510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · Class II · 2014

Simview 3000 CT Option

K953233510(k) TraditionalCleared Nov 29, 1996508-day reviewClass II21 CFR 892.5840Recalls 4

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc. · KPQ System, Simulation, Radiation Therapy

Cleared on Nov 29, 1996 as substantially equivalent to K912466 (Oldelft Corp. of America, 1991) and 1 other predicate after a 508-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 1985. It has been recalled 4 times.

Decided
Nov 29, 1996
Review
508 days
Class
Class II
Product code
KPQ
Recalls
4
Predicates
3

Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K853349 (1985). 2 ancestors in all. No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

Other ancestors, by year cleared 1991: 1 other ancestorK853349 · Varian Ximatron C-Series Radiotherapy Treatment ST · Varian Assoc., Inc. · 1985 · recalled1986198819901992199419961998
Other ancestors, by generation 1 generation back: 1 other ancestor K853349 · Varian Ximatron C-Series Radiotherapy Treatment ST · Varian Assoc., Inc. · 1985 · recalled0
  1. Root · 1 generation backK853349 Varian Ximatron C-Series Radiotherapy Treatment STVarian Assoc., Inc. · 1985 · Recalled
  2. This deviceK953233 Simview 3000 CT OptionSiemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc. · 1996
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−1K853349Varian Ximatron C-Series Radiotherapy Treatment STVarian Assoc., Inc.19851
0 (this device)K953233Simview 3000 CT OptionSiemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc.1996—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199110
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K953233, 1985–1996Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in KPQ? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

  • Candidate predicates for a device like this, rankedin the report
  • Recall history across each candidate’s familyin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (4)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary; numbers the summary cites that cannot be its predicate are marked – and kept off the family tree.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K912466Oldelft Simulix-MC
Summary page 2
…n System - 21 CFR § 892.5840 Class II, Product Code: RA 90 KPQ Predicate Devices: « SIMULIX-MC-CT-EXTENSION Oldelft Corporation of America Treatment Planning Simulator, K912466 * XIMATRON /CT, Varian Associates Treatment Planning Simulator, K 853349, 82K0274 Description of Device: The SIMPLI C.T. Option…
Oldelft Corp. of America1991—
*K853349Varian Ximatron C-Series Radiotherapy Treatment ST
Summary page 2
…Devices: « SIMULIX-MC-CT-EXTENSION Oldelft Corporation of America Treatment Planning Simulator, K912466 * XIMATRON /CT, Varian Associates Treatment Planning Simulator, K 853349, 82K0274 Description of Device: The SIMPLI C.T. Option for the SIMVIEW™ 3800 provides therapeutic quality CT images at simulati…
Varian Assoc., Inc.19851
Kept off the family treeK820274FDA’s K820274 is Digoxin Radioimmunoassay
Our OCR of the scanned summary read K820274, FDA’s number for Digoxin Radioimmunoassay (American Diagnostic Corp.). Its FDA name has none of the distinctive words the summary uses for the device it names, “XIMATRON /CT, Varian Associates; Treatment Planning Simulator”. Kept off the family tree.
American Diagnostic Corp.1982—
*—SIMULIX-MC-CT-EXTENSION, Oldelft Corporation of America
Named without a submission number
—

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Oct 10, 2014Class IIZ-0235-2015Device DesignSiemens became aware of a very rare occurrence where an intended movement of the SimView NT simulation system components could not be stopped with usual hand control commands or by use of the collision detection functionality. It is…
Dec 11, 2013Class IIZ-0786-2014Device DesignIn a very rare occurrence an intended movement of the SimView NT simulation system components could not be stopped with usual hand control or the collision detection functionality.
Nov 6, 2008Not classifiedZ-0646-2009Device DesignExcessive wear on drive belts used for Image Intensifier and/or X-ray head drive mechanisms may result in uncontrolled movement, which may cause injury.
Mar 10, 2008Not classifiedZ-2196-2008Software designThe firm sent an Update Instruction, "TH003/08/S" for Motion Enable Switch/holder assembly. The switch holder allows the motion enable switch to be activated if inserted partially; thereby enabling inadvertent motion and serious injury…

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • 1 of the 2 ancestors has a recall of any class.

How does its category compare?

All KPQ devices

KPQ System, Simulation, Radiation Therapy: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · KPQ

1in 2014

2007: 12008: 12009: 12010: 12013: 12014: 1
2007high 1 (2007) · low 0 (2011)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · KPQ

Too few KPQ 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.

Recalls per year · KPQ

1in 2014

2007: 62008: 32009: 12012: 12013: 12014: 1
2007high 6 (2007) · low 0 (2010)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · KPQ

1in 2020

2007: 172008: 122009: 72010: 102011: 122012: 112013: 12014: 32019: 12020: 1
2007high 17 (2007) · low 0 (2015)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code KPQ, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20071—617
20081—312
20091—17
20101—010
20110—012
20120—111
20131—11
20141—13
20150—00
20160—00
20170—00
20180—00
20190—01
20200—01
20210—00
20220—00
20230—00
20240—00
20250—00
20260—0—

What is it indicated for?

The SIMPLI C.T. Option for the SIMVIEW™ 3000 radiation therapy is used for the following:

1. To obtain CT images in the same position as the treatment.

2. To provide CT images to determine the contour of the patient.

3. To provide CT images to determine the size and location of internal structures.

4. To provide CT images to be used by the dosimetrist to determine the location of isocenter.

5. To provide tissue density information via Hounsfield numbers, which allows for more accurate calculations of the dose by accounting for variations in tissue densities. The intended use is the same as the predicate devices.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K953233: Simview 3000 CT Option.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K953233

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026