510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Rusch Reinforced Trachael Tube Cuffed, Sterile

K955495510(k) TraditionalCleared Jun 27, 1996209-day reviewClass II21 CFR 868.5730

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Rusch, Inc. · BTR Tube, Tracheal (W/Wo Connector)

Cleared on Jun 27, 1996 as substantially equivalent to K844296 (Sheridan Catheter Corp., 1984) and 1 other predicate after a 209-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 1983.

Decided
Jun 27, 1996
Review
209 days
Class
Class II
Product code
BTR
Recalls
None
Predicates
2

Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K830352 (1983). 2 ancestors in all. No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

Other ancestors, by year cleared 1984: 1 other ancestorK830352 · Reinforced Silicone Tracheal Tube · Portex, Inc. · 19831980198519901995
Other ancestors, by generation 1 generation back: 1 other ancestor K830352 · Reinforced Silicone Tracheal Tube · Portex, Inc. · 19830
  1. Root · 1 generation backK830352 Reinforced Silicone Tracheal TubePortex, Inc. · 1983
  2. This deviceK955495 Rusch Reinforced Trachael Tube Cuffed, SterileRusch, Inc. · 1996
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−1K830352Reinforced Silicone Tracheal TubePortex, Inc.1983—
0 (this device)K955495Rusch Reinforced Trachael Tube Cuffed, SterileRusch, Inc.1996—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
198410
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K955495, 1983–1996Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in BTR? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new BTR device

  1. #1 K251794 Tenax® Laser Resistant Endotracheal Tubescore 12.6 · 3 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (3)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K844296Tracheal Tube, Reinforced, Cuffed
Summary page 1
…rile for tracheal intubation applied for in this application is substantially equivalent in design, use and materials to the: Sheridan Reinforced Cuffed Tracheal Tube - K844296 SIMS/Concord/Portex Reinforced Cuffed Silicone Tracheal Tube - K830352 NCC/Mallinckrodt Reinforced Tracheal Tube Cuffed currentl…
Sheridan Catheter Corp.1984—
*K830352Reinforced Silicone Tracheal Tube
Summary page 1
…ntially equivalent in design, use and materials to the: Sheridan Reinforced Cuffed Tracheal Tube - K844296 SIMS/Concord/Portex Reinforced Cuffed Silicone Tracheal Tube - K830352 NCC/Mallinckrodt Reinforced Tracheal Tube Cuffed currently being marketed and sold in inter-state commerce. The device, which i…
Portex, Inc.1983—
*—NCC/Mallinckrodt Reinforced Tracheal Tube Cuffed
Named without a submission number
—

Also cleared against K844296: 2 other devices →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • None of the 2 ancestors has a recall.
  • 2 other devices also cite its predicate K844296.

How does its category compare?

All BTR devices

BTR Tube, Tracheal (W/Wo Connector): FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · BTR

7in 2025

2007: 12008: 72009: 72010: 32011: 22012: 52013: 12014: 32015: 32016: 12017: 22018: 52019: 52020: 32021: 12022: 12023: 12024: 12025: 72026 (partial year): 2
2007high 7 (2008) · low 1 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · BTR

258in 2025

2008: 61 days median2009: 135 days median2010: 179 days median2012: 261 days median2014: 308 days median2015: 262 days median2018: 242 days median2019: 211 days median2020: 246 days median2025: 258 days median
2007high 308 (2014) · low 61 (2008)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · BTR

3in 2022

2007: 22009: 212014: 20, 19 Class I2016: 12020: 1, 1 Class I2021: 22022: 32026 (partial year): 1
2007high 21 (2009) · low 0 (2008)2026

Class I (20 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · BTR

1,799in 2025

2007: 1362008: 1692009: 1552010: 3352011: 4222012: 5112013: 8072014: 9852015: 1,0162016: 8362017: 8122018: 9772019: 1,3792020: 1,0702021: 1,3292022: 1,1322023: 1,3302024: 1,6782025: 1,799
2007high 1,799 (2025) · low 136 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code BTR, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20071—2136
20087610169
2009713521155
201031790335
20112—0422
201252610511
20131—0807
2014330820 (19)985
2015326201,016
20161—1836
20172—0812
201852420977
2019521101,379
202032461 (1)1,070
20211—21,329
20221—31,132
20231—01,330
20241—01,678
2025725801,799
20262—1—

What is it indicated for?

The device is a single use, sterile, cuffed tracheal tube for tracheal intubation and indicated for airway management.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K955495: Rusch Reinforced Trachael Tube Cuffed, Sterile.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K955495

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026