510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · Class I · 2026

Arrow Percutaneous Sheath Introducer Kit AK-07903

K940079510(k) TraditionalCleared Nov 30, 1994327-day reviewClass II21 CFR 870.1340Recalls 10 (1 Class I)

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Arrow Intl., Inc. · DYB Introducer, Catheter

Cleared on Nov 30, 1994 after a 327-day review. FDA lists a 510(k) statement for it but has not posted the file, so its predicates are not known. 2 of the 3 devices in its family, counting itself, have a Class I recall. 2 later devices descend from it. It has been recalled 10 times, including a Class I recall.

Decided
Nov 30, 1994
Review
327 days
Class
Class II
Product code
DYB
Recalls
10 (1 Class I)
Predicates
0

2 later devices descend from it, 1 citing it directly. 2 of the 3 devices in this family, counting this one, have a Class I recall.

Descendants, by year cleared 2001: 1 descendant cleared, 1 with a Class I recall12003: 1 descendant cleared1990200020102020
  1. This deviceK940079 Arrow Percutaneous Sheath Introducer Kit AK-07903Arrow Intl., Inc. · 1994
  2. Descendant · cites it directly · 1 of its ownK011761 Mac Two-Lumen Central Venous Kit with Arrowg Ard Blue Antimicrobial…Arrow Intl., Inc. · 2001 · Recalled (Class I)
  3. Descendant · 2 generations on · 0 of its ownK032962 AC 3 Lumen Central Venous Access Kit with Arrowg+Ard Antimicrobial…Arrow Intl., Inc. · 2003

Class I recalls in this family

Most influential descendants

Showing 2 of 2 · See all
  • K011761Mac Two-Lumen Central Venous Kit with Arrowg Ard Blue Antimicrobial Surface and Integral…Arrow Intl., Inc. · 2001 · cites it directly1descendant
  • K032962AC 3 Lumen Central Venous Access Kit with Arrowg+Ard Antimicrobial SurfaceArrow Intl., Inc. · 2003 · 2 generations on0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
0 (this device)K940079Arrow Percutaneous Sheath Introducer Kit AK-07903Arrow Intl., Inc.1994—
+1K011761Mac Two-Lumen Central Venous Kit with Arrowg Ard Blue Antimicrobial Surface…Arrow Intl., Inc.2001Class I
+2K032962AC 3 Lumen Central Venous Access Kit with Arrowg+Ard Antimicrobial SurfaceArrow Intl., Inc.2003—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200111
200310
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K940079, 1994–2003Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

2 devices in this family have a Class I recall. A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new DYB device

  1. #1 K251051 AuST Steerable Sheathscore 18.0 · 10 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against?

FDA lists a 510(k) statement for it but has not posted the file, so its predicates are not known.

What descends from it? (2)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K011761Mac Two-Lumen Central Venous Kit with Arrowg Ard Blue Antimicrobial Surface and Integral… Class IArrow Intl., Inc.20011

Has anything in its family been recalled? (2 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Apr 21, 2026Class IZ-2385-2026Nonconforming Material/ComponentLidocaine, Bupivacaine, and 0.9% sodium chloride, the subject of a supplier recall, were included into kits and sets. The supplier was found to have quality issues and limited reports of drug ineffectiveness, and if sterility of a…
Apr 11, 2018Class IIZ-2018-2018Under Investigation by firmProduct sterility may be compromised due to unsealed packaging.
Apr 11, 2018Class IIZ-2017-2018Under Investigation by firmProduct sterility may be compromised due to unsealed packaging.
Apr 11, 2018Class IIZ-1975-2018Under Investigation by firmProduct sterility may be compromised due to unsealed packaging.
Apr 11, 2018Class IIZ-1986-2018Under Investigation by firmProduct sterility may be compromised due to unsealed packaging.
Dec 22, 2017Class IIZ-1334-2018Process controlCertain lots of cardiovascular catheters may not be completely sealed and so sterility of the product cannot be guaranteed.
Nov 14, 2017Class IIZ-1160-2018Labeling mix-upsProducts do not contain the Central Venous Catheter Placement Procedures Note or the Central Line Insertion Checklist, which is a tool intended to guide clinicians in the use of best practices during central line insertions.
Nov 24, 2009Not classifiedZ-0784-2010Nonconforming Material/ComponentQ-Syte Component contained in kits was recalled by manufacturer due to the potential for embolism if used with a central venous catheter.
Feb 11, 2009Not classifiedZ-1492-2009Device DesignLeakage: Material not lipid resistant, may crack and/or leak. Use of this device with lipid containing solutions or 70% isopropyl alcohol may cause leakage or air embolism.
Jul 8, 2003Not classifiedZ-1035-03Otherseparation of sheath

Relatives with a Class I recall

Class I is FDA’s most serious recall class. A recall in the family tree is context for this device, not evidence about it.

  • K011761Mac Two-Lumen Central Venous Kit with Arrowg Ard Blue Antimicrobial Surface and Integral Hemostasis…Arrow Intl., Inc. · 2001 · Cites it directly · ◆ in the 2001 descendants bar of FIG. 11 Class I recall

What does this lineage say?

  • Of its descendants, K011761 (Arrow Intl., Inc., 2001) has gone furthest, with 1 descendant of its own.

How does its category compare?

All DYB devices

DYB Introducer, Catheter: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · DYB

16in 2025

2007: 122008: 172009: 142010: 182011: 172012: 222013: 262014: 302015: 172016: 192017: 242018: 192019: 182020: 92021: 122022: 132023: 152024: 182025: 162026 (partial year): 17
2007high 30 (2014) · low 9 (2020)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · DYB

63in 2025

2007: 95 days median2008: 37 days median2009: 52 days median2010: 123 days median2011: 100 days median2012: 128 days median2013: 118 days median2014: 122 days median2015: 129 days median2016: 95 days median2017: 70 days median2018: 156 days median2019: 47 days median2020: 49 days median2021: 78 days median2022: 143 days median2023: 55 days median2024: 56 days median2025: 63 days median2026 (partial year): 59 days median
2007high 156 (2018) · low 37 (2008)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · DYB

3in 2025

2007: 152008: 92009: 252010: 182011: 42012: 32013: 5, 1 Class I2014: 22015: 2, 1 Class I2016: 45, 3 Class I2017: 22, 1 Class I2018: 12019: 22020: 21, 21 Class I2021: 62022: 22023: 102024: 22025: 32026 (partial year): 23, 21 Class I
2007high 45 (2016) · low 1 (2018)2026

Class I (48 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · DYB

4,539in 2025

2007: 3162008: 4232009: 3992010: 4452011: 6282012: 8982013: 7432014: 7802015: 9132016: 1,2342017: 1,6722018: 1,9032019: 2,4502020: 2,4652021: 2,8352022: 4,0842023: 3,7752024: 3,9312025: 4,539
2007high 4,539 (2025) · low 316 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code DYB, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
2007129515316
200817379423
2009145225399
20101812318445
2011171004628
2012221283898
2013261185 (1)743
2014301222780
2015171292 (1)913
2016199545 (3)1,234
2017247022 (1)1,672
20181915611,903
2019184722,450
202094921 (21)2,465
2021127862,835
20221314324,084
20231555103,775
2024185623,931
2025166334,539
2026175923 (21)—
Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K940079: Arrow Percutaneous Sheath Introducer Kit AK-07903.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 5, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K940079

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026