
- #2 Held for the reportin the report
What was it cleared against?
FDA has not posted a summary or statement for it, so its predicates are not known.
What descends from it? (2)
2 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.
Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)
No FDA recall names this device.
No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.
What does this lineage say?
- Of its descendants, K050808 (Cardio-Optics, Inc., 2005) has gone furthest, with 1 descendant of its own.
How does its category compare?
All LYK devicesLYK Angioscope: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.
FDA decisions per year · LYK
1in 2025
2026 to Oct 25, outlined.
Median 510(k) review, days · LYK
Too few LYK 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.
Recalls per year · LYK
No recall names LYK since 2007.
Adverse event reports per year · LYK
1in 2024
MAUDE reports naming product code LYK, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.
View these four charts as a table
| Year | Decisions | Median 510(k) review, days | Recalls (Class I) | MAUDE reports |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 0 | — | 0 | 1 |
| 2011 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 0 | — | 0 | 2 |
| 2014 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 0 | — | 0 | 1 |
| 2018 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2022 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2023 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2024 | 0 | — | 0 | 1 |
| 2025 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2026 | 1 | — | 0 | — |
https://510kreport.com/device/K860858 · printed Nov 6, 2026
Cite this page
510(k) Report. “K860858: Olympus PF-18 & PF-25 Ultrathin Angioscope.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K860858
Report an extraction error
Are you the manufacturer?
Record history
- FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
- Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
- Page last updated Nov 3, 2026