510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Innova Pelvic Floor Stimulation System

K941911510(k) TraditionalCleared Jan 20, 1995276-day reviewClass II21 CFR 876.5320

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Empi · KPI Stimulator, Electrical, Non-Implantable, For Incontinence

Cleared on Jan 20, 1995 after a 276-day review. FDA has not posted a summary or statement for it, so its predicates are not known. 20 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Jan 20, 1995
Review
276 days
Class
Class II
Product code
KPI
Recalls
None
Predicates
0

20 later devices descend from it, 3 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 1997: 3 descendants cleared2011: 1 descendant cleared2015: 2 descendants cleared1998: 1 descendant cleared2019: 1 descendant cleared2024: 1 descendant cleared2016: 1 descendant cleared2018: 1 descendant cleared2026: 4 descendants cleared2023: 3 descendants cleared2025: 2 descendants cleared1995200020052010201520202025
  1. This deviceK941911 Innova Pelvic Floor Stimulation SystemEmpi · 1995
  2. Descendant · cites it directly · 12 of its ownK970307 Minnova Pelvic Floor Stimulation SystemEmpi · 1997
  3. Descendant · 2 generations on · 9 of its ownK973096 Neotonus Model 1000 Muscle Stimulator SystemNeotonus, Inc. · 1998
  4. Descendant · 3 generations on · 7 of its ownK162010 HPM-6000UBTL Industries, Inc. · 2016
  5. Descendant · 4 generations on · 6 of its ownK181497 HPM-6000UFBTL Industries, Inc. · 2018
  6. Descendant · cites it directly · 6 of its ownK103698 Tenscare Itouch Sure Model ItsTenscare, Ltd. · 2011

Showing 5 of 20 descendants. See all descendants

Descendants cleared per year

1997: 31998: 12011: 12015: 22016: 12018: 12019: 12023: 32024: 12025: 22026: 4
1997high 4 (2026) · low 0 (1999)2026

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 20 · See all
  • K970307Minnova Pelvic Floor Stimulation SystemEmpi · 1997 · cites it directly12descendants
  • K973096Neotonus Model 1000 Muscle Stimulator SystemNeotonus, Inc. · 1998 · 2 generations on9descendants
  • K162010HPM-6000UBTL Industries, Inc. · 2016 · 3 generations on7descendants
  • K181497HPM-6000UFBTL Industries, Inc. · 2018 · 4 generations on6descendants
  • K103698Tenscare Itouch Sure Model ItsTenscare, Ltd. · 2011 · cites it directly6descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
0 (this device)K941911Innova Pelvic Floor Stimulation SystemEmpi1995—
+1K970307Minnova Pelvic Floor Stimulation SystemEmpi1997—
+2K973096Neotonus Model 1000 Muscle Stimulator SystemNeotonus, Inc.1998—
+3K162010HPM-6000UBTL Industries, Inc.2016—
+4K181497HPM-6000UFBTL Industries, Inc.2018—
+1K103698Tenscare Itouch Sure Model ItsTenscare, Ltd.2011—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199730
199810
201110
201520
201610
201810
201910
202330
202410
202520
202640
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K941911, 1995–2026Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in KPI? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new KPI device

  1. #1 K262353 BTL-299-Fscore 14.8 · 10 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against?

FDA has not posted a summary or statement for it, so its predicates are not known.

What descends from it? (20)

See all 20

3 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K970307Minnova Pelvic Floor Stimulation SystemEmpi199712
K103698Tenscare Itouch Sure Model ItsTenscare, Ltd.20116
K971527Innosense Pelvic Floor Stimulation and Electromyography SystemEmpi19970

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Of its descendants, K970307 (Empi, 1997) has gone furthest, with 12 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All KPI devices

KPI Stimulator, Electrical, Non-Implantable, For Incontinence: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · KPI

7so far in 2026, the most since 2007

2007: 12008: 12009: 22011: 12012: 22013: 12014: 32015: 62016: 32017: 12018: 32019: 22020: 12021: 32022: 32023: 32024: 42025: 42026 (partial year): 7
2007high 7 (2026) · low 0 (2010)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · KPI

263in 2025

2014: 57 days median2015: 260 days median2016: 89 days median2018: 304 days median2021: 217 days median2022: 181 days median2023: 197 days median2024: 172 days median2025: 263 days median2026 (partial year): 248 days median
2007high 304 (2018) · low 57 (2014)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · KPI

No recall names KPI since 2007.

Adverse event reports per year · KPI

2in 2024

2013: 12015: 22017: 42019: 22020: 32021: 12022: 22023: 62024: 2
2007high 6 (2023) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code KPI, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20071—00
20081—00
20092—00
20100—00
20111—00
20122—00
20131—01
201435700
2015626002
201638900
20171—04
2018330400
20192—02
20201—03
2021321701
2022318102
2023319706
2024417202
2025426300
202672480—
Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K941911: Innova Pelvic Floor Stimulation System.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K941911

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026