510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · 2010

Seraquest Rubella Igg

K961053510(k) TraditionalCleared Sep 4, 1996170-day reviewClass II21 CFR 866.3510Recalls 2

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Quest Intl., Inc. · LFX Enzyme Linked Immunoabsorbent Assay, Rubella

Cleared on Sep 4, 1996 after a 170-day review. The FDA summary names its predicate without a number. 3 later devices descend from it. It has been recalled 2 times.

Decided
Sep 4, 1996
Review
170 days
Class
Class II
Product code
LFX
Recalls
2
Predicates
0

3 later devices descend from it, 1 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2010: 1 descendant cleared2023: 1 descendant cleared2011: 1 descendant cleared1995200020052010201520202025
  1. This deviceK961053 Seraquest Rubella IggQuest Intl., Inc. · 1996
  2. Descendant · cites it directly · 2 of its ownK091616 Bioplex 2200 MMRV IggBio-Rad Laboratories · 2010
  3. Descendant · 2 generations on · 0 of its ownK212769 DYNEX SmartPLEX MMRV IgG Assay KitDynex Technologies, Inc. · 2023
  4. Descendant · 2 generations on · 0 of its ownK111072 Bioplex 2200 MMRV Igg IT on Bioplex 2200 Multi-Analyte Detection…Bio-Rad Laboratories · 2011

Most influential descendants

Showing 3 of 3 · See all
  • K091616Bioplex 2200 MMRV IggBio-Rad Laboratories · 2010 · cites it directly2descendants
  • K212769DYNEX SmartPLEX MMRV IgG Assay KitDynex Technologies, Inc. · 2023 · 2 generations on0descendants
  • K111072Bioplex 2200 MMRV Igg IT on Bioplex 2200 Multi-Analyte Detection System, Bioplex 2200…Bio-Rad Laboratories · 2011 · 2 generations on0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
0 (this device)K961053Seraquest Rubella IggQuest Intl., Inc.1996—
+1K091616Bioplex 2200 MMRV IggBio-Rad Laboratories2010—
+2K212769DYNEX SmartPLEX MMRV IgG Assay KitDynex Technologies, Inc.2023—
+2K111072Bioplex 2200 MMRV Igg IT on Bioplex 2200 Multi-Analyte Detection System…Bio-Rad Laboratories2011—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201010
201110
202310
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K961053, 1996–2023Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in LFX? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new LFX device

  1. #1 K250588 Access Rubella IgGscore 10.4 · 1 generation · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*—Rubella IgG Clin-ELISA kit, INCSTAR Corporation
Named without a submission number
—

What descends from it? (3)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K091616Bioplex 2200 MMRV IggBio-Rad Laboratories20102

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Jul 19, 2010Not classifiedZ-2201-2011Software designThe EVOLIS Assay Protocol Files Software is configured in such a way that may result in a miscalculation of quantitative test results and/or an error in reporting positive/negative sample values.
Aug 20, 2008Not classifiedZ-0908-2010Employee errorElevated optical density (OD) values with the kit Negative Control.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Of its descendants, K091616 (Bio-Rad Laboratories, 2010) has gone furthest, with 2 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All LFX devices

LFX Enzyme Linked Immunoabsorbent Assay, Rubella: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · LFX

2in 2025

2007: 12008: 32010: 22011: 12012: 12025: 2
2007high 3 (2008) · low 0 (2009)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · LFX

354in 2008

2008: 354 days median
2007high 354 (2008)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · LFX

1in 2021

2007: 22008: 22009: 32010: 22011: 12016: 22021: 1
2007high 3 (2009) · low 0 (2012)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · LFX

12in 2025

2007: 52008: 3672009: 192010: 182011: 892012: 372013: 152014: 132015: 152016: 472017: 102018: 242019: 162020: 212021: 132022: 132023: 72024: 132025: 12
2007high 367 (2008) · low 5 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code LFX, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20071—25
200833542367
20090—319
20102—218
20111—189
20121—037
20130—015
20140—013
20150—015
20160—247
20170—010
20180—024
20190—016
20200—021
20210—113
20220—013
20230—07
20240—013
20252—012
20260—0—

What is it indicated for?

For the qualitative and quantitative detection of human IgG antibodies to Rubella in human serum by enzyme immunoassay, to aid in the determination of infection with rubella virus. When used as a qualitative test, SeraQuest Rubella 1gG aids in the assessment of the patient's immunological response to rubella. For manual use, or for use with the HyPrep System Plus.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K961053: Seraquest Rubella Igg.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K961053

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026