510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · Class II · 2015

HD01-Series Transonic Hemodialysis Monitor (R%,QA,CO,QB,QB2)

K960817510(k) TraditionalCleared Feb 11, 1997349-day reviewClass II21 CFR 876.5820Recalls 1

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Transonic Systems, Inc. · MQS System, Hemodialysis, Access Recirculation Monitoring

Cleared on Feb 11, 1997 after a 349-day review. The FDA summary names its predicate without a number. 1 of the 19 devices in its family, counting itself, has a Class I recall. 18 later devices descend from it. It has been recalled once.

Decided
Feb 11, 1997
Review
349 days
Class
Class II
Product code
MQS
Recalls
1
Predicates
0

18 later devices descend from it, 4 citing it directly. 1 of the 19 devices in this family, counting this one, has a Class I recall.

Descendants, by year cleared 2003: 1 descendant cleared1998: 2 descendants cleared2015: 1 descendant cleared2004: 1 descendant cleared2012: 1 descendant cleared2008: 1 descendant cleared2002: 1 descendant cleared1999: 1 descendant cleared2006: 2 descendants cleared2010: 1 descendant cleared2007: 2 descendants cleared2013: 1 descendant cleared2023: 1 descendant cleared2019: 1 descendant cleared2020: 1 descendant cleared, 1 with a Class I recall11995200020052010201520202025
  1. This deviceK960817 HD01-Series Transonic Hemodialysis Monitor (R%,QA,CO,QB,QB2)Transonic Systems, Inc. · 1997
  2. Descendant · cites it directly · 10 of its ownK980906 Transonic Hemodialysis Monitor, Cardiac Output, Model HD01-COTransonic Systems, Inc. · 1998
  3. Descendant · cites it directly · 6 of its ownK982412 Modification of Crit-Line Monitor Iii (CLM Iii)In-Line Diagnostics Corp. · 1998
  4. Descendant · cites it directly · 5 of its ownK030456 Vasc-AlertVasc-Alert, LLC · 2003
  5. Descendant · 2 generations on · 4 of its ownK060008 Aquadex Flexflow SystemChf Solutions, Inc. · 2006
  6. Descendant · 2 generations on · 4 of its ownK042566 Vasc-AlertVasc-Alert, Inc. · 2004

Showing 5 of 18 descendants. See all descendants

Descendants cleared per year

1998: 21999: 12002: 12003: 12004: 12006: 22007: 22008: 12010: 12012: 12013: 12015: 12019: 12020: 12023: 1
1998high 2 (1998) · low 0 (2000)2026

Class I recalls in this family

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 18 · See all
  • K980906Transonic Hemodialysis Monitor, Cardiac Output, Model HD01-COTransonic Systems, Inc. · 1998 · cites it directly10descendants
  • K982412Modification of Crit-Line Monitor Iii (CLM Iii)In-Line Diagnostics Corp. · 1998 · cites it directly6descendants
  • K030456Vasc-AlertVasc-Alert, LLC · 2003 · cites it directly5descendants
  • K060008Aquadex Flexflow SystemChf Solutions, Inc. · 2006 · 2 generations on4descendants
  • K042566Vasc-AlertVasc-Alert, Inc. · 2004 · 2 generations on4descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
0 (this device)K960817HD01-Series Transonic Hemodialysis Monitor (R%,QA,CO,QB,QB2)Transonic Systems, Inc.1997—
+1K980906Transonic Hemodialysis Monitor, Cardiac Output, Model HD01-COTransonic Systems, Inc.1998—
+1K982412Modification of Crit-Line Monitor Iii (CLM Iii)In-Line Diagnostics Corp.1998—
+1K030456Vasc-AlertVasc-Alert, LLC2003—
+2K060008Aquadex Flexflow SystemChf Solutions, Inc.2006—
+2K042566Vasc-AlertVasc-Alert, Inc.2004—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199820
199910
200210
200310
200410
200620
200720
200810
201010
201210
201310
201510
201910
202011
202310
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K960817, 1997–2023Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

