510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Epilator

K952117510(k) TraditionalCleared Oct 19, 1995167-day reviewClass I21 CFR 878.5360

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Burke Neutech, Inc. · KCX Epilator, High Frequency, Tweezer-Type

Cleared on Oct 19, 1995 after a 167-day review. FDA lists a 510(k) statement for it but has not posted the file, so its predicates are not known. 1 later device descends from it.

Decided
Oct 19, 1995
Review
167 days
Class
Class I
Product code
KCX
Recalls
None
Predicates
0

1 later device descends from it, 1 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 1997: 1 descendant cleared1995200020052010201520202025
  1. This deviceK952117 EpilatorBurke Neutech, Inc. · 1995
  2. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK972695 Finally FreeMehl/Group Marketing · 1997

Most influential descendants

Showing 1 of 1 · See all
  • K972695Finally FreeMehl/Group Marketing · 1997 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
0 (this device)K952117EpilatorBurke Neutech, Inc.1995—
+1K972695Finally FreeMehl/Group Marketing1997—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199710
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K952117, 1995–1997Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in KCX? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

  • Candidate predicates for a device like this, rankedin the report
  • Recall history across each candidate’s familyin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against?

FDA lists a 510(k) statement for it but has not posted the file, so its predicates are not known.

What descends from it? (1)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K972695Finally FreeMehl/Group Marketing19970

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Of its descendants, K972695 (Mehl/Group Marketing, 1997) has gone furthest, with 0 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All KCX devices

KCX Epilator, High Frequency, Tweezer-Type: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · KCX

FDA has decided no KCX device since 2007.

Median 510(k) review, days · KCX

Too few KCX 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.

Recalls per year · KCX

No recall names KCX since 2007.

Adverse event reports per year · KCX

1in 2014

2012: 22014: 1
2007high 2 (2012) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code KCX, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—00
20080—00
20090—00
20100—00
20110—00
20120—02
20130—00
20140—01
20150—00
20160—00
20170—00
20180—00
20190—00
20200—00
20210—00
20220—00
20230—00
20240—00
20250—00
20260—0—
Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K952117: Epilator.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K952117

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026