510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · Class II · 2013

Omed Wound Closure Strips

K874813510(k) TraditionalCleared Jan 29, 198866-day reviewClass I21 CFR 880.5240Recalls 1

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Oxboro Medical Intl., Inc. · FPX Strip, Adhesive, Closure, Skin

Cleared on Jan 29, 1988 after a 66-day review. FDA has not posted a summary or statement for it, so its predicates are not known. It has been recalled once.

Decided
Jan 29, 1988
Review
66 days
Class
Class I
Product code
FPX
Recalls
1
Predicates
0

FDA has not posted a summary or statement for it, so its predicates are not known.

FIG. 1 — Lineage of K874813Source: FDA 510(k) database · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in FPX? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

  • Candidate predicates for a device like this, rankedin the report
  • Recall history across each candidate’s familyin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against?

FDA has not posted a summary or statement for it, so its predicates are not known.

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Jul 18, 2013Class IIZ-1988-2013Process designAspen Surgical is recalling Wound Closures because firm could not confirm sterility, after FDA sampling indicated the product may not be sterile. Using the recalled product could lead to infection which may require further treatment…

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

How does its category compare?

All FPX devices

FPX Strip, Adhesive, Closure, Skin: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · FPX

FDA has decided no FPX device since 2007.

Median 510(k) review, days · FPX

Too few FPX 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.

Recalls per year · FPX

No recall names FPX since 2007.

Adverse event reports per year · FPX

10in 2021

2007: 12009: 62010: 102011: 82013: 42014: 32015: 22017: 12018: 22020: 92021: 10
2007high 10 (2010) · low 0 (2008)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code FPX, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—01
20080—00
20090—06
20100—010
20110—08
20120—00
20130—04
20140—03
20150—02
20160—00
20170—01
20180—02
20190—00
20200—09
20210—010
20220—00
20230—00
20240—00
20250—00
20260—0—
Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K874813: Omed Wound Closure Strips.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K874813

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026