510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Taylor General Purpose Monitoring Electrode

K954951510(k) TraditionalCleared May 30, 1996213-day reviewClass II21 CFR 882.5890

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Taylor Industries, Inc. · GZJ Stimulator, Nerve, Transcutaneous, For Pain Relief

Cleared on May 30, 1996 as substantially equivalent to K900519 (Classic Medical Products, Inc., 1990) after a 213-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 1990.

Decided
May 30, 1996
Review
213 days
Class
Class II
Product code
GZJ
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K900519 (1990). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

K900519 · Classic Ecg/Stimulating NO. 1700 Series · Classic Medical Products, Inc. · 1990 · recalled19901992199419961998
  1. Root · 1 generation backK900519 Classic Ecg/Stimulating NO. 1700 SeriesClassic Medical Products, Inc. · 1990 · Recalled
  2. This deviceK954951 Taylor General Purpose Monitoring ElectrodeTaylor Industries, Inc. · 1996
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−1K900519Classic Ecg/Stimulating NO. 1700 SeriesClassic Medical Products, Inc.19901
0 (this device)K954951Taylor General Purpose Monitoring ElectrodeTaylor Industries, Inc.1996—
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K954951, 1990–1996Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in GZJ? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new GZJ device

  1. #1 K252767 actiTENS miniscore 13.1 · 9 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K900519Classic Ecg/Stimulating NO. 1700 Series
Summary page 1
…S Electrode is substantially equivalent, with similar indications for use to the foliowing devices which are currently legally marketed and in commercial distribution: *K900519 Classic Medical Products Classic ECG/ Stimulating No. 1700 Series Electrode Device Description The Tayior TENS Electrode is int…
Classic Medical Products, Inc.19901

Also cleared against K900519: 1 other device →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Its one ancestor has a recall.
  • 1 other device also cites its predicate K900519.

How does its category compare?

All GZJ devices

GZJ Stimulator, Nerve, Transcutaneous, For Pain Relief: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · GZJ

1in 2025

2007: 132008: 112009: 162010: 52011: 52012: 122013: 22014: 42015: 32016: 32017: 32018: 22019: 32020: 42021: 32022: 42023: 12024: 32025: 12026 (partial year): 2
2007high 16 (2009) · low 1 (2023)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · GZJ

207in 2024

2007: 223 days median2008: 136 days median2009: 155 days median2010: 232 days median2011: 168 days median2012: 154 days median2014: 344 days median2015: 202 days median2016: 163 days median2017: 113 days median2019: 156 days median2020: 183 days median2021: 231 days median2022: 175 days median2024: 207 days median
2007high 344 (2014) · low 113 (2017)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · GZJ

1in 2011

2007: 42008: 12011: 1
2007high 4 (2007) · low 0 (2009)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · GZJ

13in 2025

2007: 42008: 452009: 172010: 222011: 222012: 202013: 102014: 232015: 182016: 322017: 582018: 212019: 72020: 102021: 52022: 42023: 392024: 122025: 13
2007high 58 (2017) · low 4 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code GZJ, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20071322344
200811136145
200916155017
20105232022
20115168122
201212154020
20132—010
20144344023
20153202018
20163163032
20173113058
20182—021
2019315607
20204183010
2021323105
2022417504
20231—039
20243207012
20251—013
20262—0—

What is it indicated for?

The Taylor TENS electrode is designed to be used in monitoring/ stimulating applications. This type of application places the emphasis on the patient's comfort. We recommend that the patient’s skin be clean, dry, and shaved, if necessary. It has been shown that a mild abrasion with a prep pad or with fine sandpaper will reduce the inter electrode impedance imbalance, which can cause the pickup of 60 cycle noise, known as baseline hum. This means that the…

Read the full statement (122 words)

The Taylor TENS electrode is designed to be used in monitoring/ stimulating applications. This type of application places the emphasis on the patient's comfort. We recommend that the patient’s skin be clean, dry, and shaved, if necessary. It has been shown that a mild abrasion with a prep pad or with fine sandpaper will reduce the inter electrode impedance imbalance, which can cause the pickup of 60 cycle noise, known as baseline hum. This means that the way a patient's skin is prepared for the electrode, will affect the quality of how the users ECG tracings come out and the performance during stimulation procedures.

The Taylor TENS electrode is for Health Care Professionals only. It is intended for single patient use only.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K954951: Taylor General Purpose Monitoring Electrode.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 5, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K954951

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026