510(k) Report

510(k) · Decided

Decided

Pikos LP 01, Pikos LP E01

K945627510(k) TraditionalDecided Mar 4, 1996474-day reviewClass III21 CFR 870.3610

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Biotronik, Inc. · DXY Implantable Pacemaker Pulse-Generator

Cleared on Mar 4, 1996 as substantially equivalent to K914109 (Biotronik, GmbH & Co., 1992) after a 474-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 1992.

Decided
Mar 4, 1996
Review
474 days
Class
Class III
Product code
DXY
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K914109 (1992). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

K914109 · Pikos 01 & Pikos E 01 · Biotronik, GmbH & Co. · 199219901992199419961998
K914109 · Pikos 01 & Pikos E 01 · Biotronik, GmbH & Co. · 19920
  1. Root · 1 generation backK914109 Pikos 01 & Pikos E 01Biotronik, GmbH & Co. · 1992
  2. This deviceK945627 Pikos LP 01, Pikos LP E01Biotronik, Inc. · 1996
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−1K914109Pikos 01 & Pikos E 01Biotronik, GmbH & Co.1992—
0 (this device)K945627Pikos LP 01, Pikos LP E01Biotronik, Inc.1996—
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K945627, 1992–1996Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in DXY? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

  • Candidate predicates for a device like this, rankedin the report
  • Recall history across each candidate’s familyin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K914109Pikos 01 & Pikos E 01
Summary page 1
…01 models. SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE The Pikos LP 01/LP EO01 pulse generators are substantially equivalent to the curreatly marketed Pikos 01 and Pikos BO1 respectively (K914109/A, approved February 26, 1992). Data to support this statement is provided in the premarket notification. 13 Nov…
Biotronik, GmbH & Co.1992—

Also cleared against K914109: 1 other device →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Its one ancestor has no recall.
  • 1 other device also cites its predicate K914109.

How does its category compare?

All DXY devices

DXY Implantable Pacemaker Pulse-Generator: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · DXY

19in 2025

2016: 152017: 512018: 452019: 192020: 232021: 202022: 142023: 192024: 202025: 192026 (partial year): 19
2007high 51 (2017) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · DXY

Too few DXY 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.

Recalls per year · DXY

4in 2017

2009: 62010: 12011: 22017: 4
2007high 6 (2009) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · DXY

810in 2025

2007: 2,4072008: 2,6492009: 3,7502010: 4,1872011: 6,0502012: 3,7092013: 2,6822014: 5,6042015: 1,0222016: 5422017: 1,0472018: 2,0702019: 1,7992020: 5462021: 5602022: 7842023: 9222024: 7732025: 810
2007high 6,050 (2011) · low 542 (2016)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code DXY, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—02,407
20080—02,649
20090—63,750
20100—14,187
20110—26,050
20120—03,709
20130—02,682
20140—05,604
20150—01,022
201615—0542
201751—41,047
201845—02,070
201919—01,799
202023—0546
202120—0560
202214—0784
202319—0922
202420—0773
202519—0810
202619—0—

What is it indicated for?

The Pikos LP 01/LP BO1 models, like the Pikos 01/B01 models, are indicated for use in the following conditions:

Sinus node arrest or bradycardia with or without AV conduction disorder.

Intermittent or complete AV conduction block.

Brady/tachy syndromeorothermanifedafionofsicksinunyndromcwhichmfltsin

Atrial fibrillation and ventricular bradyarrhythmia.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K945627: Pikos LP 01, Pikos LP E01.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K945627

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026