510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · Class II · 2019

Transwarmer

K934631510(k) TraditionalCleared Feb 3, 1994132-day reviewClass I21 CFR 890.5710Recalls 2

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Prism Technologies, Inc. · IMD Pack, Hot Or Cold, Disposable

Cleared on Feb 3, 1994 after a 132-day review. FDA lists a 510(k) statement for it but has not posted the file, so its predicates are not known. 3 later devices descend from it. It has been recalled 2 times.

Decided
Feb 3, 1994
Review
132 days
Class
Class I
Product code
IMD
Recalls
2
Predicates
0

3 later devices descend from it, 1 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 1999: 1 descendant cleared2002: 1 descendant cleared2008: 1 descendant cleared1990200020102020
  1. This deviceK934631 TranswarmerPrism Technologies, Inc. · 1994
  2. Descendant · cites it directly · 2 of its ownK982652 Allegiance Porta-Warm MattressAllegiance Healthcare Corp. · 1999
  3. Descendant · 2 generations on · 1 of its ownK021843 Eyefeel Ophthalmic WarmerBio-Lipid, Inc. · 2002
  4. Descendant · 3 generations on · 0 of its ownK082087 Eyefeel Ophthalmic WarmerBio-Lipid, Inc. · 2008

Most influential descendants

Showing 3 of 3 · See all
  • K982652Allegiance Porta-Warm MattressAllegiance Healthcare Corp. · 1999 · cites it directly2descendants
  • K021843Eyefeel Ophthalmic WarmerBio-Lipid, Inc. · 2002 · 2 generations on1descendant
  • K082087Eyefeel Ophthalmic WarmerBio-Lipid, Inc. · 2008 · 3 generations on0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
0 (this device)K934631TranswarmerPrism Technologies, Inc.1994—
+1K982652Allegiance Porta-Warm MattressAllegiance Healthcare Corp.1999—
+2K021843Eyefeel Ophthalmic WarmerBio-Lipid, Inc.2002—
+3K082087Eyefeel Ophthalmic WarmerBio-Lipid, Inc.2008—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199910
200210
200810
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K934631, 1994–2008Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in IMD? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new IMD device

  1. #1 K221653 InfaTherm Disposable Infant Warming Mattressscore 4.4 · 2 generations · no Class I recall
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against?

FDA lists a 510(k) statement for it but has not posted the file, so its predicates are not known.

What descends from it? (3)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K982652Allegiance Porta-Warm MattressAllegiance Healthcare Corp.19992

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Jul 8, 2019Class IIZ-2364-2019Error in labelingThe firm updated the IFU in April 2019 to clarify that use of the TRANSWARMER Mattress with other heat producing devices, such as an incubator, is prohibited and could lead to serious health consequences, such as skin burns. some products…
May 1, 2013Class IIZ-1397-2015Package design/selectionTrans Warmer Infant and Transport Mattress not labeled with exp.date may not meet specification

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Of its descendants, K982652 (Allegiance Healthcare Corp., 1999) has gone furthest, with 2 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All IMD devices

IMD Pack, Hot Or Cold, Disposable: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · IMD

1in 2022

2007: 12008: 12012: 12017: 12022: 1
2007high 1 (2007) · low 0 (2009)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · IMD

Too few IMD 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.

Recalls per year · IMD

4in 2021

2008: 42010: 12015: 12018: 32021: 4
2007high 4 (2008) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · IMD

66in 2025

2007: 2112008: 8042009: 2102010: 582011: 702012: 532013: 402014: 332015: 1932016: 2132017: 2342018: 2622019: 6322020: 2482021: 1422022: 2022023: 1842024: 1122025: 66
2007high 804 (2008) · low 33 (2014)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code IMD, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20071—0211
20081—4804
20090—0210
20100—158
20110—070
20121—053
20130—040
20140—033
20150—1193
20160—0213
20171—0234
20180—3262
20190—0632
20200—0248
20210—4142
20221—0202
20230—0184
20240—0112
20250—066
20260—0—
Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K934631: Transwarmer.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K934631

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026