1 device in this family has a Class I recall. A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new MQS device

  1. #1 K232283 PhySoftAMS®score 8.0 · 6 generations · no Class I recall
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (4)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*—BUN on Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 911 Analyzer
Named without a submission number
—
*—Philips P700 ultrasound system with CVI-Q option
Named without a submission number
—
*—Fresenius 2008 Dialysis System (pump readout only)
Named without a submission number
—
*—Transonic T101D/T201D with 8C clamp-on flow probe
Named without a submission number
—

What descends from it? (18)

See all 18

4 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K980906Transonic Hemodialysis Monitor, Cardiac Output, Model HD01-COTransonic Systems, Inc.199810
K982412Modification of Crit-Line Monitor Iii (CLM Iii)In-Line Diagnostics Corp.19986
K030456Vasc-AlertVasc-Alert, LLC20035
K134051Transonic Elsa SystemTransonic Systems, Inc.20150

Has anything in its family been recalled? (1 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Feb 17, 2015Class IIZ-1295-2015Process controlCustomer unable to obtain measurements due to the device seeing no flow or irrelevant flow condition during dialysis procedures. The user saw a zero or a very low flow value displayed on HD03 and/or no measurements produced in other modes…

Relatives with a Class I recall

Class I is FDA’s most serious recall class. A recall in the family tree is context for this device, not evidence about it.

  • K192756Aquadex FlexFlow System 2.0Chf Solutions, Inc. · 2020 · 6 generations on · ◆ in the 2020 descendants bar of FIG. 11 Class I recall

What does this lineage say?

  • Of its descendants, K980906 (Transonic Systems, Inc., 1998) has gone furthest, with 10 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All MQS devices

MQS System, Hemodialysis, Access Recirculation Monitoring: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · MQS

1in 2023

2013: 12019: 12023: 1
2007high 1 (2013) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · MQS

Too few MQS 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.

Recalls per year · MQS

No recall names MQS since 2007.

Adverse event reports per year · MQS

5in 2013

2007: 682008: 62009: 212010: 102011: 12012: 52013: 5
2007high 68 (2007) · low 0 (2014)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code MQS, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—068
20080—06
20090—021
20100—010
20110—01
20120—05
20131—05
20140—00
20150—00
20160—00
20170—00
20180—00
20191—00
20200—00
20210—00
20220—00
20231—00
20240—00
20250—00
20260—0—

What is it indicated for?

The HDO1-series monitors are intended for use by trained medical personnel on patients receiving hemodialysis treatment, for the routine monitoring of the following patient and blood handling diagnostic parameters: Access recirculation: a check on proper dialysis needle placement and dialysis pump setting in relation to flow in the access device. Access recirculation would prevent the patient of receiving its full hemodialysis prescription. Access…

Read the full statement (168 words)

The HDO1-series monitors are intended for use by trained medical personnel on patients receiving hemodialysis treatment, for the routine monitoring of the following patient and blood handling diagnostic parameters:

Access recirculation: a check on proper dialysis needle placement and dialysis pump setting in relation to flow in the access device. Access recirculation would prevent the patient of receiving its full hemodialysis prescription. Access recirculation that cannot be mitigated by altering needle placement should be referred to the attending physician, for a change in the patient hemodialysis prescription and as a possible indication of deteriorating flow in the access device.

Access flow: allows the routine monitoring of patency of the access device. A substantial decrease in flow passing through the shunt or fistula from the initial level may indicate deterioration of the access, and should be referred to the attending physician for further diagnostic assessment and treatment.

[unreadable]: a check on the hemodialysis pump setting, to confirm that the patient receives the hemodialysis treatment prescribed by the attending physician.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K960817: HD01-Series Transonic Hemodialysis Monitor (R%,QA,CO,QB,QB2).” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K960817

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026