510(k) · Cleared
Recalled · Class II · 2016Aspach 65,000 (Modification)
Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly
The Anspach Effort, Inc. · HSZ Instrument, Surgical, Orthopedic, Pneumatic Powered & Accessory/Attachment
Cleared on Jan 17, 1996 after a 90-day review. FDA lists a 510(k) statement for it but has not posted the file, so its predicates are not known. It has been recalled 23 times.
- Decided
- Jan 17, 1996
- Review
- 90 days
- Class
- Class I
- Product code
- HSZ
- Recalls
- 23
- Predicates
- 0
FDA lists a 510(k) statement for it but has not posted the file, so its predicates are not known.
Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.
Planning a device in HSZ? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.
- Candidate predicates for a device like this, rankedin the report
- Recall history across each candidate’s familyin the report
What was it cleared against?
FDA lists a 510(k) statement for it but has not posted the file, so its predicates are not known.
What descends from it?
No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.
Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)
Recalls of this device
| Date | Class | Recall | Root cause | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 6, 2016 | Class II | Z-1979-2017 | Under Investigation by firm | Supplied Directions for Use (DFU) did not contain a recommended service interval. |
| Oct 6, 2016 | Class II | Z-2017-2017 | Under Investigation by firm | Supplied Directions for Use (DFU) did not contain a recommended service interval. |
| Oct 6, 2016 | Class II | Z-1965-2017 | Under Investigation by firm | Supplied Directions for Use (DFU) did not contain a recommended service interval. |
| Oct 6, 2016 | Class II | Z-1971-2017 | Under Investigation by firm | Supplied Directions for Use (DFU) did not contain a recommended service interval. |
| Oct 6, 2016 | Class II | Z-1941-2017 | Under Investigation by firm | Supplied Directions for Use (DFU) did not contain a recommended service interval. |
| Oct 6, 2016 | Class II | Z-1973-2017 | Under Investigation by firm | Supplied Directions for Use (DFU) did not contain a recommended service interval. |
| Oct 6, 2016 | Class II | Z-1969-2017 | Under Investigation by firm | Supplied Directions for Use (DFU) did not contain a recommended service interval. |
| Oct 6, 2016 | Class II | Z-1980-2017 | Under Investigation by firm | Supplied Directions for Use (DFU) did not contain a recommended service interval. |
| Oct 6, 2016 | Class II | Z-2018-2017 | Under Investigation by firm | Supplied Directions for Use (DFU) did not contain a recommended service interval. |
| Oct 6, 2016 | Class II | Z-1977-2017 | Under Investigation by firm | Supplied Directions for Use (DFU) did not contain a recommended service interval. |
| Oct 6, 2016 | Class II | Z-1974-2017 | Under Investigation by firm | Supplied Directions for Use (DFU) did not contain a recommended service interval. |
| Oct 6, 2016 | Class II | Z-1964-2017 | Under Investigation by firm | Supplied Directions for Use (DFU) did not contain a recommended service interval. |
| Oct 6, 2016 | Class II | Z-1967-2017 | Under Investigation by firm | Supplied Directions for Use (DFU) did not contain a recommended service interval. |
| Oct 6, 2016 | Class II | Z-1970-2017 | Under Investigation by firm | Supplied Directions for Use (DFU) did not contain a recommended service interval. |
| Oct 6, 2016 | Class II | Z-1968-2017 | Under Investigation by firm | Supplied Directions for Use (DFU) did not contain a recommended service interval. |
| Oct 6, 2016 | Class II | Z-1972-2017 | Under Investigation by firm | Supplied Directions for Use (DFU) did not contain a recommended service interval. |
| Oct 6, 2016 | Class II | Z-1975-2017 | Under Investigation by firm | Supplied Directions for Use (DFU) did not contain a recommended service interval. |
| Oct 6, 2016 | Class II | Z-1976-2017 | Under Investigation by firm | Supplied Directions for Use (DFU) did not contain a recommended service interval. |
| Oct 6, 2016 | Class II | Z-1963-2017 | Under Investigation by firm | Supplied Directions for Use (DFU) did not contain a recommended service interval. |
| May 8, 2014 | Class II | Z-1983-2014 | Process control | Several attachments and handpieces failed to meet the expected sterility assurance level (SAL) when sterilized by the method that is specified in the current Directions for Use (DFU) provided with the device. |
| Apr 25, 2013 | Class II | Z-0654-2014 | Component design/selection | The firm Anspach Effort of Palm Beach Gardens, FL initiated a voluntary removal of the Pneumatic Drill System, including the motor hand-piece, Auto Lube foot control, without a pressure relief valve (PRV) due to the hand piece's outer… |
| May 6, 2011 | Class II | Z-0199-2014 | Labeling Change Control | Anspach Effort, Inc. Palm Beach Gardens, FL initiated a correction of its medical Device labeling for its Pneumatic Systems Operating Manual, Cutting Burr Chart and Product Catalog due to a recent review of their regulations and… |
| May 18, 2007 | Not classified | Z-1008-2007 | Nonconforming Material/Component | The white film portion of the sterile pouch may become brittle prior to the expiry date compromising the sterility of the product. |
The 5 latest of 23 recalls; the web page lists all.
No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.
How does its category compare?
All HSZ devicesHSZ Instrument, Surgical, Orthopedic, Pneumatic Powered & Accessory/Attachment: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.
FDA decisions per year · HSZ
FDA has decided no HSZ device since 2007.
Median 510(k) review, days · HSZ
Too few HSZ 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.
Recalls per year · HSZ
1in 2013
Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified
Adverse event reports per year · HSZ
4in 2025
MAUDE reports naming product code HSZ, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.
View these four charts as a table
| Year | Decisions | Median 510(k) review, days | Recalls (Class I) | MAUDE reports |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 0 | — | 0 | 111 |
| 2008 | 0 | — | 0 | 13 |
| 2009 | 0 | — | 0 | 14 |
| 2010 | 0 | — | 0 | 11 |
| 2011 | 0 | — | 1 | 3 |
| 2012 | 0 | — | 0 | 27 |
| 2013 | 0 | — | 1 | 411 |
| 2014 | 0 | — | 0 | 18 |
| 2015 | 0 | — | 0 | 20 |
| 2016 | 0 | — | 0 | 27 |
| 2017 | 0 | — | 0 | 24 |
| 2018 | 0 | — | 0 | 13 |
| 2019 | 0 | — | 0 | 5 |
| 2020 | 0 | — | 0 | 13 |
| 2021 | 0 | — | 0 | 27 |
| 2022 | 0 | — | 0 | 35 |
| 2023 | 0 | — | 0 | 39 |
| 2024 | 0 | — | 0 | 7 |
| 2025 | 0 | — | 0 | 4 |
| 2026 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
https://510kreport.com/device/K955084 · printed Nov 6, 2026
Cite this page
510(k) Report. “K955084: Aspach 65,000 (Modification).” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K955084
Report an extraction error
Are you the manufacturer?
Record history
- FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
- Page last updated Nov 3, 2026