510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · Class II · 2025

Resectoscope Sheath

K931995510(k) TraditionalCleared Jul 23, 199391-day reviewClass II21 CFR 876.1500Recalls 18

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Olympus Corp. · FJL Resectoscope

Cleared on Jul 23, 1993 after a 91-day review. FDA has not posted a summary or statement for it, so its predicates are not known. It has been recalled 18 times.

Decided
Jul 23, 1993
Review
91 days
Class
Class II
Product code
FJL
Recalls
18
Predicates
0

FDA has not posted a summary or statement for it, so its predicates are not known.

FIG. 1 — Lineage of K931995Source: FDA 510(k) database · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in FJL? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new FJL device

  1. #1 K221893 KARL STORZ Bipolar Resectoscopes with HF Cablescore 7.1 · 8 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against?

FDA has not posted a summary or statement for it, so its predicates are not known.

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Nov 11, 2025Class IIZ-1450-2026Under Investigation by firmComplaints of the ceramic tip of the resection sheath breaking have been received.
Nov 11, 2025Class IIZ-1455-2026Under Investigation by firmComplaints of the ceramic tip of the resection sheath breaking have been received.
Nov 11, 2025Class IIZ-1452-2026Under Investigation by firmComplaints of the ceramic tip of the resection sheath breaking have been received.
Nov 11, 2025Class IIZ-1447-2026Under Investigation by firmComplaints of the ceramic tip of the resection sheath breaking have been received.
Nov 11, 2025Class IIZ-1457-2026Under Investigation by firmComplaints of the ceramic tip of the resection sheath breaking have been received.
Nov 11, 2025Class IIZ-1445-2026Under Investigation by firmComplaints of the ceramic tip of the resection sheath breaking have been received.
Nov 11, 2025Class IIZ-1441-2026Under Investigation by firmComplaints of the ceramic tip of the resection sheath breaking have been received.
Nov 11, 2025Class IIZ-1446-2026Under Investigation by firmComplaints of the ceramic tip of the resection sheath breaking have been received.
Nov 11, 2025Class IIZ-1442-2026Under Investigation by firmComplaints of the ceramic tip of the resection sheath breaking have been received.
Nov 11, 2025Class IIZ-1444-2026Under Investigation by firmComplaints of the ceramic tip of the resection sheath breaking have been received.
Nov 11, 2025Class IIZ-1456-2026Under Investigation by firmComplaints of the ceramic tip of the resection sheath breaking have been received.
Nov 11, 2025Class IIZ-1439-2026Under Investigation by firmComplaints of the ceramic tip of the resection sheath breaking have been received.
Nov 11, 2025Class IIZ-1438-2026Under Investigation by firmComplaints of the ceramic tip of the resection sheath breaking have been received.
Nov 11, 2025Class IIZ-1440-2026Under Investigation by firmComplaints of the ceramic tip of the resection sheath breaking have been received.
Nov 11, 2025Class IIZ-1453-2026Under Investigation by firmComplaints of the ceramic tip of the resection sheath breaking have been received.
Nov 11, 2025Class IIZ-1451-2026Under Investigation by firmComplaints of the ceramic tip of the resection sheath breaking have been received.
Nov 11, 2025Class IIZ-1448-2026Under Investigation by firmComplaints of the ceramic tip of the resection sheath breaking have been received.
Nov 11, 2025Class IIZ-1443-2026Under Investigation by firmComplaints of the ceramic tip of the resection sheath breaking have been received.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

How does its category compare?

All FJL devices

FJL Resectoscope: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · FJL

1in 2024

2007: 12010: 12017: 12019: 22023: 22024: 1
2007high 2 (2019) · low 0 (2008)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · FJL

Too few FJL 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.

Recalls per year · FJL

1in 2022

2013: 12022: 1
2007high 1 (2013) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · FJL

67in 2025

2007: 112008: 112009: 152010: 342011: 182012: 262013: 242014: 362015: 452016: 252017: 282018: 502019: 532020: 552021: 542022: 742023: 742024: 342025: 67
2007high 74 (2022) · low 11 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code FJL, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20071—011
20080—011
20090—015
20101—034
20110—018
20120—026
20130—124
20140—036
20150—045
20160—025
20171—028
20180—050
20192—053
20200—055
20210—054
20220—174
20232—074
20241—034
20250—067
20260—0—
Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K931995: Resectoscope Sheath.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K931995

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026